I would like your opinion Please
Sorry I can't help further but undoubtedly some one with the knowledge will give you some pointers regarding models etc.
Regards
http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77
Other people who did this had a range of equipment from Apple to high end pc's.
I returned a perfect score whilst some with kit worth 4 or 5 times my laptop returned scores ranging from poor to very poor.
If you have a good LCD panel in a laptop, you have a good LCD panel. Doesn't matter if its housed in a laptop or a flat panel monitor.
Many Laptops today have very good graphics cards too.
I wouldn't discount a laptop for editing.
Hope thats helpful.
The narrow viewing angle (compared to a desktop LCD) means the brightness and contrast is not consistent from top to bottom from a single viewing position.
I edit my photos with my laptop sometimes. I'd say the most important thing about laptops is the display. Quality 17" display would be good, not too big to carry along, but probably big enough for comfortable viewing. My laptop has a 15" display and it's far from great quality. Although one can usually connect the laptop to a quality external display, a good display in the laptop is worth every penny IMO, because you probably don't want to drag a large external display with you.
Also important would be the amount of RAM (though you can usually add more later), 4 gigs of that, because 32 bit operating systems can't use more than about 3,5 gigs. 64 bits opsys might be the way to go if you do some serious multitasking. A fast dual core processor should be fast enough, unless one does lots of background tasks at the same time. The hard drive should be at least 320 gigs and not too slow (I think most laptops have enough storage room, but some laptop drives are somewhat slow although you usually can swith for a bigger and faster model later). A nice range of connections, for an external display and perhaps even HDMI for example. Windows 7 is probably a good choice for the OS as it's the newest and pretty fast, Vista is slower, or so some experts say, though I never had any big problems with Vista. These are some things that come to my mind.
Good luck with hunting for the best alternative
Regards Tobio
Tobio
K20d with Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro , smc da 18-55 mm, smc da 50-200 mm and smc da 55-300 mm + Metz 58 af-1. Editing with Pentax Photolab, Gimp and Paint.net.
My suggestion would therefore be to hook up to a good quality external monitor if you're editing.
Things to check for -
built in card reader,
high res screen,
numberpad (not necessary for editing but damn handy)
As many usb ports as possible.
I did see a laptop somewhere the other day with a built in pen tablet next to the mouse pad but unfortunatley i cant remember the make or where i saw it.
It's a superb computer except for one thing. I hate the glossy screen, it's like working in a mirror and the slightest deflection in viewing angle changes the picture ( or my perception of it ) dramatically.
My old Toshiba, which I got fixed, has a matt screen which was lovely to work with, which is why it gets more use than the new HP.
The trend seems to be that all laptops have the glossy screens, but the computer place that fixed the Toshiba said they can fit a matt screen to the HP and they do quite a few for photographers.
1st point, what is your budget, and what would you like to achieve?
It is possible to have a decent screen on a laptop, it is possible to calibrate them. Personal advice here, go for matte, not glossy, resolution not size. For example a 1440x900 resolution on a 17" monitor is in my opinion a complete waste of space and should be avoided at all costs! My current laptop has a 1920 x 1200 resolution on a 17" screen, which is fantastic for editing, when I want to.
The point above depends on the 1st point though, what's your budget?
A poor screen on a laptop with a limited budget could be perfectly acceptable to you as you could use your existing monitor as the main editing screen when you get home, just using the laptop screen for more basic use only
A laptop may be a poor choice completely if you only have a limited budget. With 1TB drives at less than £70 for desktops and not even available for laptops, a small budget would go a lot further with a desktop.
We have been very lucky and fortunate, (mainly due to not having any kids!) to be able to get what we wanted, so maybe an example from a different perspective?
At home, we have a Mac Pro with 2x Quad core Xeons, 30 inch screen with 2560x1600 resolution, 10GB RAM & 4x 1TB hard drives. When we are out shooting, the MacBook Pro is in the camera bag, so we can work on site and re-shoot if needed. If there are any shots I really like and want to work on, they get edited on the home machine. If needed (say, the home machine goes faulty) the 30" display could be used on the laptop as well. Both machines have Aperture 3 and CS3 Web Premium Suite.
Now that I have been lucky enough to get used to having this level of kit, if I had to budget with a lot less money, my priorities would be:-
Decent high resolution screen
Aperture 3
Storage space
The only trouble is, I wouldn't know how to choose between only having the desktop or the laptop, as they both excel in different areas. The laptop for it's versatility, the desktop for it's power and expandability.
It's all down to budget though at the end of the day, so if you could give us an idea of your budget & what you actually need, I'm sure we can come up with some more specific advice for you!
On the laptops, either the MacBook or Acer, I also carry an external HD that gives an additional 500GB in the field, which can be then moved to the iMac when I am back home. I will generally download the day's work in the field and evaluate if anything has to be redone. I can also make back-ups and upload to my cloud storage from the field. I do some RAW processing on the laptops, but prefer the iMac.
Whatever you chose, you will have to build a rhythm for your workflow and be comfortable with it along with taking that all important decision regarding your budget. Good luck!
The Photomonk
Pete, I did the test. Scored a 12. Not to bad I guess for this Old Compaq and my OLD eyes. By looking at the results could have been worse.
Lloydy, I never would have thought about a matt screen. I'll have to check that out. Thanks.
Unlocker, I don't really have a budget for this project. I just want to buy one that will fit the purpose. I know there are people that use laptops for editing. There will be things they like, and things they don't like. I just wanted to get some input from people that use them before I have to listen the the sales pitch.
Thanks again to everyone for your comments.
Steven
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
I would rather use my desktop to be honest, but the laptop was prompted by the need to download photos while I was on the move and the fact my newly purchased PS CS3 would not load on the PC
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
63 posts
14 years
Buffalo,
Wyoming USA
What are some things I should consider if it's main purpose is photo editing?
Thanks,
Steven