Visit MPB Visit MPB Visit MPB

I would like your opinion Please

robbie_d
Posted 12/03/2010 - 14:40 Link
ripstar74 wrote:
Unlocker wrote:
Quote:

My point was and still is if you buy Apple, then you are paying a premium just for the name.

Apple are the only people that make Apple computers and therefore set thier prices as they wish.

I'm sorry, but I still don't get your point.

I was just pointing out the price difference for a machine that does the same task. You seem to be very agressive towards me for making this point. Is it because you feel some sort of buyers remorse and feel like you have to defend your decision to buy Apple?

Look, if the OP wants an Apple and understands the difference (including the price) then i`m not going to tell him he made a bad choice. At the end of the day you can edit phots on a mac, and you can edit photos on a pc. Neither will do it faster or better than the other. On the other hand an Aston Martin will go faster, and do things that your Renault cannot.

Not as much as you might think. Aston DBS is only 15 seconds quicker round the Nurburgring (Nordschleife) than the quickest Renault. That equates to around £137,000 for one second per mile.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.

Apparently.
Edited by robbie_d: 12/03/2010 - 14:54
ripstar74
Posted 12/03/2010 - 14:45 Link
Just to TRY and get the thread back on track, did anyone look at the Lenovo W700? The more i see about it the better it gets. Not only does it have a graphics tablet built in AND a retractable second screen, it ALSO has a built screen calibrator ! WOW.
K7,K10d,16-50 Da*,50-135 Da*. Looking for a good macro.

My Website
robbie_d
Posted 12/03/2010 - 14:53 Link
ripstar74 wrote:
Just to TRY and get the thread back on track, did anyone look at the Lenovo W700? The more i see about it the better it gets. Not only does it have a graphics tablet built in AND a retractable second screen, it ALSO has a built screen calibrator ! WOW.

It looks pretty good.

Not sure what I'd use the second screen for (used to have dual screen in my office but never really used it, and haven't missed it since I stopped it). The built in graphics tablet is intriguing, but it would only really be useful if the display was good (many people don't like editing on laptops due to the display).

My main reservation with it is the size, 17" laptops really aren't that portable, and if you're not going to be taking it out and about you might be better off with a desktop.

The feature set is certainly interesting though. I remember Toshiba used to do a laptop with a swivel screen that effectively became a tablet (with handwriting recognition). Very useful if you need to make notes etc. when walking about, and don't want to have to type up after (as I was doing a lot of at the time).

Plus, at UK prices the W700 is hardly a cheap option.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.

Apparently.
Edited by robbie_d: 12/03/2010 - 14:55
ripstar74
Posted 12/03/2010 - 15:20 Link
Yes it is quite pricey, another good feature is the ability to have two external monitors.

It is aimed at the graphic, photographic, engineering market so i`m sure the screen would be high quality.
K7,K10d,16-50 Da*,50-135 Da*. Looking for a good macro.

My Website
Anvh
Posted 12/03/2010 - 15:29 Link
That no one makes a laptop designed for graphics designer?
Dell have some but they are price ^^;
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 12/03/2010 - 15:30
Aiki
Posted 12/03/2010 - 16:12 Link
I do use laptop.

BUT, I use also another screen (external, additional...or how should it be named)
I cant imagine working on only one screen any more. Too little room
I open the pic on the additional screen and most of the menus etc are on laptop screen. So my image is "clear" while editing.
Aiki

----
Pentax K20D; SMC DA 18-55mm II kit; Sigma AF 70-300/4-5.6 APO DG MACRO
GIMP Flickr
PPG
thoughton
Posted 12/03/2010 - 17:03 Link
Anvh wrote:
But Tim do you think the Apple computers are worth the price when looking at the hardware?
You can easily compare them now since they use the same hardware as PC do.

If you could easily install Mac on a PC just like Windows or Linux, would you still buy a Apple computer then and do you think Apple could still sell them at those prices as they do now?

Stefan, comments like this just serve to illustrate that you do not understand Macs at all. It is completely NOT about the hardware. Not in the slightest. Apple have changed the Mac processor architecture 3 times now without any difference to their UI. It is ALL about the the user experience.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
thoughton
Posted 12/03/2010 - 17:09 Link
ripstar74 wrote:
Just to TRY and get the thread back on track, did anyone look at the Lenovo W700? The more i see about it the better it gets. Not only does it have a graphics tablet built in AND a retractable second screen, it ALSO has a built screen calibrator ! WOW.

You are completely off your rocker

First you complain that Mac laptops are 3 times the cost of PC laptops.

Now you are suggesting the Lenovo W700.

A MacBook Pro costs between £900 and £1900 depending on configuration. I won't bother listing the prices of the cheaper Macbooks.

A quick look on Google Shopping tells me that your Lenovo W700 costs between £1400 and £4000(!!!).
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 12/03/2010 - 17:12
bretti_kivi
Posted 12/03/2010 - 17:13 Link
.... I have a MacbookPro on my desk at work right now. I'm nonplussed about it. It's a computer. And?
I haven't had a fully working desktop now for five years. Not at work (discounting test machines) and not at home, either. Thinkpads (600E, T23, R40, T60) or now a Dell D600 and E6400. I don't see any problems, though if it was mine I'd want at least a 15" widescreen, preferably something even bigger. The old test box had a 24 and that was great.

I think I might go for a fast dual core with 8GB running SSH at home, that way I could process pics from wherever whenever I uploaded them.

Bret
my pics: link
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
Anvh
Posted 12/03/2010 - 17:40 Link
thoughton wrote:
Anvh wrote:
But Tim do you think the Apple computers are worth the price when looking at the hardware?
You can easily compare them now since they use the same hardware as PC do.

If you could easily install Mac on a PC just like Windows or Linux, would you still buy a Apple computer then and do you think Apple could still sell them at those prices as they do now?

Stefan, comments like this just serve to illustrate that you do not understand Macs at all. It is completely NOT about the hardware. Not in the slightest. Apple have changed the Mac processor architecture 3 times now without any difference to their UI. It is ALL about the the user experience.

Of course it's about hardware, you want the processor to do calculations right or are you saying the Mac Pro is just as good as a Mac Mini

They use off of the shelve Intel processors and Nvidia cards with custom firmware but you can flash those.
So how did Mac alter the processor architecture? I've no idea how you can do that with software, might be my limited knowledge.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
thoughton
Posted 12/03/2010 - 17:50 Link
It's your limited knowledge, sorry Macs originally used Motorola 68000 series processors. In the 90s they switched to IBM PowerPC RISC processors. Recently they switched again to Intel processors. Each time they did this the entire OS was re-written (and included a built-in emulator to run old code). Modern Macs still have the PowerPC emulator in them now.

A Mac Mini can do anything a Mac Pro can do (excepting physical limitations like fewer ports, or lack of a humongous graphics card, etc), it just does it slower.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 12/03/2010 - 17:54
Steveninwyoming
Posted 12/03/2010 - 18:02 Link
Boy did I sturr up a hornets nest. For those that are wondering yes I do live in wonderful Wyoming, USA. Some of the finest trout fishing in the world right out my back door.

I didn't mean to cause an argument about which laptop was best or worst. I was and still am looking for information from people that use laptops.
Things they like, dislike, or would change if they purchased another. There have been some informative tips here and I thank everyone for their input.

Thanks again to everyone. Even the debate was interesting.
Steven
Steveninwyoming
Posted 12/03/2010 - 18:14 Link
Photomonk wrote:
technoidiot wrote:
Add to that Staff who are enthusiastic about the stuff they sell

I hate to be a spoil sport, but if Steven really does live in Wyoming, visiting an Apple store will have to be a holiday of a few days, since the closest one is at least 500 miles away. link Thus he may have to rely on what is local or the internet.

The Photomonk

I checked out the link. There is not even an apple store in the state of Wyoming. The closest one is Denver, Colorado. 400 miles away. Dont want to make the trip just to look LOL.
Steven
Anvh
Posted 12/03/2010 - 18:29 Link
Yes Tim but I ain't asking that.
How does The intel processor differ in the Mac then those you can buy for your PC, that's what I'm asking.

The current Macbook pro use:
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550, P8400, P7570, P8700, P8800 or T9600
nVidia GeForce 9600M GT
4GB (two 2GB) of 1066 MHz PC3-8500 DDR3 SO-DIMM SDRAM

All hardware you can get for your pc as well that means you can compare prices.
can't find a notebook with the same specs so fast.

Lets get a Mac Pro
The cheapest one with HD 4870 (512mb) is €2.479,00
Now the HP z400 has almost the same when you also buy a ASUS HD 4870 (sorry 1GB was cheaper ) that comes down in total € 1.342,36
Now I wonder why there is a € 1.000,- price difference, that's a reasonable question to ask right?

Or don't I get the point about the Mac now?
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
ripstar74
Posted 12/03/2010 - 20:28 Link
thoughton wrote:
ripstar74 wrote:
Just to TRY and get the thread back on track, did anyone look at the Lenovo W700? The more i see about it the better it gets. Not only does it have a graphics tablet built in AND a retractable second screen, it ALSO has a built screen calibrator ! WOW.

You are completely off your rocker

First you complain that Mac laptops are 3 times the cost of PC laptops.

Now you are suggesting the Lenovo W700.

A MacBook Pro costs between £900 and £1900 depending on configuration. I won't bother listing the prices of the cheaper Macbooks.

A quick look on Google Shopping tells me that your Lenovo W700 costs between £1400 and £4000(!!!).

I`m not suggesting the OP buys one , just bringing them to everyones attention and commenting that i think its a very innovative machine. Thats all.

You are obviousley very attatched to Apple products judging by your somewhat aggresive defense of the products, and good for you. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, right?

My opinion is they are overpriced. This is an open forum and if i want to state that i think they are overpriced i should be able to do so without being attacked from all angles by someone who disagrees.
K7,K10d,16-50 Da*,50-135 Da*. Looking for a good macro.

My Website

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.