Common Tern

Mike-P
Posted 27/06/2010 - 15:27 Link
Went back to the same place as last week to see if I could get a better shot of this bird. Last time I used the K20D and 60-250mm .. this week it was the Sigma 100-300mm f4.

Just the one shot

Comment Image
techno-terminator
Posted 27/06/2010 - 16:39 Link
WOW !!

I think you could count every feather .

Congratulations - a beautiful shot of a bird in motion. That beak is so sharp
let the education continue

proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Pentaxophile
Posted 27/06/2010 - 16:49 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Just the one shot
But what a shot!
George Lazarette
Posted 27/06/2010 - 17:15 Link
As someone who has shot a few terns in his time, I have to say that this is an excellent shot. They're small birds, and they move fast.

Well done.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
matwhittington
Posted 27/06/2010 - 17:51 Link
Echo all the above - a cracker!

Regards
Mat W

My Flickr: link
flossie
Posted 27/06/2010 - 18:16 Link
Just save that picture for the next time someone says "...you can't go Birding with a Pentax...".

Great shot, I love the shades of individual shades of gray on each feather...
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
bwlchmawr
Posted 27/06/2010 - 18:38 Link
A super shot. Interesting and lovely bird too. As a matter of interest, how many "rejects" did it take to come up with this beauty, Mike?
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Mike-P
Posted 27/06/2010 - 20:49 Link
Cheers for the comments .. just printed it out, looks pretty good.


bwlchmawr wrote:
As a matter of interest, how many "rejects" did it take to come up with this beauty, Mike?
I have a series of them, about 6 or 7 that are all much the same as this but different angles .. I preferred this one.

I probably binned about the same amount but that was mainly because they were further away and needed a lot more cropping.
Edited by Mike-P: 27/06/2010 - 20:49
terje-l
Posted 27/06/2010 - 20:58 Link
As one who have never been able to catch a sharp shot of a bird in flight, I admire your work, Mike. My Sigma 70-300 APO DG should be capable enough, I guess it just takes practice, practice, practice.

Apart from a sharp shot, you even managed to place the bird in the right position. (Or is that a clever crop
Best regards
Terry

K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Edited by terje-l: 27/06/2010 - 21:00
Snootchies
Posted 27/06/2010 - 21:07 Link
terje-l wrote:
(Or is that a clever crop
I don't think it matters...for it's the end result which does.
Bob

My website (Hadfield Photography)

Pentax Gallery Artist page:link

Flickr Photostream: link
terje-l
Posted 27/06/2010 - 21:15 Link
Agreed, Bob. I know Mike is good, I just wanted to know if he's that good
Best regards
Terry

K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Snootchies
Posted 27/06/2010 - 21:19 Link
Crikey - up the pressure why don't you....
Bob

My website (Hadfield Photography)

Pentax Gallery Artist page:link

Flickr Photostream: link
Mike-P
Posted 27/06/2010 - 22:08 Link
terje-l wrote:

Apart from a sharp shot, you even managed to place the bird in the right position. (Or is that a clever crop
Of course the bird was in the right position, I wouldn't dream of cropping a photo to make something look better.
fatspider
Posted 28/06/2010 - 13:11 Link
Quote:
I know Mike is good, I just wanted to know if he's that good
Not really if he was THAT good there would be a catchlight in the birds eye and a fish in its mouth......and I'd want to see a catchlight in the fishes eye too

It is a tremendous shot but the PP is lacking, hence the dust spot below the birds tail and towards the edge of the page

I knew I'd find something wrong if I looked hard enough
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
Mike-P
Posted 28/06/2010 - 13:22 Link
fatspider wrote:

Not really if he was THAT good there would be a catchlight in the birds eye and a fish in its mouth
Focus not quite there and the pose wasn't as good but ....


Comment Image


Comment Image

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo