HDR

philstaff
Posted 09/12/2010 - 14:09 Link
I Can not say Im a big fan of this type of photo but seeing I have the option to take HDR photos and have the processed in camera on the KR, can I ask the qustion. Which type of photo do you find this function best suited too.
Regards Ian
johnriley
Posted 09/12/2010 - 14:17 Link
Particularly architecture I think.
Best regards, John
bretti_kivi
Posted 09/12/2010 - 14:28 Link
.. or stills with lights in and otherwise dark areas.

Bret
my pics: link
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
snappychappy
Posted 09/12/2010 - 14:39 Link
Images with areas of deep shadow's and bright area's.
philstaff
Posted 09/12/2010 - 15:13 Link
From the quick feed back I can think of one photo shoot that might work realy well. Durham cathederel might be a nice subject at night time when lite up.
Regards Ian
pentaxian450
Posted 09/12/2010 - 17:38 Link
In camera HDR is useful when you need to preserve both highlights and shadows and you don't have time to do proper processing of the picture(s). You will never get what you can get with proper HDR processing, but it comes in real handy when taking pictures inside a building, and you still want to have the details you can see through the windows instead of a white blob.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Smeggypants
Posted 09/12/2010 - 19:44 Link
Any scene that isn't too busy - HDR takes the depth out of anything IMO. Once saw a HDR of a night cityscape. Hong Kong I think it was. the HDR totally ruined it. a real mess.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
RAB
Posted 09/12/2010 - 20:14 Link
I find some HDR shots straight from the camera can be quite bland however it can work really well with some landscapes, bringing a huge amount of detail to an otherwise bland sky.
"He's not the Messiah, ..."
Edited by RAB: 09/12/2010 - 20:14
philstaff
Posted 10/12/2010 - 10:37 Link
Thanks guys I can think of a few places localy to try this function out.
Regards Ian
gartmore
Posted 10/12/2010 - 13:20 Link
The definition of a gentleman: someone who knows how to use HDR but chooses not too.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
bwlchmawr
Posted 10/12/2010 - 13:24 Link
gartmore wrote:
The definition of a gentleman: someone who knows how to use HDR but chooses not too.
Nominated as my favourite post of the month.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Smeggypants
Posted 10/12/2010 - 20:37 Link
RAB wrote:
I find some HDR shots straight from the camera can be quite bland however it can work really well with some landscapes, bringing a huge amount of detail to an otherwise bland sky.
Lightroom's graduated filters do this admirably already
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
MrCynical
Posted 10/12/2010 - 21:49 Link
It can work well with landscapes, and can also work well for indoor scenes where the outside is much brighter (i.e. sunny day) to avoid whiteout windows. However, exposing for the outside and using a flash/diffuser to make up the difference tends to work better in the latter case.

Smeggypants wrote:
Lightroom's graduated filters do this admirably already
Not when the clouds are blown out in the original RAW, they don't.
Edited by MrCynical: 10/12/2010 - 21:50
PaulEvans
Posted 11/12/2010 - 08:27 Link
Another vote for Lightrooms grad filters - but of course only if you shoot RAW. I've recently started using them "the other way up" to lighten and apply other effects to a dark foreground. Can work very well.

Personally I've not seen much HDR work I've been convinced with. At the end of the day I aim for something that represents what I saw at the time and HDR usually doesn't. Always exceptions of course.

Where the dark areas are close to the camera a little discrete fill in flash can work wonders. Particularly as our cameras allow us to control the intensity!

Paul
K3ii, DA16-85, DA35mm Limited, FA77mm Limited, 55mm f1.8 K, 135mm f3.5 M, DA300, DA 1.4 HD TC,
DA16-45, Sigma 15mm f2.8. Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro
Timmy2Knocks
Posted 11/12/2010 - 10:08 Link
Go out and experiment gets my vote.

Hdr for some reason brings out the worst of people in photography circles. It's like you have stolen there soul the way they bang on about it.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo