red lips

K10D
Posted 27/06/2010 - 23:22 Link
Loose the sun and use flash....

red lips

Comment Image


K7, 100mm macro,-2ev flash and -1ev on camera. f/8, ISO 100

Worth experimenting further?

C&C welcome.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 27/06/2010 - 23:24
dougf8
Posted 28/06/2010 - 00:48 Link
Lovely and sharp, perhaps you could back it down even further.

I see the lips, almost as though they are dehydrated by the flash. Faded/aged glory. There's a nice series of different slightly past their best blooms. You won't sell many on mother's day though.
Lurking is shirking.!
techno-terminator
Posted 28/06/2010 - 07:38 Link
What a fascinating pic !

I could look at that and just look at different individual petals for ages . There's plenty of texture as well.

The only thing I don't like [ sorry about that ] is the teeny bit of white/greenish stuff showing - what is it ? It detracts from the rest .

Congratulations on a worthwhile bit of experimentation [ perhaps one day I will .................... ]
let the education continue

proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
K10D
Posted 28/06/2010 - 07:46 Link
techno-terminator wrote:
What a fascinating pic !

The only thing I don't like [ sorry about that ] is the teeny bit of white/greenish stuff showing - what is it ? It detracts from the rest .
It looks like part of a dead leaf. No problem with the comment though.

I rarely remove things from an image. I will clone this one as once you have mentioned it, it stays in the mind.

By the way, if you do have a play, a cut down 35mm transparent film canister makes a good diffuser for the pop-up flash.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
George Lazarette
Posted 28/06/2010 - 07:55 Link
Great texture and three-dimensionality. Your diffuser has worked very well.

I don't object to the foliage. Adds context.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
K10D
Posted 28/06/2010 - 08:02 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Great texture and three-dimensionality. Your diffuser has worked very well.

I don't object to the foliage. Adds context.

G
Thanks George. Just literally removed the foliage for comparison.

Comment Image


Regards
Too far from a shore.
bwlchmawr
Posted 28/06/2010 - 10:49 Link
Better without the foliage, I think. This is an interesting study. How nice to see an imperfect bloom when we usually seek out bright, fresh examples. The faded petals look like bruises. The flash technique is not naturalistic but adds something else. I like the title too, very suitable.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
techno-terminator
Posted 28/06/2010 - 10:57 Link
I'm in two minds about the foliage -

if it's intended as a study of red lips - then yes it's better without foliage [ though I would still like to see that white/greenish thing removed - yes I'm picky that way ]

if it's intended as a study of a fading rose with its interesting petals - then yes leave the foliage in .

OK - I know - that has not helped
let the education continue

proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo