Raynox/Extension tubes
Posted 16/11/2008 - 13:51
Link
I have the 150 version and the few shots I've taken with it seem very sharp. I keep it with my 'lightweight' kit for when I don't want to carry heavy macro lenses around.
I don't know what the differences are between the 150 and 250, sorry.
I don't know what the differences are between the 150 and 250, sorry.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 16/11/2008 - 17:23
Link
Have you considered buying used? theres nothing much to go wrong with extension tubes and as theres no glass involved it doesn't really matter on the make.
I dont know if the Kenko ones you mention are Auto AF or just Auto, but I would have thought a good set of used "A" mount tubes would cost less than £40, and your going to want to focus manually anyway.
I dont know if the Kenko ones you mention are Auto AF or just Auto, but I would have thought a good set of used "A" mount tubes would cost less than £40, and your going to want to focus manually anyway.
Posted 17/11/2008 - 05:10
Link
I've been keeping an eye out for secondhand ones, but very little has come up of late. Thought the Raynox might be an acceptable alternative - and perhaps more convenient than extension tubes, as they fit on the front of the lens.
Re. the difference between the Raynox 150 & 250 - I think it's magnificiation, though haven't properly investigated this yet.
Re. the difference between the Raynox 150 & 250 - I think it's magnificiation, though haven't properly investigated this yet.
Posted 17/11/2008 - 13:35
Link
I bought Pentax K fit Vivitar tubes for £38 brand new from Jessops.They work on my digital and film Pentaxes OK.
Been a member of Pentax Club since the Ron Spillman era! Got COMPUTERISED at last - DIGITISED?
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Posted 18/11/2008 - 09:07
Link
As it has glass in it, it will have an inferior performance to using tubes. We did source Kenko ones for a while which were very good, but they have ceased production.
We have an alternative tube option for £12 that we're about to add to our system. It's a set of three screw thread tubes with a K bayonet mount at each end. You can unscrew and take out any combination of the three interior screw thread tubes to change extension, giving a choice of four magnifications.
We have an alternative tube option for £12 that we're about to add to our system. It's a set of three screw thread tubes with a K bayonet mount at each end. You can unscrew and take out any combination of the three interior screw thread tubes to change extension, giving a choice of four magnifications.
Posted 19/11/2008 - 09:55
Link
Dr. Mhuni wrote:
Just did a search on Jessops and all I came up with was some 6x7 tubes at £270! Did you get your Vivtar tubes recently?
I got them must have been about 10 years ago.
Just did a search on Jessops and all I came up with was some 6x7 tubes at £270! Did you get your Vivtar tubes recently?
Been a member of Pentax Club since the Ron Spillman era! Got COMPUTERISED at last - DIGITISED?
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Posted 19/11/2008 - 10:41
Link
The tubes are now online. Pentax K fit Extension Tube Set.
Problems you will encounter. The tubes don't cock the aperture lever open so a lens without an aperture ring, like the modern DA's etc will be operating at the smallest aperture. This makes it impossible to focus, and results in a long shutter speed.
Therefore the tubes are best used on lenses with manual aperture rings. I'd probably use them with an old 50mm f/1.7, or 100mm if I needed more camera to subject distance.
When using them to take the photos in the link above I used a blob of Blu-Tack to lock the aperture stop down lever open at mid aperture, so I could focus and use a more useful "optimum" aperture.
Quote:
Could you tell me what information they relay from/to the lens.
There is no coupling whatsoever. Totally manual. I've tried them on the K20D using the standard 18-55mm lens. This lens is not the ideal one but you'll see from the link above it's still really good quality.Could you tell me what information they relay from/to the lens.
Problems you will encounter. The tubes don't cock the aperture lever open so a lens without an aperture ring, like the modern DA's etc will be operating at the smallest aperture. This makes it impossible to focus, and results in a long shutter speed.
Therefore the tubes are best used on lenses with manual aperture rings. I'd probably use them with an old 50mm f/1.7, or 100mm if I needed more camera to subject distance.
When using them to take the photos in the link above I used a blob of Blu-Tack to lock the aperture stop down lever open at mid aperture, so I could focus and use a more useful "optimum" aperture.
Posted 22/11/2008 - 08:23
Link
Thanks for that info Peter. Though I would prefer tubes which at least allow you to make some auto-adjustments, as I will probably use them with my DA zooms.
Can anyone clarify something for me - am I right in thinking that tubes referred to as 'Auto' do have some coupling that allows for adjustments to be made from the camera (though only the more expensive ones enable auto-focus)?
Can anyone clarify something for me - am I right in thinking that tubes referred to as 'Auto' do have some coupling that allows for adjustments to be made from the camera (though only the more expensive ones enable auto-focus)?
Posted 22/11/2008 - 09:24
Link
With tubes, the word 'auto' usually refers to 'automatic diaphragm and nothing else. I have jessops own brand ones which have all but one of the Pentax K electrical contacts. Mannesty discovered that by scraping a little of the paint of the tubes, thereby creating another contact they work perfectly with the newest lenses. BTW you wouldn't want auto focus when using extension tubes. As Peter rightly says, zooms are not a good choice for this sort of work. A 50mm prime would be ideal. Pentax used to make a 50mm Bellows lens specifically for close up work which had no focusing ring.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 26/11/2008 - 21:56
Link
You might search for a Vivitar 2x macro converter. It is an excellent piece of kit giving up to 1:1 macro and often for less money than extension tubes.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1425 posts
18 years
Geneva
Anyway, £120 is too much - it's approaching the price I could get a new macro lens for from a shop (when you take off the tax I get off as a non-UK resident). But I've just come across the Raynox 250 52-67 Close Up, and this looks like a cheap alernative - a good way to start macro perhaps? (Also seen there is a 150 - is one better to start with than the other?)
Can anyone tell me what the quality of the Raynox is like compared to Tubes?
500px