Lens shake?
What is it we are actually looking at?
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
It might help to know what your aperture setting is and as Nigel has suggested, the crop magnifications. Also agree with John; what are we looking at? I guess we will also need to know weather conditions, firmness of ground, and robustness of stand.
For what its worth, I sometimes have problems with the same lens - most likely back focusing, but it doesn't look like lack of focus.
Ronnie
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
It is a rock formation on the beach

Taken handheld, bright sun.
I've noticed it a couple of times recently in high contrast shots, normally the lens focusses fine.
It was taken in raw format with no in-camera corrections or adjustments.
The above are reduced jpegs straight from the original raw files
It seems the other two shots (at different focal lengths but same aperture) also have it but not so defined
Michael
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
any filter on? They don't like'em.
Many thanks for that
Michael
Looking at your second image, the aberration is perpendicular to any edge. That's not shake of any kind.
First thing I'd do would be to have a look at the RAW file with RawDigger or similar to eliminate any possible processing artefacts.
... First thing I'd do would be to have a look at the RAW file with RawDigger or similar to eliminate any possible processing artefacts.
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Need to put it on a tripod, mirror up, and either self timer or remote
Can't rule out technique until you do that
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1293 posts
16 years
Shropshire
These were taken with K5 and 55-300 DA lens
I noticed this blur which looks like camera shake but they were taken at 1600th and 800th, I thought maybe i'd left the shake reduction on but no, i checked that. I took 3 images within minutes of each other but the blur seems worse on the third one, the 150mm @800th
These are heavy crops from the edge to show the effect
120mm@1600th
150mm@800th
...and here is another shot cropped from the centre
Any help would be appreciated
Michael