Spitfire

thoughton
Posted 02/11/2009 - 10:12 Link
C&C please! Is this good, bad, or just pretentious?

I wish I had got the light (is that what it is?) a bit sharper, but in my defence it was very gloomy and my shutter speed was 1/25 (Forgot to set ISO after switching to a manual lens)

Taken at Duxford IWM yesterday.

Comment Image
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 02/11/2009 - 10:16
Father Ted
Posted 02/11/2009 - 10:17 Link
Doesn't work for me...sorry.
It seems like it is neither a close up of the light, nor a shot of the aircraft, but falls somewhere in between.
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
thoughton
Posted 02/11/2009 - 10:29 Link
No need to say sorry! I'd much rather have brutally honest opinions and improve my photography. If anything the C&C around here is usually too pleasant! (as Dr Mhuni has already mentioned in MikeP's sunset bench thread)
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 02/11/2009 - 10:32
Father Ted
Posted 02/11/2009 - 10:57 Link
Yeah...but seeing as I'm learning myself I don't like to criticise

Which is ironic as I too like the brutally honest advice
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
gartmore
Posted 02/11/2009 - 12:06 Link
I like it and it was precisely the sort of image I was looking for at the RAF Museum yesterday and failed to find. I think I'd crop out the cockpit and a third of the right hand sided, though.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Edited by gartmore: 02/11/2009 - 12:07
KenH
Posted 02/11/2009 - 14:15 Link
I Like the idea that I think was intended, but the foreground would need lots more detail to be an effective highlight against the OOF background - nice try though!
Photography is putting one’s head, one’s eye, and one’s heart on the same axis. HCB
K20D and various stuff.
mikew
Posted 03/11/2009 - 07:38 Link
Not pretentious at all I'd say but too busy I think. The idea of the sharp black light (?) is sound but then the triangle and roundel compete for attention. You could try desaturating them a little and see if that helps. I also agree that you can lose some of the cockpit (how did they get that name I wonder).

Nice colours!

Mike
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
mikew
Posted 03/11/2009 - 15:55 Link
Thank you
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
johnriley
Posted 03/11/2009 - 16:13 Link
It's a nice idea and I think it will work after it's cropped slightly as ken suggests.

In museums and similar places it's a challenge to produce images that don't give away where they are. This one is a bold idea and it does exactly what it needs to.

I like it.
Best regards, John
polchraine
Posted 03/11/2009 - 16:18 Link
I was scrolling down the comments and at one point just the lower third of the image was visible - that actually looked quite good.
.
K20D, *istD, MZ-S, Super-A, ME Super, MX
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, DA* 300,
DA 50-200, FA 24-90, FA 20-35,
M 400-600, A 50 f1.4, A 28 f2.8, A 70-210, M 35-80, M 50 f1.7
A x2S teleconverter and a few others ...
thoughton
Posted 03/11/2009 - 17:38 Link
Thanks for the comments everyone! Glad to hear it isn't completely useless

I tried a tighter crop as suggested by Ken, it looks pretty good to me! I was concerned the lack of the cockpit might make the background harder to identify, but it seems okay:

Comment Image
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
johnriley
Posted 03/11/2009 - 17:45 Link
Final tweak eliminating the bottom right dark area and you've got it!
Best regards, John

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo