Which one is sharper
The other lens I've found that I like for macro is the Pentax-M 50mm F1.4, although it has to be used reversed or with tubes / bellows for true macro. It's extremely sharp and renders details well. You will find these for between £40 and £80 although they are not the commonest 50mm lenses they are well worth seeking out.
Regards
David
I am currently shooting macro with Pentax 50mm M 1.7 + extension tubes, and I am rather happy with the sharpness.
John K
Have you considered using a Raynox macro converter?
The Raynox DCR-250 can be bought for about £50 and will fit your 50mm/1.7 lens.
I think I was misunderstood. My budget for a proper 1:1 macro lens is higher (around £200), but if I was to compromise and go for an older, manual 1:2 macro lens then I wouldn't want to spend more that around £100.
Thank you again. I think I will experiment with the tubes a little bit more to exactly what I need before I decide.
Thank you all.
I think I was misunderstood. My budget for a proper 1:1 macro lens is higher (around £200), but if I was to compromise and go for an older, manual 1:2 macro lens then I wouldn't want to spend more that around £100.
Thank you again. I think I will experiment with the tubes a little bit more to exactly what I need before I decide.
Regards
David
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


13627 posts
18 years
Hythe,
Hampshire UK
How about the idea of close up lenses or maybe extension tubes? That will be less expensive.
Hi
I am currently shooting macro with Pentax 50mm M 1.7 + extension tubes, and I am rather happy with the sharpness.