K-7 and lens correction ?
Posted 19/08/2009 - 23:49
Link
It is actually pretty good. The downside is that it takes quite a bit longer to "save" a picture. When doing sports and shooting in burst, it can make you miss pictures you would have gotten if the function had been turned off.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 20/08/2009 - 05:51
Link
I had it switched on for a couple days after I got the camera but for the same reason as Yves, I turned it off. It took an age to save a shot.
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Posted 20/08/2009 - 08:29
Link
It would probably be useful for specific shots - perhaps an occasional architectural subject with a lens that exhibited a degree of barrel distortion at wide angles.
Best regards, John
Posted 20/08/2009 - 11:11
Link
johnriley wrote:
It would probably be useful for specific shots - perhaps an occasional architectural subject with a lens that exhibited a degree of barrel distortion at wide angles.
But for something like that, would you really want to fix it in the camera rather than the computer?
It would probably be useful for specific shots - perhaps an occasional architectural subject with a lens that exhibited a degree of barrel distortion at wide angles.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 20/08/2009 - 13:53
Link
It depends how good a job the camera makes of it. In theory no, I wouldn't, but continuing advances in digital imaging keep throwing old theories away....I'd like to try it at least.
Best regards, John
Posted 20/08/2009 - 17:58
Link
I have a Panasonic LX3 compact with the Leica 5.1mm (24mm equiv) f2 lens. Even in RAW, software lens corrections are applied. The software corrections seem to be a part of the lens spec, as it were.
Leitz say that modern technology is such that the application of software to (obviously) optical correction make this lens possible where optically it would not be.
It's a matter of opinion whether this is a good thing or not but judged on results it works wonderfully well.
Leitz say that modern technology is such that the application of software to (obviously) optical correction make this lens possible where optically it would not be.
It's a matter of opinion whether this is a good thing or not but judged on results it works wonderfully well.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


271 posts
20 years
Stockholm
"Automatic compensation of distortion and lateral chromatic aberration (available only with DA- and DFA-series lenses)" as its says in the press release.
Does it make a noticeable difference ? On paper it looks like a useful feature, but I have not seen anyone mention it on the forum yet.
Cheers,
/Ian