My first few with the FA77 ltd
Great pictures of the children. Nuff said.
Steve
Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?

PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released

Like them is number 9 a little cooler in the white balance?
Possibly. To my eyes on my monitor it looks quite similar to #8, but maybe that's because I know it was taken under identical light. It's also hard to get an accurate impression on my monitor because it's failing (top half is significantly dimmer than the bottom half - quite good ND grad effect for viewing landscapes, but otherwise a complete PITA).
Looking back at my processing settings in Lightroom, I processed both #8 and #9 as daylight (5,500K). However I agree that might not quite be right - the light falling on the scene came from a blue sky (the sun was on the other side of the house). You can see this in the catchlight in the eyes (along with my arm):

Thanks for the comments.
EM
You can see some of my photos here if you are so inclined
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Regards
David
Flickr
Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu
Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
However, to my relief, these are exceptions.
5 - 8 are nice, but as you've hinted, the expressions are fairly blank, so it's difficult to engage without the context you have, knowing them already. I like 9 very much, the eyes are really compelling.
I'd pick out 4 and 10 as particularly excellent, since they have an intensity of expression that's absent in the others.
I'd lose the cheesy captions though. The pictures stand on their own merit IMO.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Perhaps 10 could be brightened a touch, and I'd be interested to see the colour versions of them.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
A wonderful, natural set of images, nothing fancy or over processed here, just precious moments captured so well.
Regards
David
I agree. A wonderful set. Nice compositions, nice vibe.
#4 and #10 are superb and if you don't print them out, mount them in nice frames and hang them on your wall I'm going to ring up social services and report you for child neglect

[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
The only thing better than the lens are your lovely kids.
You wouldn't write that if you could have seen what they were doing last night

Normally I cringe when people post pictures of their kids, since it's impossible to tell them the truth, so I normally don't bother.
However, to my relief, these are exceptions.
Thank you. I know how you feel. As the vast majority of my pictures are of my children, this is one of the main reasons why I rarely share them (the other reasons are extended periods of taking no photos at all and being very critical of my own work).
I posted them here for feedback on how they stand as images to people who don't know the children in the images. Of course, the images have a different value to me and my family which makes it even harder for me to be truly critical of my own work.
I'd be interested to see the colour versions of them.
No problem. With cheese-free captions this time

#4: In colour without the crop (note distracting background, particularly top-right and bottom-left)

#10: In colour

#4 and #10 are superb and if you don't print them out, mount them in nice frames and hang them on your wall I'm going to ring up social services and report you for child neglect


Thanks again to all,
EM
Not bothered about the background - it balances nicely with the also OOF green top, and the eyes are so compelling that the distraction is negligible. A very good use of depth of field, in fact.
I still think a bit of work on the exposure in the one of the three of them would make it even better. Getting expressions as good as that from three kids simultaneously is really hard, and you've done a marvellous job there.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
it does look a cracking lens does that
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Epithet Man
Member
Cambridge
#1 Laughing her head off
#2 Reaching up
#3 Sucking that thumb again
#4 Hooray, those glasses aren't in the way for once
#5 A blank look
#6 Staring into space
#7 When is he going to stop pointing that camera at me?
#8 Posing again
#9 More posing
#10 The gang
#11 Yum!
Comments and criticisms welcomed. Apologies for posting loads of pictures of my children, but I bought this lens for taking portraits of them.
Thanks for looking,
EM