Macro lens for my K10D
Posted 26/12/2009 - 20:15 - Helpful Comment
Link
Well thats funny as i just bought a macro lens with some of the money from selling you the K10D
I bought the Tamron 90mm macro adaptall and there are a couple on ebay at the monent - you should get a decent Tamron f2.5 with the required extension tube to make it 1.1 for around £90 or the later f2.8 version for around the same price - here are a couple on ebay
link
link
I bought the Tamron 90mm macro adaptall and there are a couple on ebay at the monent - you should get a decent Tamron f2.5 with the required extension tube to make it 1.1 for around £90 or the later f2.8 version for around the same price - here are a couple on ebay
link
link
K7D DA 18-55 mk11WR|50-200 wr|DA16-45|Tamron SP90|lots of manual pentax glass
Posted 26/12/2009 - 23:56 - Helpful Comment
Link
A Tamron SP 2,5/90 (Adaptall), with an PKA-Adapter, is the lens what I use most frecuently. You can see lots of photos with it at this site:
link
It's an excelent lens. The limit of scale to 1:2 is a bit limiting, but no too much, as there are remedies. To get bigger scale easyest is to use a Teleconverter: you maintain ability to focus to larger distances; I almost all the time use this lens with an Tamron TC 1,4 (Adaptall), so I have an 3,7/120, a very useful focal length for insects. Maximum scale with this TC is about 0,7, enougph for most situations. For big scale, the specific 45mm extensions (it is possible to use more then one, and you can combine with TCs). All these TCs and extension rings go between the lens and the PKA - mount. That's a very flexible system.
The PKA adapter is a bit difficult to get these days. I got two of them in a regular local shop: there were some left at a distributer. Using it with the more common PK or PK-M adapter (same thing) is less comfortable and limiting, as the P-TTL flash control won't work, and metering will be less precise and easy.
The more recent 2.8/90 (specific PKA mount; non Adaptall) won't need specific adapters nor complements to get scale 1:1, but it might be somewhat more expensive. This lens will reduce focal lenght at bigger scales (as all modern macro lenses), the 2,5/90 doesn't.
Regards - Klaus
link
It's an excelent lens. The limit of scale to 1:2 is a bit limiting, but no too much, as there are remedies. To get bigger scale easyest is to use a Teleconverter: you maintain ability to focus to larger distances; I almost all the time use this lens with an Tamron TC 1,4 (Adaptall), so I have an 3,7/120, a very useful focal length for insects. Maximum scale with this TC is about 0,7, enougph for most situations. For big scale, the specific 45mm extensions (it is possible to use more then one, and you can combine with TCs). All these TCs and extension rings go between the lens and the PKA - mount. That's a very flexible system.
The PKA adapter is a bit difficult to get these days. I got two of them in a regular local shop: there were some left at a distributer. Using it with the more common PK or PK-M adapter (same thing) is less comfortable and limiting, as the P-TTL flash control won't work, and metering will be less precise and easy.
The more recent 2.8/90 (specific PKA mount; non Adaptall) won't need specific adapters nor complements to get scale 1:1, but it might be somewhat more expensive. This lens will reduce focal lenght at bigger scales (as all modern macro lenses), the 2,5/90 doesn't.
Regards - Klaus
K10D, Ricoh XRX
Tamron SP 90/2,5, TC SP 1,4x, TC SP 2x, 5 extension rings of 45mm, SP 300/5,6.
Pentax DA*300/4, A 28/2,8, M 50/1,7, DA 18-55/4-5,6
2 flashes 360 FGZ, Soligor ring flash…
Tamron SP 90/2,5, TC SP 1,4x, TC SP 2x, 5 extension rings of 45mm, SP 300/5,6.
Pentax DA*300/4, A 28/2,8, M 50/1,7, DA 18-55/4-5,6
2 flashes 360 FGZ, Soligor ring flash…
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


49 posts
16 years
Merseyside.
Like most people I don't bathe in money so my budget hovers as close to £100 as I can get it. I don't mind if its an old lens or 2nd hand. Of course I'd prefer it to be able to produce 1:1 images but that's not essential.
Basically, like a lot of people I want as much as I can get for the smallest amount of money. You don't have to recommend a lens as such, any help or advice (apart from "increase your budget by £1000") would be very much appreciated as I am a little out of my depth.
Thanks in advance,
Phil.