What will the new Pentax really offer us?
Posted 13/10/2013 - 06:55
Link
Just wondering How accurate is the peaking can anyone with a K-01 or a K30 chime in?
Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
5105 probably an updated derivative of the Sony IMX096AQL found in the A77, and probably destined for the Nex6 or 7 update. It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time. That will of course be dependant on how much of a threat Nikon in particular sees the K3, My personal view will be not at all, as they seem to have their eyes firmly fixed on Canon at all times. Everyone is grabbing market share off them at the moment, like stealing from a baby! The K3 seems to be causing a bit of a fuss over in Nikon DX land. If Canon jumps so will Nikon, then it will get interesting but for a little bit maybe just maybe Pentax could claim to be the king of the APSC DSLR???
I have high hopes for the K3, one of which is that all the claims made by Ricoh ain't just hot air!
Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
5105 probably an updated derivative of the Sony IMX096AQL found in the A77, and probably destined for the Nex6 or 7 update. It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time. That will of course be dependant on how much of a threat Nikon in particular sees the K3, My personal view will be not at all, as they seem to have their eyes firmly fixed on Canon at all times. Everyone is grabbing market share off them at the moment, like stealing from a baby! The K3 seems to be causing a bit of a fuss over in Nikon DX land. If Canon jumps so will Nikon, then it will get interesting but for a little bit maybe just maybe Pentax could claim to be the king of the APSC DSLR???
I have high hopes for the K3, one of which is that all the claims made by Ricoh ain't just hot air!
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 13/10/2013 - 07:18
Link
jules wrote:
Just wondering How accurate is the peaking can anyone with a K-01 or a K30 chime in?
I have neither but if it works from image info from the main sensor then you're not going to get any more accurate.
Just wondering How accurate is the peaking can anyone with a K-01 or a K30 chime in?
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 13/10/2013 - 07:26
Link
K-30 focus peaking is spot on. The highlight overlay is directly from the lens and is practically real time, so there's no weird lagging or anything when you use it. I think it's awesome, and would love it to be enabled if desired during Video recording, rather than just before you start recording.
Posted 13/10/2013 - 07:36
Link
Ta! For the info Smeggy and Rich. I had peaking on my Sony A77 it was one of the things I liked about it but little else, A technological marvel for sure but less than the sum of it's parts. Peaking intrigues for it's uses with fastish glass and in low light, might be worth investing in a couple of old manual primes on the cheap just for kicks...
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 13/10/2013 - 10:56
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
If you've used Sony focus peaking, Pentax's implementation will be slightly disappointing. No colour to make it stand out, and a pixellated / grainy zoomed view. Unless Ricoh have radically improved it on the K3 (Let's hope! )
I've never used Sony's implementation Will, so I can't compare, but I do find the focus peaking on the K-01 fantastic with the old MF lenses. It has transformed my use of the old glass and I almost always reserve these lenses for the K-01. If the peaking on the K-3 is as good or better than the K-01 it's definitely a feature worth having.If you've used Sony focus peaking, Pentax's implementation will be slightly disappointing. No colour to make it stand out, and a pixellated / grainy zoomed view. Unless Ricoh have radically improved it on the K3 (Let's hope! )
Regards
David
Posted 13/10/2013 - 11:13
Link
The extra grunt of the new imaging processer in the k3 might allow a better implementation. Not sure why Sony have been able to do it so much better in their puny NEX cameras but hey!
Posted 13/10/2013 - 11:15
Link
jules wrote:
Just wondering How accurate is the peaking can anyone with a K-01 or a K30 chime in?
On the K-01 it is superbly useful, a joy to use and I think the most accurate method as well - particularly when combined with the zoomed in view. Having quite a few old manual lenses I now wouldn't even consider anything without this feature when I finally upgrade my K7.Just wondering How accurate is the peaking can anyone with a K-01 or a K30 chime in?
Do you get the idea that I like this feature?
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:00
Link
jules wrote:
......might be worth investing in a couple of old manual primes on the cheap just for kicks...
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
Do you mean like these jules?.........might be worth investing in a couple of old manual primes on the cheap just for kicks...
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
jules wrote:
.....dusty fungus infested dinosaurs from forty odd years before Ricoh even bought the company
lol
.....dusty fungus infested dinosaurs from forty odd years before Ricoh even bought the company
C.O.L.B.A.S victim
(Compulsive Obsessive Lens Buying Addiction Syndrome)
What you need are lenses, more lenses, bigger lenses, better lenses, faster lenses, vintage lenses and when you have these, your pictures will be perfect!
(Compulsive Obsessive Lens Buying Addiction Syndrome)
What you need are lenses, more lenses, bigger lenses, better lenses, faster lenses, vintage lenses and when you have these, your pictures will be perfect!
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:08
Link
jules wrote:
Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
Missed this, where has it been confirmed?Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
Edit: disregard, found it now.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:24
Link
jules wrote:
It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time.
To what end Jules.It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time.
Joe blogs won't even ask what brand the imaging sensor is and just as well as the sales person probably won't know or even care.
Most camera owners out there are not passionate about photography just as the majority of people who listened to music at home were not HiFi buffs.
Wow & flutter may as well have been a dance move, THD was probably an offshoot of LSD and RMS was possibly a ship.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:32
Link
K10D wrote:
True, but it's nice to be at least optimistic that the K-3 sensor won't suffer from the long-exposure banding that the D7100 is alleged to.jules wrote:
It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time.
Joe Blogs won't even ask what brand the imaging sensor is and just as well as the sales person probably won't know or even care.It'll be one year more advanced than the current Toshiba, so there is a bit of hope to steal a march on caNikon at least for short time.
I haven't researched it to any depth, but it's not hard to find people that think that it's worse than the D7000 in this respect.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:39
Link
Defragged wrote:
Yeah! Some of them preferably bought in musty damp old second hand shops...
jules wrote:
......might be worth investing in a couple of old manual primes on the cheap just for kicks...
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
Do you mean like these jules?.........might be worth investing in a couple of old manual primes on the cheap just for kicks...
Some arn't that cheap though are they?
jules wrote:
.....dusty fungus infested dinosaurs from forty odd years before Ricoh even bought the company
lol .....dusty fungus infested dinosaurs from forty odd years before Ricoh even bought the company
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 13/10/2013 - 12:40
Link
ChrisA wrote:
Edit: disregard, found it now.
Pentax forums asked Ricoh!jules wrote:
Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
Missed this, where has it been confirmed?Pleased about the Sensor being confirmed as a Sony and not the Toshiba
Edit: disregard, found it now.
Also on imaging resource...
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


7671 posts
16 years
Smegland
Voted for AF myself, but not for sports or tracking. I just want absolute accuracy with my FA Limiteds wide open at the centre and not having doubts like I do now. Contrast peaking will be useful as well with my A50 f/1.2 and CZ 2/50 Makro-Planar.
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283