the moon problems
Posted 25/08/2009 - 19:17
Link
What camera is the lens used with? Can you set the ISO rating?
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 25/08/2009 - 19:22
Link
Pentax MG the film i have in at the minute is 200, but I can cahnge the exposure compensation if that helps
Posted 25/08/2009 - 19:52
Link
ISO 200 should be OK if the sky is clear enough, however 400 would be better, but you definately need a longer lens, I've tried moonshots with a 50-500 which gives me an effective 750mm allowing for the crop factor on a digital body, and I found even that only filled a quarter of the frame.
If your desperate to have a go I would suggest you look for a cheap 2x teleconverter, but dont expect frame filling shots
Edit! cheap teleconveter? that should be the best you can afford
If your desperate to have a go I would suggest you look for a cheap 2x teleconverter, but dont expect frame filling shots
Edit! cheap teleconveter? that should be the best you can afford
Posted 25/08/2009 - 23:19
Link
The camera thinks it's underexposed because most of the frame is dark.
However, the moon is extremely bright, so that part of the frame is likely to be overexposed. You'll just get a white disc with no detail that way.
You don't need high ISO, and you don't need long exposures to photograph the moon. In fact exposures much more than 1/10s, depending on focal length, will be long enough for the tracking of the moon across the sky to itself cause blur.
What you need is accurate focusing, the longest focal length lens you can lay your hands on (210 is very much on the short side, given you're using 35mm film) and spot metering on the moon itself.
And a tripod.
I took this, for example, with a 400mm lens (you'd need 600mm to get the same angle of view), ISO 100, 1/80s and F11, on the K10D.
It was heavily cropped, though - that's nowhere near the whole frame, which is a touch inconvenient with film, of course.
Note also that the detail is clearer a day or two before full moon - the shadows arising from the illumination not being quite direct make for a more contrasty picture.
Here's a full moon for comparison. Much less exposure (F16, 1/125s, and still too much, really), since the full moon is much, much brighter than a slightly not-full moon.
However, the moon is extremely bright, so that part of the frame is likely to be overexposed. You'll just get a white disc with no detail that way.
You don't need high ISO, and you don't need long exposures to photograph the moon. In fact exposures much more than 1/10s, depending on focal length, will be long enough for the tracking of the moon across the sky to itself cause blur.
What you need is accurate focusing, the longest focal length lens you can lay your hands on (210 is very much on the short side, given you're using 35mm film) and spot metering on the moon itself.
And a tripod.
I took this, for example, with a 400mm lens (you'd need 600mm to get the same angle of view), ISO 100, 1/80s and F11, on the K10D.
It was heavily cropped, though - that's nowhere near the whole frame, which is a touch inconvenient with film, of course.
Note also that the detail is clearer a day or two before full moon - the shadows arising from the illumination not being quite direct make for a more contrasty picture.
Here's a full moon for comparison. Much less exposure (F16, 1/125s, and still too much, really), since the full moon is much, much brighter than a slightly not-full moon.
Posted 25/08/2009 - 23:20
Link
Moon shots are not as easy as you think (apart from Apollo) I'm still trying and will again with the next one
Posted 26/08/2009 - 09:29
Link
I'd avoid shooting a full moon. I'd wait for 3/4.
The full moon looks flat, but once it starts to wane you'll get shadows which bring the detail out a bit more.
When I tried with my 35mm I always shot multiple images at various shutter speeds, starting quite fast and getting longer.
One thing I learnt quickly looking up through a telescope is just how fast the earth spins. As Chris says, much more than 1/10 will cause motion blur from the apparent movement of the moon across the sky.
The full moon looks flat, but once it starts to wane you'll get shadows which bring the detail out a bit more.
When I tried with my 35mm I always shot multiple images at various shutter speeds, starting quite fast and getting longer.
One thing I learnt quickly looking up through a telescope is just how fast the earth spins. As Chris says, much more than 1/10 will cause motion blur from the apparent movement of the moon across the sky.
Getting there! Thanks to you guys
Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
Posted 26/08/2009 - 22:22
Link
The moon is a sun-lit landscape and a camera exposure should be set for a sunny scene.
Friendly Regards
Graham
Graham
Posted 26/08/2009 - 22:40
Link
ChrisA wrote:
What you need is accurate focusing
I'm not trying to be pedantic but surely focussing at infinity would be fine, or am I missing something?
What you need is accurate focusing
Posted 26/08/2009 - 22:44
Link
Just had a look at the moon now, came up in the west Jaffa cake size half moon,
will wait a few more days and have a go with the Bigma,
will wait a few more days and have a go with the Bigma,
Posted 26/08/2009 - 22:46
Link
greynolds999 wrote:
Yes.ChrisA wrote:
What you need is accurate focusing
I'm not trying to be pedantic but surely focussing at infinity would be fine, or am I missing something?What you need is accurate focusing
Infinity focus on most lenses is set by a simple screw creating a mechanical stop. The setting of that stop can often be less than accurate and some lenses may not reach infinity focus whereas others will go beyond it. To assume that your lens is focussed at infinity because it's on it's stop is an unsafe assumption.
Anyway, the moon is only about 250,000 miles away, a long way short of infinity.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 26/08/2009 - 23:05
Link
Yes I agree Peter, the last shots I tried with the Bigma were all out of focus so this time I will only use manual focus, although it could have been haze, anyway I am determined to get a good shot this time,
Jack.
Jack.
Posted 26/08/2009 - 23:44
Link
jackitec wrote:
so this time I will only use manual focus
Aim to get the focusing ring in the middle of the (very small) range over which you get the focus confirmation hexagon displayed.so this time I will only use manual focus
Take lots of exposures, and re-focus after each one. Don't assume that because you haven't touched anything, nothing's moved and it's still right. Even so, you'll probably still get lots of duds for no apparent reason.
Use one of the mirror-up delay modes (preferably the 3s remote one) to minimise shake.
jackitec wrote:
although it could have been haze
You want the moon as high in the sky as possible.
although it could have been haze
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 26/08/2009 - 23:46
Link
jackitec wrote:
Just had a look at the moon now, came up in the west Jaffa cake size half moon,
will wait a few more days and have a go with the Bigma,
You might want to practise a bit before the day you want the best results.
Just had a look at the moon now, came up in the west Jaffa cake size half moon,
will wait a few more days and have a go with the Bigma,
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


36 posts
17 years
A full moon will be coming round again next week, around thursday.
The best lens i have for moon photography is the 70-210mm lens. The last time I tried, the shutter speed display showed UNDER and it was exposed for a long time. That was with the f stop at 4, the smallest it goes.
Do you have any ideas what i can do with this equipment or should i not bother