Visit MPB Visit MPB Visit MPB

double kit lenses or body plus another

HarryH
Posted 14/10/2010 - 14:02 Link
Hi
I am about to buy a K7. The kit lenses seem a bit on the cheap side. 18-55mm & 50-200mm WR Lenses.
Would I be better buying a body plus single lens of better quality?
Thanks
Harry
johnriley
Posted 14/10/2010 - 14:31 Link
The WR lenses are excellent and the weather resistance a very useful bonus. For the price they are when included in a kit they are well worth having.
Best regards, John
thoughton
Posted 14/10/2010 - 14:39 Link
Definitely buy them in the kit, you can always sell them and reduce the body price even further.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Dangermouse
Posted 14/10/2010 - 14:48 Link
They may be cheap but they aren't nasty by any means, plus the WR seals make them very handy indeed.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Pentaxophile
Posted 14/10/2010 - 20:41 Link
The 18-55 definitely does not make the most of the k7 sensor (not tried the 50-200). Very useful for wet weather conditions though, and it's probably good enough most of the time to be honest. My first copy was very soft on one side, and needed exchanging.
[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]
Dangermouse
Posted 14/10/2010 - 21:43 Link
I don't think Pentax do anything that's cheap, ultra-sharp, and has the WR seals? The 18-55mm is preferable to wrecking a more expensive lens by taking it out in the rain.

You definitely won't feel that you've wasted any money on those lenses, anyway. Both are very capable and will enable you to work out what focal length you use most, thereby enabling you to buy the right length lens if you decide to upgrade.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
HarryH
Posted 14/10/2010 - 21:49 Link
Thanks for your advice guys. I held a K7 today. I also held a Nikons and Canons retailing at from £500 to £1000 and none of them could hold a candle to the K7.
Smeggypants
Posted 15/10/2010 - 00:55 Link
HarryH wrote:
Thanks for your advice guys. I held a K7 today. I also held a Nikons and Canons retailing at from £500 to £1000 and none of them could hold a candle to the K7.

Nice one

I didn't sell my 18-55 kit lens that came with my K20D body even though I soon upgraded from it.

There's a big difference in IQ between the kit lens and a Pentax DA* lens, but the kit lens isn't rubbish by any means. It's worth more to me to keep as a spare than the £30 I'd get by selling it.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.