HDR ?

Mike-P
Posted 15/08/2008 - 20:15 Link
Why do my attempts at HDR not look HDR ..ish.
I am bracketing 3 shots, converting to .tiff (as I read this keeps more information than jpeg) and then running it through Photomatix pro.

Comment Image


It doesn't seem to look much different to the original though.
Tyr
Posted 15/08/2008 - 21:48 Link
First off, what is that UFO on the right? I thought it was on my screen at first

HDR isn't always worth it. If you have good even lighting then just a little curve adjustment and maybe tone mapping can do everything you want.
George Lazarette
Posted 15/08/2008 - 21:48 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Why do my attempts at HDR not look HDR ..ish?
Because you are doing it right?

But wearing my cynic's hat, I ask: Because you are doing it wrong?

A natural looking HDR shot is a rare bird indeed. Many people over-sharpen and over-saturate their photographs, and by the same token, many people tend to exaggerate the HDR effect. You haven't. Thank you for your restraint.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
ChrisA
Posted 15/08/2008 - 21:57 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Why do my attempts at HDR not look HDR ..ish.
Well it does a bit.

Either that or you've used nicely-balanced fill-in flash with a guide number of about 100,000.

But I prefer the restrained look too. I occasionally like impressionism, but in small doses, and in a kind of "hmm", sort of way.

________
PS... I'm curious as to why some of the sensor spots look like they have ghosts down and to the right a little.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Edited by ChrisA: 15/08/2008 - 21:59
Nimitz
Posted 15/08/2008 - 21:59 Link
What is the goal? You want it to look fake?

Use the sliders for white and black point. Move them to the right - and it will change dramatically.

Also - use a higher lightsmoothing to avoid the halo you have here.

For a fake look - use a high saturation and strong contrast setting.
George Lazarette
Posted 15/08/2008 - 22:05 Link
Tyr wrote:
First off, what is that UFO on the right? I thought it was on my screen at first
It's an aeroplane full of tourists going back to Birmingham.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Mike-P
Posted 15/08/2008 - 22:13 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Tyr wrote:
First off, what is that UFO on the right? I thought it was on my screen at first
It's an aeroplane full of tourists going back to Birmingham.

G
Correct, Alicante airport is about 20 kilometers directly behind the monument.
Actually, the more I look at it the more I like it this way.
Edited by Mike-P: 15/08/2008 - 22:14
Hyram
Posted 16/08/2008 - 13:41 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Tyr wrote:
First off, what is that UFO on the right? I thought it was on my screen at first
It's an aeroplane full of tourists going back to Birmingham.

G
Birmingham UK or Birmingham USA :

Not that Birmingham City Council knows the difference
Hyram

Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
George Lazarette
Posted 16/08/2008 - 20:46 Link
Hyram wrote:
Birmingham UK or Birmingham USA :

Not that Birmingham City Council knows the difference
Too right! Those Brummies are a mixed-up lot. They spend all their time on the Costa Packet, which is why they called the centre of their home town the Bullring. But their favourite food isn't paella, it's curry in a bucket, AKA balti.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
xbow
Posted 16/08/2008 - 22:43 Link
Apart from dust on the sensor it looks ok to me - nice pic.
K5, LightRoom 5
Sigma 8-16 Pentax DA 16-45 Pentax DA 55-300 Pentax 18-55WR Tamron 90 Di Macro Metz 44 AF-1
Mike-P
Posted 16/08/2008 - 22:49 Link
xbow wrote:
Apart from dust on the sensor it looks ok to me - nice pic.
mmm, I cleaned the sensor after zooming in to look at the "ufo", which is actually 2 airplanes if you look closely where there was a difference in the time it took to bracket the 3 shots.
Edited by Mike-P: 16/08/2008 - 22:51
Daniel Bridge
Posted 16/08/2008 - 23:19 Link
Are you bracketing shutter speed or aperture?

[quote="ChrisA"]PS... I'm curious as to why some of the sensor spots look like they have ghosts down and to the right a little.[/quote]Me too, but the way the 'ghosts' are bigger, would indicate a larger aperture, so f/8 and f/6.7 or something like that.

The sky looks odd just above the mountains, I'm guessing that it was pretty washed out here, and Photomatix has darkened it. And as Nimitz mentioned, there's a halo around the tower. So it does look like an HDR, just not so obviously as some.

Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
royd63uk
Posted 17/08/2008 - 10:43 Link
I like it as is.Cant be doing with over done HDR.
Roy
regards
Roy

Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/

my pbase gallery

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo