Noise and the K7

autumnlight
Posted 03/09/2011 - 13:33 Link
I find if i go anything above ISO 400 i get quite a bit of noise, i don't mind noise sometimes as i add it to a lot of my pics anyway, but when i don't want it and the light is bad and i have to up the ISO, noise is a problem, can anyone help me out because it most probably isn't the camera, i would think it is me being a bit of an air head.

Thank you Maria
alfpics
Posted 03/09/2011 - 13:50 - Helpful Comment Link
As per Gareth's answer above. I have the K7, but Lightroom 3 is very good at helping reduce noise from the RAW file
Andy
Andy
ChrisA
Posted 03/09/2011 - 13:52 - Helpful Comment Link
Noise also tends to be a lot worse when, as well as using high ISO, you additionally underexpose the image.

Inevitably, it's the featureless shadows that end up the most underexposed, and that's where the noise will be most obvious.

You might take a look at the histograms for some of the examples you're referring to, and see if you could have given them a bit more exposure.

Exposing to the right (and shooting RAW) will give you the best chance of minimising the noise at any ISO.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
autumnlight
Posted 03/09/2011 - 14:05 Link
Many thanks for all your help, i've never shot in RAW as i was unsure and a bit nervous to use it, but i think i'll start from today, thanks again for all the advise you've been a great help.
Pentaxophile
Posted 03/09/2011 - 14:16 - Helpful Comment Link
My K7 noise minimisation tips:
- Shoot RAW and use LR3
- Go for strong chroma noise reduction (the coloured specks), and go lighter on luminance noise (which looks more like a film-like grain).
- Make sure you do not underexpose, as readjusting the exposure in PP will make noise really bad! If possible, slightly overexpose and let your highlights clip ever so slightly (you may be able to recover them in Lightroom).
- You can use layers in Photoshop to apply hefty noise reduction to parts of the image while leaving other parts unaffected... where there is detail the noise is less visible and the detail is reduced by noise reduction, but solid areas like skies show noise quite obviously while being less adversely affected by strong noise reduction.
- Do not pixel peep too much! By the time you have resized your shot for the web or printed it, noise which was clearly visible at 1:1 will not (in many cases) be visible.
autumnlight
Posted 03/09/2011 - 14:28 Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
My K7 noise minimisation tips:
- Shoot RAW and use LR3
- Go for strong chroma noise reduction (the coloured specks), and go lighter on luminance noise (which looks more like a film-like grain).
- Make sure you do not underexpose, as readjusting the exposure in PP will make noise really bad! If possible, slightly overexpose and let your highlights clip ever so slightly (you may be able to recover them in Lightroom).
- You can use layers in Photoshop to apply hefty noise reduction to parts of the image while leaving other parts unaffected... where there is detail the noise is less visible and the detail is reduced by noise reduction, but solid areas like skies show noise quite obviously while being less adversely affected by strong noise reduction.
- Do not pixel peep too much! By the time you have resized your shot for the web or printed it, noise which was clearly visible at 1:1 will not (in many cases) be visible.
I'm really grateful that you've shared your tips with me, i do tend to underexpose slightly because i like the clarity it gives, but that is something i didn't know, thanks so much you've been a great help.
ChrisA
Posted 03/09/2011 - 15:57 - Helpful Comment Link
autumnlight wrote:
i do tend to underexpose slightly because i like the clarity it gives
There's no doubt that in an overexposed image, especially when it's so overexposed that the highlights have started to clip*, you'll lose detail, so it won't be as clear.

But you won't lose detail if you expose as much as possible to the right of the histogram, provided you don't start clipping the highlights.

It's better to reduce the exposure on the computer than in the camera, if what you want is a slightly less bright image that lets you see the detail in the bright bits (especially on some very bright monitors). This will give you more latitude to selectively bring up the shadow areas if you need to.
____

*if you don't know what clipping means, I'd *really* recommend reading something like this and also this.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
nass
Posted 03/09/2011 - 16:03 - Helpful Comment Link
What others said: avoid any underexposure on the K-7 above 800. If anything dial in a permanent bit over
... just another middle-aged guy with a hobby. I have an extreme macro learning site at extreme-macro.co.uk - Pentax-centric, your feedback and comments would be appreciated!
autumnlight
Posted 03/09/2011 - 22:33 Link
ChrisA wrote:
autumnlight wrote:
i do tend to underexpose slightly because i like the clarity it gives
There's no doubt that in an overexposed image, especially when it's so overexposed that the highlights have started to clip*, you'll lose detail, so it won't be as clear.

But you won't lose detail if you expose as much as possible to the right of the histogram, provided you don't start clipping the highlights.

It's better to reduce the exposure on the computer than in the camera, if what you want is a slightly less bright image that lets you see the detail in the bright bits (especially on some very bright monitors). This will give you more latitude to selectively bring up the shadow areas if you need to.
____

*if you don't know what clipping means, I'd *really* recommend reading something like this and also this.
nass wrote:
What others said: avoid any underexposure on the K-7 above 800. If anything dial in a permanent bit over
Thank you both, i do use the computer for all my editing and do use the histogram, i didn't know about clipping but will look it up, and i have no idea how to dial in a permanent bit over, there is always something new but you have been a great help, thanks again, what a great site this is.
alfpics
Posted 03/09/2011 - 23:16 - Helpful Comment Link
Quote:
and i have no idea how to dial in a permanent bit over
Basically it means to set the exposure compensation permanently to say 1/3 or 1/2 or maybe 2/3 above the normal metered exposure. I don't know which mode you usually use the K-7 in, but the +/- button allows you set exposure compensation which remains at what you set it to.
Andy
Andy
autumnlight
Posted 04/09/2011 - 13:00 Link
Oh thanks for that Andy, i've never been in to the camera to set anything because i was worried i wouldn'tget back to factory settings, i mainly use manual mode and manual focus, i think i need to study the camera manual more.
Maria
dinneenp
Posted 06/09/2011 - 15:46 - Helpful Comment Link
I had the K-X which was great for high ISO levels.
I read about the K-7 before upgrading and was aware of it. It is a negative, I do use the exposure compensation.
Besides that I really like the camera, I was thinking beforehand how handy would the top lcd screen be. But I love it and always glance at that now. Also the extra buttons on the top are extremelly handy and allow very quick access.
and the other extra features (images on rear screenmoves if I rotate camera 180%) make it great.
Cheers,
Pa
http://www.photoblog.ie where every post have a musical reference as it's title.
autumnlight
Posted 16/09/2011 - 22:58 Link
dinneenp wrote:
I had the K-X which was great for high ISO levels.
I read about the K-7 before upgrading and was aware of it. It is a negative, I do use the exposure compensation.
Besides that I really like the camera, I was thinking beforehand how handy would the top lcd screen be. But I love it and always glance at that now. Also the extra buttons on the top are extremelly handy and allow very quick access.
and the other extra features (images on rear screenmoves if I rotate camera 180%) make it great.
Thank you i've only just seen your post, and i agree the buttons on the top are a good feature.
davidstorm
Posted 16/09/2011 - 23:44 - Helpful Comment Link
I don't think you should worry too much about noise Maria given the results you are obtaining with your pics. I haven't noticed it being obtrusive in any of them and if anything it adds to the atmosphere.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
sam-joseph
Posted 17/09/2011 - 05:45 - Helpful Comment Link
Someone on the other Pentax forum suggests setting the High-ISO Noise Reduction (Custom menu 3, option 19) to 3 (High), as well as High-ISO Noise Reduction Starting Sensitivity Level(option 20) to 3 (ISO400). This is apparently very effective for those of us shooting jpegs.

Regards
Sam-Joseph
Pentax K7, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX, Sigma 70-300 APO, Sigma 1.4x TC, Vivitar 2x TC. Takumar 135mm f2.5, SMC Pentax A 50mm 1:1.7, SMC Pentax -M 1:4 200mm, Pentax X70

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo