Doves
Posted 07/06/2018 - 18:01
Link
It is Haris 😁👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Really sharp, no complaints 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Really sharp, no complaints 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
I know what i like, If not always why.
Posted 08/06/2018 - 02:21 - Helpful Comment
Link
Wow
I'm thinking I might be on the lookout for one since it works so damn well. Right now I haven't got a telephoto zoom (apart from the 50-135 which is pretty cool I guess) so something like that 70-200 would be great. It's such an 'ugly' lens but the quality is mindblowing.
For everyone else, he's using a Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8. It's got DG designation as far as I can remember but it seems to be the old highly rated one, without 'macro'. What a lens.
I'm thinking I might be on the lookout for one since it works so damn well. Right now I haven't got a telephoto zoom (apart from the 50-135 which is pretty cool I guess) so something like that 70-200 would be great. It's such an 'ugly' lens but the quality is mindblowing.
For everyone else, he's using a Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8. It's got DG designation as far as I can remember but it seems to be the old highly rated one, without 'macro'. What a lens.
All the gear with no idea
Posted 13/06/2018 - 01:52
Link
HarisF1 wrote:
Wow
I'm thinking I might be on the lookout for one since it works so damn well. Right now I haven't got a telephoto zoom (apart from the 50-135 which is pretty cool I guess) so something like that 70-200 would be great. It's such an 'ugly' lens but the quality is mindblowing.
For everyone else, he's using a Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8. It's got DG designation as far as I can remember but it seems to be the old highly rated one, without 'macro'. What a lens.
Just bought that lens this past week! I am in "LOVE" I found it on the market...open box for $1200 Canadian, usually retails for $2200Wow
I'm thinking I might be on the lookout for one since it works so damn well. Right now I haven't got a telephoto zoom (apart from the 50-135 which is pretty cool I guess) so something like that 70-200 would be great. It's such an 'ugly' lens but the quality is mindblowing.
For everyone else, he's using a Sigma EX 70-200 f/2.8. It's got DG designation as far as I can remember but it seems to be the old highly rated one, without 'macro'. What a lens.
That would be 689.58 Pound sterling.
PS...It is really heave though!
Posted 14/06/2018 - 00:10
Link
Hi JA, if it's the same as mine, I'm sure you will love it.
You will get used to the weight of it, it is stunningly sharp. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
You will get used to the weight of it, it is stunningly sharp. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
I know what i like, If not always why.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2322 posts
13 years
Wicklow Ireland
_IMG6263edsm by dr.shutter, on Flickr
_IMG6303ed2sm by dr.shutter, on Flickr
_IMG6375eds by dr.shutter, on Flickr
_IMG6398edsm by dr.shutter, on Flickr
_IMG6419edsm by dr.shutter, on Flickr