My three Exes

womble
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:02 Link
No, not girlfriends!

For a bit of fun I took some shots of my three X's, the KX, LX and MX.

1. The trio of Xs

Comment Image


2. The KX with SMC 35mm f/3.5 lens

Comment Image


3. The LX with SMC 50mm f/1.2, grip B and FA-1W viewfinder.
Comment Image


4. The MX with SMC-M 40mm f/2.8 pancake lens.

Comment Image


5. The LX with the same lens but with the LX power winder and an AF280T flashgun.
Comment Image


6. The MX with an MX power winder and a SMC-M 100mm f/2.8 lens.
Comment Image


Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
bwlchmawr
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:26 Link
That's a lovely collection, Kris. Aren't they in excellent condition? Had any of them from new?

Regards,

Andrew
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
womble
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:29 Link
No, all second hand. I have only bought two new SLRs: my original ME Super in 1982, and my K10D in 2007. The LX and MX were bought in 2005, the KX about three weeks ago.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
thoughton
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:34 Link
Lovely collection Kris

Now for the critique: is that purple fringing I see in the first MX shot?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 18/03/2010 - 12:34
bwlchmawr
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:34 Link
Then that makes their condition all the more remarkable.

A.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
womble
Posted 18/03/2010 - 12:53 Link
thoughton wrote:
Lovely collection Kris

Now for the critique: is that purple fringing I see in the first MX shot?
That is the setting sun glinting off the metalwork. Well, that is my story and I am sticking to it

That'll teach me to use the Tammy...
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
thoughton
Posted 18/03/2010 - 13:08 Link
Another thing that comes to mind is the gold 'Approved' sticker on the MX. Every time I buy an old lens, it has one of these stickers on it. What was wrong with people in the 70s? Didn't they ever feel the urge to remove the blasted things? 30 years later they are hard to get off!!!
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Dangermouse
Posted 18/03/2010 - 13:36 Link
I tend to see it as a good sign if the "approved" sticker is still there - evidently the item has had a pretty easy life if a paper label is still intact and legible!

Still keeping an eye out for a sub-£70 40mm pancake for my MX, people seem to have the idea that they're rare and should go for £100+...
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
thoughton
Posted 18/03/2010 - 13:43 Link
Yes, definitely noticed that!

Speaking of extortionate ebayers, I noticed today that EmiliaArts has re-listed that mutilated Pentax-A 50mm f1.2 today. Still at £499 I sent them a ranting email about it!
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 18/03/2010 - 13:43
Hyram
Posted 18/03/2010 - 13:54 Link
womble wrote:
......................the KX about three weeks ago.

K.
So pay day finally arrived
Hyram

Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
hefty1
Posted 18/03/2010 - 14:11 Link
So the question is; if you could only keep one of the three which would it be and why?
Joining the Q
fatspider
Posted 18/03/2010 - 14:25 Link
Quote:
So the question is; if you could only keep one of the three which would it be and why
Have you ever written questions for Blind Date Hefty?

PS nice hat trick Kris

edit; typo
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
Edited by fatspider: 18/03/2010 - 14:25
womble
Posted 18/03/2010 - 15:58 Link
hefty1 wrote:
So the question is; if you could only keep one of the three which would it be and why?
Easy. The LX. The most accurate lightmeter of any camera I have ever used, interchangeable viewfinders, built like a tank except for the ASA/exposure compensation dial biut not huge and bulky, sensible metering system in the viewfinder... In fact, if I could (heaven forbid) only keep one 35mm film camera of the 20-odd I have, it would be the LX. Oddly, despite all its limitations, I would be very sad to see my ES go. Quirky camera, but solid and reliable, and I have been impressed by how good it's auto-exposure is given its vintage.

Gareth... yes the 100mm is a tiny little thing. I was inspired to get one by John R. who sung its praises. I got the correct clip-on lens hood for it today.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
womble
Posted 18/03/2010 - 16:52 Link
A few of the LX and associated bits and bobs. Note the Pentax table-top tripod!

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Yes, I know, I am, a nerd. And proud of it!

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
hefty1
Posted 18/03/2010 - 17:57 Link
impotentspider wrote:
Have you ever written questions for Blind Date Hefty?
My cover has been blown!

I'm still undecided about keeping my new LX or not (I was giving up 35mm for New Year and just sticking to digital and MF supposedly), but if I do then I'm going to want one of those FF-1 finders for it. How much do you want for yours Kris?
Joining the Q

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo