Samsung GX-15 announced
Posted 24/01/2006 - 19:00
Link
Their Pro 815 camera uses DNG
Hopefully they'll carry that on
On that note Arthur Dent, check out www.openraw.org
Matt
Hopefully they'll carry that on
On that note Arthur Dent, check out www.openraw.org
Matt
Posted 25/01/2006 - 12:02
Link
Arthur,
I've just checked the DPReview of the 815, and they say the RAW files are large and slow. One thing that should be emphasised is to use DNG with Huffman encoding - that's what the Adobe DNG convertor uses
If you don't use the Huffman encoding option then the DNG files are as large as Pentax's PEF files. As always, it's a tradeoff between processing speed and card-write speed. That is to say, that doing Huffman encoding takes significant processing time, but means you're doing less card writing - so one trades off the other somewhat.
Matt
I've just checked the DPReview of the 815, and they say the RAW files are large and slow. One thing that should be emphasised is to use DNG with Huffman encoding - that's what the Adobe DNG convertor uses
If you don't use the Huffman encoding option then the DNG files are as large as Pentax's PEF files. As always, it's a tradeoff between processing speed and card-write speed. That is to say, that doing Huffman encoding takes significant processing time, but means you're doing less card writing - so one trades off the other somewhat.
Matt
Posted 25/01/2006 - 12:09
Link
I should be very surprised if this first camera produces anything other than PEF files. For the futue, who knows.
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 24/02/2010 - 09:28
Link
Discountshop wrote:
I think sony is btter than samsung because sony introduce newest advances feature in their model
Nice to see somebody has their finger on the pulse of changing technology .I think sony is btter than samsung because sony introduce newest advances feature in their model
This topic is over 4 years old, and Sony bought a company for its technology (Konica Minolta), rather than re-invent the wheel.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 24/02/2010 - 09:31
Link
Actually its a spammer Peter.
Er Mods, the user name should give a clue
Er Mods, the user name should give a clue
Bodies: GX20 | MZ-3 | MZ-M | Auto 110 complete kit
Primes: DA*300 F4 | DA40 F2.8 Ltd. | SMC-A 50/1.7 | Sigma 30mm F1.4 | Sirius 28/2.8
Macro : SMC-A Dental 100 macro
Zooms: 12-24 SA | 18-55 SA | 50-200 SA | 28-80 FA | 35-80 F | Vivitar 28-200
Other: Bellows | Tube sets | Vivitar 2x PK/A Tele | SEF-36PZF Flash | SBG-D1V Grip | Billingham 335
My Flickr
Primes: DA*300 F4 | DA40 F2.8 Ltd. | SMC-A 50/1.7 | Sigma 30mm F1.4 | Sirius 28/2.8
Macro : SMC-A Dental 100 macro
Zooms: 12-24 SA | 18-55 SA | 50-200 SA | 28-80 FA | 35-80 F | Vivitar 28-200
Other: Bellows | Tube sets | Vivitar 2x PK/A Tele | SEF-36PZF Flash | SBG-D1V Grip | Billingham 335
My Flickr
Posted 24/02/2010 - 10:34
Link
The interview with Ned Bunnell featured in an earlier thread in this forum might give a clue as to what Pentax proposes to do, within Hoya's strategic context?
Samsung = Volume; Pentax = Primes plus the 'niche / boutique' market on one interpretation? On Ned Bunnell's account, that is how Pentax have situated their prime lenses in the market, and would be seeking to leverage off and capitalise on those...
My take and paraphrase - Pentax is about the good glass: most everything else is commoditised (and like all consumer items that are commoditised, subject to fierce competition predominantly on price).
Samsung = Volume; Pentax = Primes plus the 'niche / boutique' market on one interpretation? On Ned Bunnell's account, that is how Pentax have situated their prime lenses in the market, and would be seeking to leverage off and capitalise on those...
My take and paraphrase - Pentax is about the good glass: most everything else is commoditised (and like all consumer items that are commoditised, subject to fierce competition predominantly on price).
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



459 posts
21 years
Sector Z-Z-9-plural-Z-Alpha
It's already used by some cameras and medium format backs.
It's fully documented, available to anyone, and has fields for all the fancy proprietary stuff that you could want. Wake up, camera makers, get over yourselves!!
OK, end of rant.