waterlily
Posted 05/09/2009 - 22:41
Link
I like it a lot. Specially in monochrome. You might consider a split tone treatment to give it a bit more warmth.
And maybe crop of the top, just above the highest leaf. There would be enough water left to keep it in context,
but you would eliminate the distracting (to my eyes) highlights top left corner.
Martin.
And maybe crop of the top, just above the highest leaf. There would be enough water left to keep it in context,
but you would eliminate the distracting (to my eyes) highlights top left corner.
Martin.
Posted 05/09/2009 - 22:48
Link
I like it. Can not help thinking it looks like a film negative.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 05/09/2009 - 22:51
Link
I like B&W and this is good. As Martin suggested maybe just a bit of the top.
Steve
K20D, DA16-45mm f4, M 50mm f1.7, M 28mm f3.5 & Tamron 70-300
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pothers/
K20D, DA16-45mm f4, M 50mm f1.7, M 28mm f3.5 & Tamron 70-300
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pothers/
Posted 06/09/2009 - 13:05
Link
Nice shot Aiki. While I can see why you have kept the upper part in - interesting effect on the water - I reckon Martin's right. If you crop above the highest leaf you do retain some of the water effect.
B&W nice too - though it would be interesting to see it in colour.
B&W nice too - though it would be interesting to see it in colour.
Posted 06/09/2009 - 16:44
Link
Thanks alot !
Mhuni is right - I really liked the effect of water. At the same time it took away may attention from the lily. My eye even didnt get to the light water left top.... You went further, Martin ! Thanks !
I also tried to leave some of the tones (desaturating) but I was not good on it Should I use sth else ?
John, what does mean "definition in dark parts of lily" ?
Mike, yes, it is nice in color. But this time I somehow prefer BW. I even do not know why.
To give you the idea, I post the original too.
Barrie, original explanes also why it looks like negative

Mhuni is right - I really liked the effect of water. At the same time it took away may attention from the lily. My eye even didnt get to the light water left top.... You went further, Martin ! Thanks !
I also tried to leave some of the tones (desaturating) but I was not good on it Should I use sth else ?
John, what does mean "definition in dark parts of lily" ?
Mike, yes, it is nice in color. But this time I somehow prefer BW. I even do not know why.
To give you the idea, I post the original too.
Barrie, original explanes also why it looks like negative

Posted 06/09/2009 - 22:22
Link
Personally I think it is very hard to have such a strong colour in the flower with relatively weak colours elsewhere and for me the flower was too dark in B&W.
Each to his and her own choice I think.
Mike
Each to his and her own choice I think.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 06/09/2009 - 23:31
Link
Aiki, what I mean, is, that on my screen, the centre of the lilly looks like a dark 'blob', all black, while the colour version you have shown has varying tones.
So, I suppose what I was saying, was, maybe you could lighten the centre of the lilly a little to show these tones .
So, I suppose what I was saying, was, maybe you could lighten the centre of the lilly a little to show these tones .
Posted 07/09/2009 - 01:55
Link
Beautiful shots in b&w and in colour
Posted 07/09/2009 - 06:40
Link
Thanks John and Mike.
I try to get the lily not so black. Thanks for good advice !
I see it now
Mike, I dont say the color is bad, but there is also a good chance for BW. I just want to try it.
The color version is not READY also (as original) sth has to be done there as well. I have less ideas for that.
I try to get the lily not so black. Thanks for good advice !
I see it now
Mike, I dont say the color is bad, but there is also a good chance for BW. I just want to try it.
The color version is not READY also (as original) sth has to be done there as well. I have less ideas for that.
Posted 07/09/2009 - 09:48
Link
Aiki,
I love the shot as it is in B&W. I can understand the argument for a tighter crop but I love the effect of the light on the water so if you do crop then keep some of the water!
Personally I like B&W flower shots ever since I went to a Mapplethorpe Exhibition in London in the 80's
Cheerz MZ
I love the shot as it is in B&W. I can understand the argument for a tighter crop but I love the effect of the light on the water so if you do crop then keep some of the water!
Personally I like B&W flower shots ever since I went to a Mapplethorpe Exhibition in London in the 80's
Cheerz MZ
K5, K7, Nikon FA.
AF Lenses: DA15mm Ltd, DA21mm Limited, DA35mmAL, DA50mm f1.8, DA18-55mmWR, FA28-70mm f4AL, DA50-200mmWR,Tamron SP70-200mm f2.8, AF70-300mm LD Di, SP10-24mm, SP90mm Macro.
MF Lenses: SMC-A 50mm, Adaptall 24mm(CW-24), 135mm(03B), 35-70mm(17A) 80-210mm(03A), Micro-Nikkor55mm, Soligor I-S 200mm f2.8 AIS
My Flickr - link
My Photobucket - link
AF Lenses: DA15mm Ltd, DA21mm Limited, DA35mmAL, DA50mm f1.8, DA18-55mmWR, FA28-70mm f4AL, DA50-200mmWR,Tamron SP70-200mm f2.8, AF70-300mm LD Di, SP10-24mm, SP90mm Macro.
MF Lenses: SMC-A 50mm, Adaptall 24mm(CW-24), 135mm(03B), 35-70mm(17A) 80-210mm(03A), Micro-Nikkor55mm, Soligor I-S 200mm f2.8 AIS
My Flickr - link
My Photobucket - link
Posted 11/09/2009 - 20:38
Link
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.




694 posts
18 years
Estonia
----
Pentax K20D; SMC DA 18-55mm II kit; Sigma AF 70-300/4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
GIMP Flickr
PPG