Which prime for general use?

johnwhit
Posted 03/07/2011 - 16:52 Link
johnriley wrote:
I think the 55mm f1.4 needs to be looked at as a replacement in digital terms for an 85mm f1.4 portrait lens. These were never cheap, and in this context the price looks about right.
The last price listing I have for the FA*85/1.4 was £900 towards the end of the 1990's

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
vrapan
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:14 Link
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
An expensive lens that is, especially for a 50something one
I think the 55mm f1.4 needs to be looked at as a replacement in digital terms for an 85mm f1.4 portrait lens. These were never cheap, and in this context the price looks about right.
I can't help but compare it with the FF compatible 50mm AF-S 1.4 Nikon that goes for less than 300...
Mike-P
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:17 Link
johnwhit wrote:

The last price listing I have for the FA*85/1.4 was £900 towards the end of the 1990's

John
LINK
johnwhit
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:25 Link
778.39 Buy it now, and that's used mine's up for sale when they release the Ricoh..........erm, I mean Pentax K3

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
Mike-P
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:26 Link
Might only be worth a couple of hundred by then
johnwhit
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:29 Link
vrapan wrote:
I can't help but compare it with the FF compatible 50mm AF-S 1.4 Nikon that goes for less than 300...
Yeah, but that's a plastic fantastic lens.

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
johnwhit
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:29 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Might only be worth a couple of hundred by then


John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
rparmar
Posted 03/07/2011 - 17:46 Link
RioRico wrote:
My currently most-used prime: Vivitar (Komine) 28/2 MC Close Focus Wide Angle (CFWA) which is fast, sharp, smooth, and small. MF, perfect FL on my K20D, no distortion, excellent for CIF. Mine cost US$18 a few months ago.
That is a miraculous price. Reasonably one would expect to pay over $100 -- though it's still well worth it at that. I wouldn't say "no distortion" but it has a reasonably small amount. The 24mm has notably more and still I don't mind the look for most shots.

However all of these Vivitar variants I have owned (quite a few) benefit from being stopped down to f/4 for sharpness. Generally that is not an issue with the normal uses for wide angle. They do have a nice manual focus feeling and are very usable on digital.
Listen to my albums free on BandCamp. Or visit my main website for links to photography, etc.
trickletreat
Posted 03/07/2011 - 19:44 Link
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
An expensive lens that is, especially for a 50something one
I think the 55mm f1.4 needs to be looked at as a replacement in digital terms for an 85mm f1.4 portrait lens. These were never cheap, and in this context the price looks about right.
I bought mine recently, secondhand from ffordes, for just over £400. It had none of the issues some report and was as good as new. I think if I add a Raynox, then I will have a good set up for portraits and macro, which increases its value further.
Nigel
Dangermouse
Posted 03/07/2011 - 21:15 Link
I used to use an SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5, then switched to the new DA 35mm f2.4 for the AF and simpler metering. To be honest, I'd prefer the field of view of the 28mm or even something wider. For this reason, my next new lens purchase may well be a DA 21mm when funds allow...
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo