the holy grail..
Posted 28/01/2014 - 12:22
Link
stevejcoe wrote:
The 1.7 AF adapter was an hybrid, in that it was designed to provide AF functionality to non AF lenses as well as being a teleconverter. There may have been compromises made in the design because of that. So together with general advances in design the 1.4 may be better optically.
I sometimes use the AF 1.7x adapter together with my FA*300 f4.5, I find the optical quality of the 1.7x adapter to be of very high standards. I have yet to see any noticable image degradation due to the use of the 1.7x adapter. But, as many of you say, it is a product which has gone out of production. Pentax would benefit from having a decent teleconverter in their current product range. I would imagine that most (if not all) other major camera brands have a teleconconverter in their line-upThe 1.7 AF adapter was an hybrid, in that it was designed to provide AF functionality to non AF lenses as well as being a teleconverter. There may have been compromises made in the design because of that. So together with general advances in design the 1.4 may be better optically.
Regards
Bjørn
Posted 28/01/2014 - 12:27
Link
johnriley wrote:
The gasket is on the back of the lens jules, so it would be on the back of the converter.
Doh! Of course it will be using the gasket on the lens side for the other seal!The gasket is on the back of the lens jules, so it would be on the back of the converter.
Was hoping for some rubber on rubber action.
I agree with the others here however, it seems difficult to imagine what else they could have shoehorned into that tight space.
Oh stop it!
DrOrloff wrote:
I know people have been clamouring for this for ages now, I wonder what makes it the holy grail? The f1.7 converter seems to do a very good job with the right lenses. Will this be a significant improvement on that? WR is obviously welcome.
I know people have been clamouring for this for ages now, I wonder what makes it the holy grail? The f1.7 converter seems to do a very good job with the right lenses. Will this be a significant improvement on that? WR is obviously welcome.
People expect good focus tracking even with their TC's these days, we now have a body capable of it and with the DA*300 a reasonable (Not brilliantly quick) Lens. I think a lot of people (Me anyway) were hoping for an internal SDM/Screwdrive version of the 1.7AFA, which would not only have SDM contacts but be able to drive the lens a'la 1.7AFA to greater effect than the Lens alone. Don't know if I'm making sense here but still...
So enhanced SDM on lenses with the contacts and screwdrive for those without, this I think would have needed a much bigger convertor and I cannot see that there will be any internal motor in this convertor, so as others have said it's just a straight thru, just like the Tamron PZ, which unless they have managed a proper Pentax miniaturisation miracle, in turn means duff AF.
Electronics may save the day but this is starting to look like a re-vamp or fake, not something with the Pentax difference...
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 28/01/2014 - 13:07
Link
Light seems to be the main problem with these TC's. I've just tried the following on a Pentax MZ-S +DA*300mm f/4. They all work with screwdrive, but the 2X hunts worse than the 1.4x and 1.7x.... The screwdrive is very slow though. NO 2X will work with a Pentax APS-C Digital Camera.
Tamron 1.4x OK slow, but positive.
Jessop 1.7x OK slow, but positive.
Teleplus 2x Works..... hunts a bit... eventually gets there.
I'm surprised they haven't gone for a 1.7x and if it's a light problem the 1.4x might not even be that.
--
Tamron 1.4x OK slow, but positive.
Jessop 1.7x OK slow, but positive.
Teleplus 2x Works..... hunts a bit... eventually gets there.
I'm surprised they haven't gone for a 1.7x and if it's a light problem the 1.4x might not even be that.
--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 28/01/2014 - 14:56
Link
carmagw wrote:
Interestingly SRS currently have some new Kenko T/Cs for pentax, doubt these work with SDM though.
link
Regards
George
The one's they used to stock were screwdrive only, but it saysInterestingly SRS currently have some new Kenko T/Cs for pentax, doubt these work with SDM though.
link
Regards
George
made specially for SRS so it's worth asking Chris.
--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 28/01/2014 - 15:06
Link
The photo shows it has the moulding for the sdm but no actual contacts, which is a shame.
Algernon wrote:
made specially for SRS so it's worth asking Chris.
--
carmagw wrote:
Interestingly SRS currently have some new Kenko T/Cs for pentax, doubt these work with SDM though.
link
Regards
George
The one's they used to stock were screwdrive only, but it saysInterestingly SRS currently have some new Kenko T/Cs for pentax, doubt these work with SDM though.
link
Regards
George
made specially for SRS so it's worth asking Chris.
--
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Posted 28/01/2014 - 15:15
Link
cabstar wrote:
The photo shows it has the moulding for the sdm but no actual contacts, which is a shame.
SRS just use stock pictures and descriptions for TC's. So youThe photo shows it has the moulding for the sdm but no actual contacts, which is a shame.
really have to ask.
--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


3665 posts
18 years
Grimsby,
UK
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released