In chains
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:03
Link
Number 1 for me Womble but it needs a little more contrast
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:07
Link
I like them all, it is difficult to pick a favourite. I disagree with Martin (sorry), but I think the low contrast look gives the chains a "strength", that they might not have if you bump the contrast up.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:17
Link
Personally, I don't see a pleasin' composition in any of the shots. They do look flat too.
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:44
Link
Agree with above, more contrast needed
Paul
Paul
Posted 10/05/2009 - 22:45
Link
Interesting shot and I'm with Peter on this, the photos have strength and contrast seems good enough to me.
Posted 10/05/2009 - 23:40
Link
I like the composition of number 2 and perhaps a green filter.
Ian.
Ian.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 08:37
Link
I looked at these photos again just now on my computer at work. On this uncalibrated (and pretty awful) monitor, they do look a bit flat, whearas on my calibrated monitor at home they look just right to me.
Just goes to show what a difference the monitor makes.
Just goes to show what a difference the monitor makes.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Posted 11/05/2009 - 09:27
Link
pschlute wrote:
I looked at these photos again just now on my computer at work. On this uncalibrated (and pretty awful) monitor, they do look a bit flat, whearas on my calibrated monitor at home they look just right to me.
Just goes to show what a difference the monitor makes.
Just wanted to say that both my PC and laptop are calibrated and I calibrate every week, but I still find them a tad flat to MY liking.I looked at these photos again just now on my computer at work. On this uncalibrated (and pretty awful) monitor, they do look a bit flat, whearas on my calibrated monitor at home they look just right to me.
Just goes to show what a difference the monitor makes.
Everyone has their personal choices on how contrasty an image should be. If Kris likes the shot this way then who are we to argue.
Paul
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:02
Link
The flatness or otherwise of the images can be adjusted, and will depend, of course, on the type of paper on which they are printed. I was thinking to arrange these four prints in a square within a single frame although they will need a little work on the cropping to make them all the same size.
Pauly Richard obviously hates them, I am curious as to others views as I rather like them especially when seen as a set.
Best wishes, Kris.
Pauly Richard obviously hates them, I am curious as to others views as I rather like them especially when seen as a set.
Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:11
Link
I have just read the comments from the start, my first comment states that I agree with the above. What I meant was that I agreed that the images looked a little flat. I do not agree with PaulyRichard though (sorry).
I do really like the images and Kris, I do think they will look good printed in a set.
I personally would print them nice and big and have the mount and frame hand made.
Paul
I do really like the images and Kris, I do think they will look good printed in a set.
I personally would print them nice and big and have the mount and frame hand made.
Paul
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:13
Link
Hi Kris,I think your right with the four in one frame.No's 1 & 3 are very similar so flipping one of them would allow for both diagonals to run the same way.Also colour of mount and frame need to be well chosen to make the best of it.My own choice would be something darkish,but that's a matter of personal taste.
My own favourites are 1 & 2.Tony.
My own favourites are 1 & 2.Tony.
K7,DA*50-135, 35mmLTD Macro, 21mm Ltd, Voightlaender 58mm 1.4 NOKTON SL,Ricoh GRD,GRX, Zeiss 100mm f2 Makro Planar.Zeiss Ikon ZM,Zeiss f1.5 C Sonnar.
It ain't no sin to take off your skin,and dance around in your bones.Tom Waits.
It ain't no sin to take off your skin,and dance around in your bones.Tom Waits.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:31
Link
Tony-O wrote:
Hi Kris,I think your right with the four in one frame.No's 1 & 3 are very similar so flipping one of them would allow for both diagonals to run the same way...
I had already flipped one so that it would run the other way! I'll do some low quality prints and try arranging them in different ways.Hi Kris,I think your right with the four in one frame.No's 1 & 3 are very similar so flipping one of them would allow for both diagonals to run the same way...
As a matter of curiosity, I tried a high contrast version of one of them...

I have probably overdone that one.
Perhaps I should post the original PEF file and people could play with it :
Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:38
Link
Hi Kris,Great minds and all thatThe contrasty one to my eye, on my monitor is more satisfying.Tony
K7,DA*50-135, 35mmLTD Macro, 21mm Ltd, Voightlaender 58mm 1.4 NOKTON SL,Ricoh GRD,GRX, Zeiss 100mm f2 Makro Planar.Zeiss Ikon ZM,Zeiss f1.5 C Sonnar.
It ain't no sin to take off your skin,and dance around in your bones.Tom Waits.
It ain't no sin to take off your skin,and dance around in your bones.Tom Waits.
Posted 11/05/2009 - 10:41
Link
i like the new one,
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



7661 posts
17 years
Hertfordshire,
mostly.
All with the K10D, FA 43mm Ltd.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.