Pet Photography

gartmore
Posted 18/02/2007 - 20:28 Link
Don,

You are right but sometimes on these pages people post or link to pics that are so small that any discussion about their resolution etc. is rendered pointless, sometimes, 'more is more'!

I wil post a link to some of my Canadian (small) pictures later this week, I'll be very interested in comments from you natives.

Ken
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Don
Posted 18/02/2007 - 21:53 Link
pete, I reread my post from this morning (before my morning coffee, though that's no excuse), and it doesn't read the way it was intended....I was not trying to be so critical, my goal was to offer some money making advice you could cash in on, but it reads more like a criticism. Please forgive if I offended.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
petekd
Posted 19/02/2007 - 08:01 Link
Quote:
pete, I reread my post from this morning (before my morning coffee, though that's no excuse), and it doesn't read the way it was intended....I was not trying to be so critical, my goal was to offer some money making advice you could cash in on, but it reads more like a criticism. Please forgive if I offended.
None taken No Problem

I enjoy criticism anyway i get enough from posting my pic

Pete
petekd
Posted 19/02/2007 - 08:12 Link
Quote:
petekd wrote:
.....if you can afford the extra go for the newer model
QUOTE BY GEORGE

Quote:
The K10D is not a newer model, it's a different model. It has several disadvantages compared to the K100D:
It is considerably more expensive.
It is bigger.
It is heavier.
It produces bigger files, which means you get fewer pictures on a card, need more hard disk space, and can't edit the pictures so quickly.
It doesn't offer ISO 3200.
It doesn't take AA batteries

For any or some or all of these reasons, the OP might be better served by the K100D, which is a superb camera for the money.[/quote:85fca11dc0]Not being Cynical of your negative comments George but here are my thoughts in RED

It is considerably more expensive. much more features
It is bigger. more pro like handling
It is heavier. solid build to with stand impact
It produces bigger files, which means you get fewer pictures on a card,
need more hard disk space, and can't edit the pictures so quickly.
bigger pictures better quality large prints(more mp)

It doesn't offer ISO 3200. interesting point how important is ISO 3200 (Just posing the question)It doesn't take

AA batteries no comment
johnriley
Posted 19/02/2007 - 09:04 Link
Please bear in mind that in Internet-Speak (so to speak) using capitalisation is interpreted as shouting, and I'm sure you didn't mean to shout. I don't know if shouting in red means shouting even louder....

Best regards, John
petekd
Posted 19/02/2007 - 10:24 Link
Ok Folks,

I like a good constructive debate so here goes

The K100 is a good camera of that there is no doubt but it cannot be compared to the K10D

The K10D is a semi pro model and a major upgrade from the K100 and therefore one is paying for that in its own right.

Whether the price difference between the K10d and the K100 is justified is another issue.

However if the two where lab tested side by side im sure the K10D would win hands down. It does not mean the K100 is a bad camera just not in the same catagory as the K10D so i suppose it is unfar to make any comparison.

It really depends what you want from photography and how far you want to take it. The K100 is capable of many things including producing great images. The K10D is for more advanced users or people willing to learn many different techniques and use its features to the max.

Deciding between the two is down to personal choice. Me personally i would go with the K10D and enjoy its capability and many new features which one can learn.

Your thoughts

Pete
Daniel Bridge
Posted 19/02/2007 - 11:40 Link
For cats, I would suggest either:

Cats that are calm, and who'll just sit and watch you as if to say "What are you doing?"
Comment Image


Playing with the cat until it falls asleep.
Comment Image


Using a toy to attract it's attention.
Comment Image


I wouldn't bother trying to sit it somewhere it doesn't want to be - find out where it sits, then work around it.

Dan

P.S. These were all taken on Provia 400, and all I can say is 'How much grain???'. Makes you glad to be shooting digital now.
johnriley
Posted 19/02/2007 - 11:46 Link
That black cat is fantastic.
Best regards, John
Daniel Bridge
Posted 19/02/2007 - 12:06 Link
Ah, thanks John, she's mine. I think she's fantastic too.

Taken with a 50mm lens (on 35mm film), can't remember the aperture, but probably around f/4 or 5.6, lit by the window in front door (door used to be mostly glass, and faces north), metered from a grey card.

We'd just had the new carpet on the stairs, and I thought she'd look nice against it. I seem to remember wiggling my finger above the lens to make her look.

Dan
Don
Posted 19/02/2007 - 12:16 Link
getting the black on black and maintaining seperation from the background is always tricky. well done!
reminds me of a cat we used to have named Diva.
I adopted her from the pound (her incredible green eyes and jet black fur hooked me.)
My best friend showed up at my house in his custom toyota 4x4 (his pride and joy. He took one look, then a second and proclaimed "It's that damn cat!"
turns out my new cat used to be his neighbours old cat.
his neighbours old cat used to climb all over his custom paint on the warm hood of his toyota....finally got caught by animal crontrol....

"That F@@#$$%N cat's possesed. get it off my truck please..."
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
George Lazarette
Posted 19/02/2007 - 22:46 Link
Quote:
Ok Folks,

I like a good constructive debate so here goes

The K100 is a good camera of that there is no doubt but it cannot be compared to the K10D...........

Pete
We know all that, Pete. We are not comparing cameras, we are debating whether an admitted novice (that's you) with no absolutely no knowledge of the original poster's needs (and not much knowledge of photography) should tell him that he has chosen the wrong camera.

The only information you have to go on is that he said he is budget-conscious. Now I may be stupid, and you may be clever, but to me that information suggests the choice of a less expensive camera rather than a more expensive camera. But that's just silly old me.

Now go and take some pictures. When you have ten years experience, come back and start telling people what cameras they ought to buy.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
George Lazarette
Posted 19/02/2007 - 22:49 Link
Quote:
boy do feel sorry for anybody with dial-up trying to read this page...lol
That's me, at the moment.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
johnriley
Posted 19/02/2007 - 23:15 Link
We're hoping to come over to the Isle of Man in April, George, perhaps we could buy you a drink?
Best regards, John
George Lazarette
Posted 19/02/2007 - 23:36 Link
Quote:
We're hoping to come over to the Isle of Man in April, George, perhaps we could buy you a drink?
It would be a great pleasure to meet you, John. Let me know when you are planning to come.

Note to others: JR is one of the most experienced photographers on this list, and his example is always worth following. So when he says to me: "perhaps we could buy you a drink?", don't hesitate to do the same.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
petekd
Posted 20/02/2007 - 08:02 Link
Quote:
petekd wrote:
Ok Folks,

I like a good constructive debate so here goes

The K100 is a good camera of that there is no doubt but it cannot be compared to the K10D...........

Pete
We know all that, Pete. We are not comparing cameras, we are debating whether an admitted novice (that's you) with no absolutely no knowledge of the original poster's needs (and not much knowledge of photography) should tell him that he has chosen the wrong camera.

The only information you have to go on is that he said he is budget-conscious. Now I may be stupid, and you may be clever, but to me that information suggests the choice of a less expensive camera rather than a more expensive camera. But that's just silly old me.

Now go and take some pictures. When you have ten years experience, come back and start telling people what cameras they ought to buy.

G
i dont tell people what to buy, its called general advice !!!

George you really have got your back up over this, I have simply stated facts whether i have ten years experience or not is not the point. As for telling people what camera to buy I dont ! i read lots, and take in advice from people like you and others and pass it on. Please dont presume what you dont know about me. I have been doing photography (not SLR) for 15 years but only now do i take it more serious with DSLR. I also have an A level in Digital imaging . My Friend is also a Proffesional Photographer of 8 years and he advised me to go with the K10D instead of a cannon. I asked about the K100 and he pretty much quoted the above comments and said better going with a semi pro model if your thinking of doing more serious work.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo