pixel shift tests come back very positive

mattox
Posted 06/06/2015 - 16:53 Link
very interesting article. Amazing differences and very very notable sharpness: Its a pitty that using pixel shift will take up so much memory especially when shooting in RAW
Darkmunk
Posted 06/06/2015 - 17:31 Link
What article?
Posted 06/06/2015 - 17:46 Link
Why would it take up extra space? The final image is the same pixel size, just for each pixel my understanding is it has a true colour reading rather than being processed from a single colour algorithm, where they take an educated interpretation as such.
Pint o' rough & a game o' darts anyone
mattox
Posted 06/06/2015 - 18:01 Link
mattox
Posted 06/06/2015 - 18:03 Link
InFESTation wrote:
Why would it take up extra space? The final image is the same pixel size, just for each pixel my understanding is it has a true colour reading rather than being processed from a single colour algorithm, where they take an educated interpretation as such.
In raw the Pentax K-3 II's Pixel Shift Resolution images have about 3.7 to 3.8 times the file size of a standard raw file. You can expect some very, very large file sizes if you intend to shoot in raw format using Pixel Shift Resolution, on the order of 121-122MB even at base sensitivity, and likely even larger as your ISO sensitivity setting climbs. That's equally true of Olympus' rival, though, with file sizes of around 100MB for its High Resolution-mode raw files, about five times the size of its standard raws.
Posted 06/06/2015 - 19:29 Link
Thanks, good info, I was surprised on the extra size still but the results I reckon are definitely worth it, I hope this does filter down to the existing models.
Pint o' rough & a game o' darts anyone
SteveLedger
Posted 06/06/2015 - 21:10 Link
InFESTation wrote:
I hope this does filter down to the existing models.
How? Via a firmware patch? Doubt that's even possible..
Even if it was, it would be unlikely that Pentax would want to interfere with sales of the K-3II.
Edited by SteveLedger: 06/06/2015 - 21:11
McGregNi
Posted 06/06/2015 - 21:17 Link
And maybe they should send anyone who wants it a free GPS astrotracing module, with instructions on how to remove your built-in flash and fit the module ....
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Edited by McGregNi: 06/06/2015 - 21:17
Darkmunk
Posted 06/06/2015 - 23:32 Link
Looks amazing.
Glad the mighty Zed hasn't been replaced just yet tho'
davidstorm
Posted 06/06/2015 - 23:54 Link
Very impressive indeed. The Pentax images to my eye are significantly better than those from the Nikon D810, albeit the subject has to be stationary.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
richandfleur
Posted 07/06/2015 - 00:16 Link
SteveLedger wrote:
InFESTation wrote:
I hope this does filter down to the existing models.
How? Via a firmware patch? Doubt that's even possible..
Even if it was, it would be unlikely that Pentax would want to interfere with sales of the K-3II.
Obviously depends on how it's done.
If it's using the sensor shift, and nothing else, then it should be possible.
It's supposed to be tripod based, so that new gyro bit wouldn't be in use if the camera is stationary.

On the surface it looks like it should be possible on other models with sensor shift tech.
Just needs a firmware update to enable the feature on older models.
Chances of that with Pentax?...
SteveLedger
Posted 07/06/2015 - 00:17 Link
Zero....
It would hurt their K-3II sales.
Dave-L
Posted 07/06/2015 - 02:21 Link
... And pixel-shift may have needed a physically upgraded SR system.
K3/K5/10-17fisheye/15mmDA Ltd/18-55WR/55-300DA/100DFAMacroWR/50F1.4M/200F4M/DA*200F2.8/DA*300F4/DA*50-135/DA*60-250/Mitsuki 400F5.6/others.
alfpics
Posted 07/06/2015 - 12:31 Link
Dave-L wrote:
... And pixel-shift may have needed a physically upgraded SR system.
to be accurate within less than a pixel!
Andy
Stuey
Posted 07/06/2015 - 14:33 Link
Very interesting

Just imagine how this technology may work with a high res full frame model

It may well be limited due to the need for static subjects but many subjects are static - I will sit back and watch with interest
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo