Prime?
Ok, I'm an noob and I admit it. Will someone tell me, please, just what is a "prime"? The converter I understand and will probably purchase one shortly. I'm happy with the 55-300, but I want to reach out further and Bigma is out of the question just now.
Thanks.
And my teachers taught me that people who admit they don't know something are actually smarter than those who always think and act like they know everything.
My Flickr
My PPG
The Rotary Shutter
They do have issues of their own and may not necessarily solve your problems.
then
neil
pentax k3
DA* 300 f4 DA* 50-135 f 2.8 smc DA* 16-50 f2.8 50mm f1.7 pentax1.4xhd converter
Panasonic Dmc Fz200
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Telephoto always used to refer to anything longer than the 50mm standard lens, and wide angle to anything shorter.
Telephoto always used to refer to anything longer than the 50mm standard lens, and wide angle to anything shorter.
The F 100-300 is only a telephoto when zoom ed to beyond 170mm, whilst several of my 50mm lenses are telephotos at least when focused on infinity...
I think you'll find it's one of those words here the definition has changed. In a similar way that many companies sell 'macro' zooms that can't even get near to 1/2 life size on the recording medium - true macro should be 1:1 or closer.
At least with the changed definition of telephoto it improves the usefulness of the term!
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
Telephoto always used to refer to anything longer than the 50mm standard lens, and wide angle to anything shorter.
The F 100-300 is only a telephoto when zoom ed to beyond 170mm, whilst several of my 50mm lenses are telephotos at least when focused on infinity...
I think you'll find it's one of those words here the definition has changed. In a similar way that many companies sell 'macro' zooms that can't even get near to 1/2 life size on the recording medium - true macro should be 1:1 or closer.
At least with the changed definition of telephoto it improves the usefulness of the term!
So my 100mm macro stops being a telephoto if I focus close-up?
The F 100-300 is only a telephoto when zoom ed to beyond 170mm, whilst several of my 50mm lenses are telephotos at least when focused on infinity...
I think you'll find it's one of those words here the definition has changed. In a similar way that many companies sell 'macro' zooms that can't even get near to 1/2 life size on the recording medium - true macro should be 1:1 or closer.
At least with the changed definition of telephoto it improves the usefulness of the term!
I know what the term means in practice - I use it that way myself and I'm not going to the stake about this. But no reason not to know the technical meaning as far as I can see? (And my 100mm macro may not be a telephoto even at infinity since it's always > 100mm - just - from front element to sensor plane)
(And my 100mm macro may not be a telephoto even at infinity since it's always > 100mm - just - from front element to sensor plane)
I guess the 500mm Newtonian telescope I have is actually only telephoto if used with an eyepiece (and the camera of course) - it must be about 1m long
[pedant mode off]
Time for bed.
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
I see your adding the rear flange distance now (Your original definition only mentioned the length of the lens) Mine is ~95mm with both caps on.
I guess the 500mm Newtonian telescope I have is actually only telephoto if used with an eyepiece (and the camera of course) - it must be about 1m long
[pedant mode off]
Time for bed.
For a telephoto lens, the optical length is measured with the magnification ratio when the lens is focused at infinity. Note that the focal length of telephoto quit often changes a lot when it's close focused, especially the "internal focusing" ones.
The physical length of a lens has nothing to do with the focal length since the optical center might be way behind the front lens element.
Enough already. It's like having Stefan back!
But to repeat my question to wuttwutt, what is it you are hoping your teleconverter will do for you? Don't want to see you making a purchase you might regret.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


12 posts
15 years
Thanks.