Suitable camera for food photography
Posted 31/12/2014 - 15:14 - Helpful Comment
Link
The most important part of food photography, more so than in other types, is lighting. I would say it needs to be a camera that can be used with an external flash that allows bounce, unless you have a very well lit environment for it.
Another important point is colour balance. Like people's skin, food can be made to look bad by even slightly incorrect colour balances, so the camera or available software needs to be able to account for any changes that might be needed.
Another important point is colour balance. Like people's skin, food can be made to look bad by even slightly incorrect colour balances, so the camera or available software needs to be able to account for any changes that might be needed.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Posted 31/12/2014 - 16:28 - Helpful Comment
Link
hi i would opt for a k10 and if you look on ebay they are doing lighting for about £100 pound i think they are in portsmouth if you are lucky yo can pick a k10 up for about that on there 2
regards stu
regards stu
Posted 31/12/2014 - 16:58
Link
Thank you both
Posted 31/12/2014 - 17:16 - Helpful Comment
Link
What about a K-01 Maria? You cannot beat the image quality for the price and it will take all of the Pentax lenses. It doesn't have a viewfinder, but this would not be any disadvantage for food photography. Also, it has 'focus peaking' which is a brilliant tool for manual focussing and would be great for ensuring critical foucus when shooting still life subjects such as food.
I'm not sure how you could beat this camera for under £200, you should be able to pick up a mint example for about £150.
Regards
David
I'm not sure how you could beat this camera for under £200, you should be able to pick up a mint example for about £150.
Regards
David
Posted 31/12/2014 - 17:23 - Helpful Comment
Link
I agree here the camera would not be king. The lighting is the essential factor...
K-1Gripped K-1 ungripped K-5ii K7 Various lenses
Stuart..
Stuart..
Posted 31/12/2014 - 17:31
Link
Thank you David and Stuart, i think she hasn't considered the price of lenses in this as well
Posted 31/12/2014 - 18:00 - Helpful Comment
Link
Totally agree with the lighting comments.
Lighting, camera and suitable lens for £200 - not easy.
Perhaps a bit of a left field suggestion but how about the original Q with the standard lens? Very capable combination and ridiculously cheap these days.
Carl
Lighting, camera and suitable lens for £200 - not easy.
Perhaps a bit of a left field suggestion but how about the original Q with the standard lens? Very capable combination and ridiculously cheap these days.
Carl
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Posted 31/12/2014 - 18:28 - Helpful Comment
Link
Just going to add that photos of hot food sitting near windows, or using window light, are really challenging for white balance if you are using interior lights as well.
What lenses would people be recommending for the food task?
What lenses would people be recommending for the food task?
Posted 31/12/2014 - 18:34 - Helpful Comment
Link
I think the key requirements for a 'food' lens are similar as for portraits ... ie a short to medium telephoto and a wide aperture prime is ideal for both sharpness and impact as well as the depth of field effects that are popular with food shots. I'm thinking something from 70mm upwards, f2.8 at least ....
Also macro, or at least 1:4 close focussing would be helpful.
But going back to the camera requirements, I do think off-camera flash (plus some kind of diffuser like a softbox) is going to be needed for regular consistent results. So the camera needs to provide wireless flash capability .... which I think all the current DSLRs do ? Not sure about the K-01 ?
Also macro, or at least 1:4 close focussing would be helpful.
But going back to the camera requirements, I do think off-camera flash (plus some kind of diffuser like a softbox) is going to be needed for regular consistent results. So the camera needs to provide wireless flash capability .... which I think all the current DSLRs do ? Not sure about the K-01 ?
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 31/12/2014 - 18:40 - Helpful Comment
Link
Another vote for the K-01 here , would work well paired with the Tamron 17-50 f2.8.
Could be picked up close to budget.
Could be picked up close to budget.
Sony A6000 plus a bunch of lenses
Sony A7ii plus loads of glass
Fuji X20
Sony A7ii plus loads of glass
Fuji X20
Posted 01/01/2015 - 17:24
Link
Thanks for all you help gentlemen
Posted 01/01/2015 - 18:34 - Helpful Comment
Link
I'd also recommend the MX-1. Although a compact it produces results that superb.
The lens has very close focus ability, with lovely bokeh possible.
The articulated screen will give very creative possibilities too.
Lighting is of course very important though!
The lens has very close focus ability, with lovely bokeh possible.
The articulated screen will give very creative possibilities too.
Lighting is of course very important though!
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
(For gallery, tips and links)
Posted 01/01/2015 - 19:51 - Helpful Comment
Link
Yes, the MX-1 would be much more suitable than a system camera.
The MX-1 has superb AWB but of course has custom WB as well.
It has a very sharp lens, has auto macro as well as a 1cm macro mode for those very close shots.
I'd definitely pick the MX-1 over any system camera for food shots.
For adjustable daylight lighting, a Metz Mecalight is perfect.
The MX-1 has superb AWB but of course has custom WB as well.
It has a very sharp lens, has auto macro as well as a 1cm macro mode for those very close shots.
I'd definitely pick the MX-1 over any system camera for food shots.
For adjustable daylight lighting, a Metz Mecalight is perfect.
Posted 05/01/2015 - 17:06
Link
Thanks everyone, having a look at the MX-1!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


473 posts
15 years
Derbyshire
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Maria-Gray-photography/589310071158079?ref=hl