iPad or other tablet for viewing and storage

LennyBloke
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:11 Link
I think giofi has hit the nail on the head...

...the iPay devices are designed to be simple to use! But if you are willing to do a bit of research and try a few tablets you can probably find something much cheaper and equally as suitable.

It does come down to personal preferences, the screen is clearly important to you as is the ability to connect a storage device, these were the 2 things I wanted so I ended up with a Nook HD, it was originally designed as an E-reader (I believe) but to me the high quality screen looks better than most other tablets and pretty much on a par with the iPays. I use a Micro SD card to view photos (great when you're away and want to see your shots in decent resolution quite quickly) - but to be honest I would like to be able to connect an external hard drive (not sure how many devices this is possible with).

Hope my experiences help a little.
LennyBloke
Gamka
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:15 Link
MattyH wrote:


Yes it costs a bit more then the others, but so does the Pentax 16-50mm compared to the Pentax 18-55mm....... Both do the same job, one is a lot more pricey then the other, but which would you rather use???


Not an appropriate comparison. However, if Apple decided to sell DSLRs and then offered a "super high quality 16-50mm f2.8 lens" for £1800 there are people who would but it because it has an "Apple Logo" whereas all it would be is a rebadged Pentax available for £900.
RussV
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:27 Link
pentaxian450 wrote:
giofi wrote:
Hi, can you please elaborate? Why are you better off with an android tablet?
When you get an Apple device, you have to deal with Apple for just about everything. Apple is not an open system like Android. Whenever you get a new app, you give some money to Apple. There isn't a more monopolistic company than Apple.

Android opens it's arms to third party, while Apple shuns them.

If you have an Android device, you can dowload the "Rawdroid" app. It reads just about any RAW files you can find.
Agreed, Apple try and lock their users in. I think their hardware is over priced. The price differences for more memory are ridiculous considering it costs peanuts.
K10D
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:30 Link
As a last minute Xmas present, I bought my wife an iPad air 128Gb. I bought the max ram version purely for storing her best images.

She shoots her pictures on a Pentax Q and will use the iPad for several things; viewing her best images, Skype, email and maybe even take a few shots with it. Buying a Apple product does not mean continued payments to Apple.

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 30/12/2013 - 09:46
Smeggypants
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:42 Link
MattyH wrote:
Smeggypants wrote:
johnriley wrote:
Apple have been able to make their products desirable. If a manufacturer can do that they will be successful.

Some camera manufacturers have been doing that for years, decades even.
Yes you can say Leica
But they were desirable nearly 100 years ago before marketing and the internet, so that doesn't count
Marketing didn't start with the internet. It has been going on on well before Leica ever existed.



.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Smeggypants
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:48 Link
MattyH wrote:


The iPad IS the best tablet on the market bar none, it has the best screen by a mile, the fastest processor, the best operating system and the number one plus point for me and my family is that it is just so easy to use right out of the box,
Propaganda wthh no basis in objective scrutiny

Quote:

Yes it costs a bit more then the others, but so does the Pentax 16-50mm compared to the Pentax 18-55mm....... Both do the same job, one is a lot more pricey then the other, but which would you rather use???
No they don't do the same job. The DA* 16-50mm gives results that are much higher quality than the Pentax 18-55mm kit lens.

Apple products at a hugely inflated price do not give results that are hugely better than lower cost alternatives.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
RalphHardwick
Posted 30/12/2013 - 09:51 Link
Gamka wrote:


Memory upgrades - Apple £800, Other suppliers £240 and there is no difference. The chips and cards are made on the same production lines, they are tested to the same standard, they have the same manufacturers part number and labels. One has an Apple labelled pack and the other the manufacturers own label.
Simple answer: use the generic memory

To upgrade my MacBook Pro memory using 'Apple' chips would cost over £200. Using the, identical, non branded chips; £69

Guess which I did.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CaptureLight Ltd
flickr
"I carry a camera to capture memories and the occasional photograph worthy of sharing"
Gamka
Posted 30/12/2013 - 10:04 Link
K10D wrote:
As a last minute Xmas present, I bought my wife an iPad air 128Gb. I bought the max ram version purely for storing her best images.
Look at the prices for the to 128GB versions WiFi and WiFi+Cellular. And extra £100 to add a SIM card slot and RF module - probably around £5 to produce including component cost.

The cost of internal storage - just a change to the SSD module during production. £240 to go from 16GB to 128GB. The full retail price of a high quality SSD lifetime warrranty SSD is around £70 for a 1200GB. Apple will be paying way way less than £70 each for them.
Gamka
Posted 30/12/2013 - 10:08 Link
RalphHardwick wrote:

Simple answer: use the generic memory

To upgrade my MacBook Pro memory using 'Apple' chips would cost over £200. Using the, identical, non branded chips; £69

Guess which I did.
Exactly and that is what I was suggesting. And you could probably have used devices from the same supplier as Apple for £80.
jamieallan
Posted 30/12/2013 - 10:18 Link
MattyH wrote:
Everybody is at some point going to be anti something, But surely it's down to what suits.

I am not an Apple fan, I don't own any other Apple products at all, But...

The iPad IS the best tablet on the market bar none, it has the best screen by a mile, the fastest processor, the best operating system and the number one plus point for me and my family is that it is just so easy to use right out of the box,

Yes it costs a bit more then the others, but so does the Pentax 16-50mm compared to the Pentax 18-55mm....... Both do the same job, one is a lot more pricey then the other, but which would you rather use???

Next term my daughters school is returning all the Samsung tablets and replacing them with the iPad, due to problems with the children getting to grips with the OS and also a number of problems with reliability.

If you can afford the best then why not buy the best, if you can't then buy the best you can afford, that goes for day to day life surely, cars, cameras the type of coffee we drink, the question was, what is the best tablet not what is the most expensive one, oh and by the way that's Panasonic..

And as for paying for apps, I have never paid for one in my life, and have everything I could ever need from the Apple store for free.

So please do not confuse the iPad being the best selling tablet in the world just because everybody wants to jump on the Apple bandwagon, it's the best selling tablet in the world because it's the best current tablet in the world. Fact.

Rant over.
Matty,
I think some of your facts are unfortunately not indeed facts. If you simply trawl the available tablets in PCWorld you'll find the Kindle HDX 7", Nexus 7 7" and Toshiba Excite 10" have quad core processors - as opposed to the iPad dual core, they have greater resolution - 299 to 313 ppi as opposed to iPads 263 ppi, more RAM - 2GB as opposed to 1GB and are approximately half the price.
These are bare bones facts and not how each device performs - but they are facts.
I agree that from most commentary it does appear that non-technical people buying tablets are able to operate an iPad more easily than an Android device but that is subjective. Remember Android phones are in the majority so how does that stack up ? Do they simply use them as phones?

Here's some interesting reading.
http://www.zdnet.com/report-android-dominates-tablet-market-with-over-half-of-gl...
Jamie
MattyH
Posted 30/12/2013 - 10:54 Link
At the end of the day as i have stated for the money, OS, screen, size, weight it is outstanding for what me and my family want it to do, and like i said i am not an Apple fan.

I also drive a Hyundai i40, i drink freshly ground coffee in the morning and i think the USA is a fanstastic country, i vote conservative and dont enjoy soap on tv.

So please pick that one apart....
leytono
Posted 30/12/2013 - 11:04 Link
Quote:
i think the USA is a fanstastic country, i vote conservative
Just goes to show there are a lot of things worse than using Apple products
Edited by leytono: 30/12/2013 - 11:04
jamieallan
Posted 30/12/2013 - 11:17 Link
Matty,
I don't doubt your statement that for what you and your family want it to do the iPad is the correct device for you. I was simply trying to correct some incorrect statements that were put forward as facts. As far as the rest of your last entry I think it's irrelevant to the original post. As a number of people have commented the best idea is to go to your retailer with the most extensive stock and try out a many tablets as possible to find your likes/dislikes and what extras/attachments each tablet has. For instance I'm typing this on a USB connected keyboard to my Samsung Tab 2 which effectively turns it into a mini netbook - cost £3.99 - for the keyboard and cover that is.
Jamie
Edited by jamieallan: 30/12/2013 - 11:18
Gamka
Posted 30/12/2013 - 11:23 Link
jamieallan wrote:
Matty,
For instance I'm typing this on a USB connected keyboard to my Samsung Tab 2 which effectively turns it into a mini netbook - cost £3.99 - for the keyboard and cover that is.
But you could have bought an Apple keypad for £60
pentaxian450
Posted 30/12/2013 - 12:21 Link
I use a 2 years old Sony tablet. It has a full size SD card slot, and it can even use the SD card as a RAM.

It is always in my camera bag. I can use it to review pictures on a decent screen, and send them to other people using the "intelligent" phone as a proxy for internet connection.

A very handy thing.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo