Kerry On Holiday
Posted 19/07/2009 - 15:12
Link
I think you should upload the original colour one.
That way some of us can show you different examples of desaturation modes.
Because....I think the one used by you, isn't the best one. They both have a muddy, non sparkling low contrast appearance.
About the girls pose: I think she could be a bit more relaxed.
Now she is holding on very tight, as if she is afraid to fall of......
Martin.
edit: typo
That way some of us can show you different examples of desaturation modes.
Because....I think the one used by you, isn't the best one. They both have a muddy, non sparkling low contrast appearance.
About the girls pose: I think she could be a bit more relaxed.
Now she is holding on very tight, as if she is afraid to fall of......
Martin.
edit: typo
Posted 19/07/2009 - 15:24
Link
Ok Martin Here is the original color photo's.
I havent editied these I have just pulled theme straight off the RAW.
I just used the desaturation in PS i didnt know there was different ones
As for the pose I dont know lol
Thanks Martin.
I havent editied these I have just pulled theme straight off the RAW.
I just used the desaturation in PS i didnt know there was different ones
As for the pose I dont know lol
Thanks Martin.
Lil Andy
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
Posted 19/07/2009 - 15:27
Link
Lil Andy
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
Posted 19/07/2009 - 15:32
Link
Ok, I will have a go with it, later this day.
Martin.
Martin.
Posted 19/07/2009 - 15:35
Link
Thanks Martin. As usual you are a star
Lil Andy
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
Posted 19/07/2009 - 16:54
Link
OK Andy,
This is what I have done to them.
I opened them in L.R. and used auto exposure. Than added some contrast by using a slight S curve in levels. Fore the mono conversion I used grey scale in the Colour tab. This gives you the best instrument to work on individual colours. (This tool is also found in ACR for PS CS 3 and higher.
Finally I split toned the images by cooling down the shadows and warming up the highlights. Oh.......and I took some creative liberty to crop and clone out some distracting elements.
Note: There are some compression artefacts caused by importing and exporting a very small file.
and
Oh...BTW, your Copyright is fully protected and mentioned on my website,
as done to all the edits I do for others to show the examples here.
Please look here.
Martin.
This is what I have done to them.
I opened them in L.R. and used auto exposure. Than added some contrast by using a slight S curve in levels. Fore the mono conversion I used grey scale in the Colour tab. This gives you the best instrument to work on individual colours. (This tool is also found in ACR for PS CS 3 and higher.
Finally I split toned the images by cooling down the shadows and warming up the highlights. Oh.......and I took some creative liberty to crop and clone out some distracting elements.
Note: There are some compression artefacts caused by importing and exporting a very small file.
and
Oh...BTW, your Copyright is fully protected and mentioned on my website,
as done to all the edits I do for others to show the examples here.
Please look here.
Martin.
Posted 19/07/2009 - 17:07
Link
To be honest (and not insulting here)but i think that is a terrible edit.
May i have a go as i am confident i can make it look much better than the original?
Matt
May i have a go as i am confident i can make it look much better than the original?
Matt
Posted 19/07/2009 - 17:38
Link
Thanks Martin, And Yes Matt of course it is ok. Ime open to all suggestions!
Lil Andy
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
Posted 19/07/2009 - 18:44
Link
Cloudhunter wrote:
To be honest (and not insulting here)but i think that is a terrible edit.
May i have a go as i am confident i can make it look much better than the original?
Matt
To be honest (and not insulting here)but i think that is a terrible edit.
May i have a go as i am confident i can make it look much better than the original?
Matt
No worries, it takes a bit more to insult me. I'm confident you will do a much better job at it. I know I don't know diddly **** about model photography and the lighting involved. I was only showing an other way in which the B&W conversion could be achieved. Compared to the muddy and lifeless posted versions by the OP.
So...by all means, show us how it's done.
Posted 19/07/2009 - 18:55
Link
Hi,
Just done the first one. Did a slight curves adjustment, used the magic wand to isolate the girl, increased exposure by 0.6 and then sharpened the lot by 50%.
Does suffer from slight fuzziness due to the compression of the jpeg and if was a raw file you wouldnt see the black line around her. (was there anyway just shows up more due to upping the exposure slightly)
If i had the original it would be alot better.
Matt
Just done the first one. Did a slight curves adjustment, used the magic wand to isolate the girl, increased exposure by 0.6 and then sharpened the lot by 50%.
Does suffer from slight fuzziness due to the compression of the jpeg and if was a raw file you wouldnt see the black line around her. (was there anyway just shows up more due to upping the exposure slightly)
If i had the original it would be alot better.
Matt
Posted 20/07/2009 - 09:08
Link
Cloudhunter wrote:
Hi,
Just done the first one. Did a slight curves adjustment, used the magic wand to isolate the girl, increased exposure by 0.6 and then sharpened the lot by 50%.
Does suffer from slight fuzziness due to the compression of the jpeg and if was a raw file you wouldnt see the black line around her. (was there anyway just shows up more due to upping the exposure slightly)
If i had the original it would be alot better.
Matt
Hi,
Just done the first one. Did a slight curves adjustment, used the magic wand to isolate the girl, increased exposure by 0.6 and then sharpened the lot by 50%.
Does suffer from slight fuzziness due to the compression of the jpeg and if was a raw file you wouldnt see the black line around her. (was there anyway just shows up more due to upping the exposure slightly)
If i had the original it would be alot better.
Matt
Matt,
Dont get me wrong but I think this version of the image is definitely bad. You just have to look at the tone of the subject's skin particularly her face as the profile has been captured and it just shows those really bad patches, only difference is in the coloured image is reddish and in yours its darkened. Not a nice image at all and the black line around her left leg really is out of control.
Martin's version looks much more controlled and nicer to the eye. Of course this considering the fact that the original one is not exactly a very high quality anyway but a good transformation still under the circumstances.
Just my personal humble opinion anyway so feel free to repudiate it
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 20/07/2009 - 11:38
Link
Well, lets not turn this into a: Mine is bigger than yours kind of thing.
Important is the OP knows there are other ways to do a mono conversion.
Matt obviously knew he could do a better job. Which is fine by me.
Seasoning to taste, Right??
Martin.
Important is the OP knows there are other ways to do a mono conversion.
Matt obviously knew he could do a better job. Which is fine by me.
Seasoning to taste, Right??
Martin.
Posted 20/07/2009 - 16:17
Link
Thanks Both. Well theres certainly 3 very different ways of doing the same thing.
IMO I think martin has the skin tones beter but I do prefer Matt's Colors overall.
Oh well like Martin has said seasoning to taste!
Thanks for all your input guys. I think ile try to stick more to wildlife and landscape though LOL
IMO I think martin has the skin tones beter but I do prefer Matt's Colors overall.
Oh well like Martin has said seasoning to taste!
Thanks for all your input guys. I think ile try to stick more to wildlife and landscape though LOL
Lil Andy
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk
Posted 20/07/2009 - 16:23
Link
Numerous ways to do it and if we had the original raw to play with it the blemishes on the skin wouldnt be there. its only there due to compression.
Matt
Matt
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
319 posts
15 years
Telford
Ime sure most of you know portraiture is something Ime rubbish at but I was looking for opinions on these.
Ive desaturated them both because 1 I thought they looked nicer and 2 despite useing the flash in the dark her face was still very red!
C+C Appreciated
K20D, PENTAX DA 18-55, TAMRON DI 70-300, PENTAX SMC-K 135 f2.5
www.ajohnson-photography.co.uk