K-3 sample images
Posted 08/10/2013 - 17:18
Link
Some of those were taken in early August ...
Posted 08/10/2013 - 17:19
Link
Why do samples never show a new product off very well
Can't say I am very impressed with the first one and gave up after that due to the download time
Can't say I am very impressed with the first one and gave up after that due to the download time
Posted 08/10/2013 - 17:21
Link
two things jump out at me
1: nothing taken above ISO 200
2: on a camera which has a shiney new metering module which is one of its flagship features, all but one of them has a significant exposure compensation applied.
As always it's hard to tell anything much from sample images, looking forward to some reviews and user experiences!
1: nothing taken above ISO 200
2: on a camera which has a shiney new metering module which is one of its flagship features, all but one of them has a significant exposure compensation applied.
As always it's hard to tell anything much from sample images, looking forward to some reviews and user experiences!
you don't have to be mad to post here
but it does help
but it does help
Posted 08/10/2013 - 17:52
Link
The 1st one's 13343KB I wonder how big the RAW is?
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 08/10/2013 - 18:00
Link
Please don't find TOO many faults, mine is already pre-ordered!
K-1, Sigma 12-24mm DG EX, Sigma 24-70mm DG EX, K-3, White K-01 with 40mm XS and white 35mm f2.4, SMC Pentax FA 1.8 31mm AL Limited, 43mm f1.9 Limited, 77mm f1.8 Limited, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, SMC Pentax DA* 50-135 f2.8, MX + SMC M 50mm f1.4, SMC A 50mm f1.4, SMC A 50mm f1.2, Spotmatic F 55mm f1.8, ES with 55mm f1.8 and 28mm f3.5, Program Plus (Chrome) with SMC A 50mm f1.7, Pentax 6x7, Leica ii, plus misc. odds and sods)
Posted 08/10/2013 - 18:48
Link
Very expensive considering the similar competition. Needs to be around the £800 mark.
Posted 08/10/2013 - 18:48
Link
Algernon wrote:
The 1st one's 13343KB I wonder how big the RAW is?
I've had RAWs over 30Mb at higher ISOs with the K-5 Expect them to get to 45MB
The 1st one's 13343KB I wonder how big the RAW is?
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 08/10/2013 - 19:02
Link
leytono wrote:
Why do samples never show a new product off very well
Can't say I am very impressed with the first one and gave up after that due to the download time
I don't know why but the Pentax servers seem to limit the download speed on any file be it the test images, PDFs of manuals, updates &c. I was watching a manual download and it was running at around 500kbps.
Why do samples never show a new product off very well
Can't say I am very impressed with the first one and gave up after that due to the download time
Posted 08/10/2013 - 19:18
Link
Mongoose wrote:
...on a camera which has a shiny new metering module which is one of its flagship features, all but one of them has a significant exposure compensation applied.
Surely that is the photographer taking creative control of the output of the camera? If the K-3 knew what he was trying to produce, that would be really amazing technology....on a camera which has a shiny new metering module which is one of its flagship features, all but one of them has a significant exposure compensation applied.
Philip
Posted 08/10/2013 - 20:32
Link
Interesting examples. I have quite similar examples to the first and fifth shots. With the first the image quality is pretty much up to what I would expect to achieve with the K5 and my favourite lenses around that focal length, although I don't have a 16-50 to judge it against. The fifth struck me as more interesting. The detail on the beak is again pretty much I get from the K5 and DA300. Here are comparable crops from the background. The K3 is a camera processed JPEG and the K5 is raw through Lightroom with sharpening of 25 and no noise reduction:
Obviously completely unscientific and the only proper way to judge is by all things being equal. However I have drawn my own initial conclusions.
Obviously completely unscientific and the only proper way to judge is by all things being equal. However I have drawn my own initial conclusions.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
7671 posts
16 years
Smegland
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283