K5II - centre focus point - AF at f2.8 - What?
Posted 27/04/2013 - 09:48
Link
If the K-5II does contain f/2.8 high-precision AF points
it should have been picked up by the reviews It is
after all a major improvement.... maybe the trap in focus
will work more accurately now I've not read them
so I don't know.
My 96 year old Aunt has been asking Pentax for this for years!
She will be pleased
'
it should have been picked up by the reviews It is
after all a major improvement.... maybe the trap in focus
will work more accurately now I've not read them
so I don't know.
My 96 year old Aunt has been asking Pentax for this for years!
She will be pleased
'
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 27/04/2013 - 10:03
Link
andrewk wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="JohnX"]I guess folks can look up the corresponding figures in their K5 and K5II manuals.
Out of curiosity, I did.[quote:3496ace15f="JohnX"]I guess folks can look up the corresponding figures in their K5 and K5II manuals.
The K-5 is EV-1 to 18, the K-5 II is EV-3 to 18, but I can find no reference to aperture that this refers to.
All I know is that the K-5 II is awesome at focusing in very low light with a f2.8 lens.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 27/04/2013 - 13:50
Link
Algernon wrote:
it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
In a similar vein, I read that the sensor in the K5II is not the same as that in the K5, it having been redesigned - something to do with the size of the photo-sites? Only saw this once.
it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
Posted 27/04/2013 - 16:14
Link
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/digital-slr/K5-II.html
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 28/04/2013 - 10:14
Link
Mannesty wrote:
All I know is that the K-5 II is awesome at focusing in very low light with a f2.8 lens.
did first wedding yesterday since moving to Pentax, K5II + 50-135 2.8 exceeded all expectations at the reception, focusing quick and spot on made me really chuffed I switched systems
All I know is that the K-5 II is awesome at focusing in very low light with a f2.8 lens.
Posted 28/04/2013 - 20:58
Link
JohnX wrote:
Where did you read this?
Algernon wrote:
it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
In a similar vein, I read that the sensor in the K5II is not the same as that in the K5, it having been redesigned - something to do with the size of the photo-sites? Only saw this once.it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 28/04/2013 - 22:09
Link
Smeggypants wrote:
JohnX wrote:
Where did you read this?Algernon wrote:
it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
In a similar vein, I read that the sensor in the K5II is not the same as that in the K5, it having been redesigned - something to do with the size of the photo-sites? Only saw this once.it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
Algernon wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/digital-slr/K5-II.html
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/digital-slr/K5-II.html
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Posted 28/04/2013 - 22:10
Link
I have done extensive testing with the da 50mm 1.8 and the F 50 mm 1.4 and at wide open apertures the mkii is nearly always spot on with focus...
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Posted 28/04/2013 - 22:18
Link
Smeggypants wrote:
Wish I could remember! It was in an on-line piece before the K5II launch.
JohnX wrote:
Where did you read this?Algernon wrote:
it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
In a similar vein, I read that the sensor in the K5II is not the same as that in the K5, it having been redesigned - something to do with the size of the photo-sites? Only saw this once.it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
Posted 28/04/2013 - 23:15
Link
cabstar wrote:
Smeggypants wrote:
Where did you read this?JohnX wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="Algernon"]it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
In a similar vein, I read that the sensor in the K5II is not the same as that in the K5, it having been redesigned - something to do with the size of the photo-sites? Only saw this once.[quote:3496ace15f="Algernon"]it should have been picked up by the reviews
'
Algernon wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/digital-slr/K5-II.html
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
[/quote]Sorry, I think I was thinking of the image sensor rather than the AF sensor. Whoops
http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/digital-slr/K5-II.html
It actually states on the Pentax K5-II site......
SAFOX X can work with luminous flux based on F2.8 levels in addition to that of F5.6.
This increase the AF accuracy drastically when using with very fast lenses.
Strange that no one seems to have tested this accuracy with a lens of less than f/2.8 ...... say FA 50mm f/1.4 .... It's the 1st thing I would have tried if I had a Mk, II
The K-5 AF doesn't impress me it's probably within the DOF, but no better.
'
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 28/04/2013 - 23:43
Link
Shot a wedding today with Shaun Wilson and used the K-5iis and K-5 mk1. Used only two lenses, Sigma 105mm DG EX Macro and DA 17-70. The two lenses were interchanged between the cameras.
In a nutshell, the K-5iis blew the K-5 completely out of the water, mainly due to the sublime focussing accuracy. It is a demon in low light and nails accurate focus almost 100% of the time. In a wedding shoot situation, this is gold dust. By comparison, the K-5 was hit and miss at best and missed focus 50% of the time.
I will be buying another K-5iis as soon as the price comes down and will be trying (again) to re-calibrate the K-5.
Regards
David
In a nutshell, the K-5iis blew the K-5 completely out of the water, mainly due to the sublime focussing accuracy. It is a demon in low light and nails accurate focus almost 100% of the time. In a wedding shoot situation, this is gold dust. By comparison, the K-5 was hit and miss at best and missed focus 50% of the time.
I will be buying another K-5iis as soon as the price comes down and will be trying (again) to re-calibrate the K-5.
Regards
David
Posted 29/04/2013 - 02:01
Link
I shot a gig last night and left my k-5 mki at hone exactly because of the lack of focus accuracy. First gig I shot with one body in over 5 years.
I wish the extra £100 trade in was on at srs as my order for a second mkii would be in..
I wish the extra £100 trade in was on at srs as my order for a second mkii would be in..
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Posted 29/04/2013 - 03:36
Link
I wish I could justify trading my two K-5's up for a couple of K-5II's.
I shall be holding out for the next model
I shall be holding out for the next model
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


828 posts
17 years
Oldham,
Lancashire,UK
I saw a post elsewhere that commented on how the centre focus point of the K5II will work at f2.8, (in the horizontal plane), and that this was an improvement on the K5 et al
I also have a K200D and the specification says that the autofocus operating range is EV -1 to 18 at ISO 100, using a f/1.4 lens. The K30 autofocus system is, therefore, two full stops more sensitive than that of the K200D (again, assuming that f/2.8 is the relevant aperture). I guess folks can look up the corresponding figures in their K5 and K5II manuals.
I can only guess at what the reference to Canikon cameras focussing at f/8 means. Presumably a bit of Googling would reveal the autofocus operating range for non-Pentax cameras (or download the operating manual for a Canikon camera and look it up)
Andrew