Dead tree & some photomatix HDR
Posted 03/10/2018 - 22:38
Link
Hi Andy
I like the last two best
I like the last two best
cheers Neil
pentax k3
DA* 300 f4 DA* 50-135 f 2.8 smc DA* 16-50 f2.8 50mm f1.7 pentax1.4xhd converter
Panasonic Dmc Fz200
pentax k3
DA* 300 f4 DA* 50-135 f 2.8 smc DA* 16-50 f2.8 50mm f1.7 pentax1.4xhd converter
Panasonic Dmc Fz200
Posted 03/10/2018 - 22:53
Link
Wow, that software has some great abilities. I really like the composition and 6 just stands out!
Posted 08/10/2018 - 16:00
Link
It's really interesting to see just how different they all are and the extent to which so much of what we now see in the photography world is so heavily edited.
See, I'd have no.2 on my wall, but none of the others, but that's simply because my eye finds it jarring to look at things so obviously unrealistic.
Thanks for sharing
See, I'd have no.2 on my wall, but none of the others, but that's simply because my eye finds it jarring to look at things so obviously unrealistic.
Thanks for sharing
Posted 08/10/2018 - 16:47
Link
Thanks all for the comments - I agree no 6 stands out and grabs the eye; however the 'purist' in me would follow danofmk and tend to go for the one that appears to be more realistic!
Andy
Posted 08/10/2018 - 19:24
Link
For me number 2 looks best, nice capture 👏
Pentax ME-F, MZ-3 RIP, MZ-S, K-1
Irix 15mm F2.4, Pentax D-FA 24-70mm F2.8, FA 31mm F1.8 Ltd, FA 43mm F1.9 Ltd, FA 77mm F1.8 Ltd, Sigma 100-300 F4 + TC 1.4x, AF 540 FGZ
Ricoh GR III
Hitech-Formatt 10% off all filters code - CIEJ10
Irix 15mm F2.4, Pentax D-FA 24-70mm F2.8, FA 31mm F1.8 Ltd, FA 43mm F1.9 Ltd, FA 77mm F1.8 Ltd, Sigma 100-300 F4 + TC 1.4x, AF 540 FGZ
Ricoh GR III
Hitech-Formatt 10% off all filters code - CIEJ10
Posted 11/10/2018 - 13:31
Link
This is a wonderfully composed image, and the different presets are quite interesting to see. I wonder how you would have processed them yourself? Would it have been close to one of these or totally different? I sometimes use presets (in silverfx) to get an idea of what I can do - but often find they go in direction(s) I'm not interested in.
Anyway, great shot, and great post!
Anyway, great shot, and great post!
Posted 11/10/2018 - 15:11
Link
Hi Serge - I tend to try and be real to the original scene, bearing mind our eyes do perceive things in a different way to the camera sensor - so no2 (which happens to be one of the Realistic settings for me), and maybe as I recall perhaps a little more 'punch' to it.
Andy
Posted 11/10/2018 - 16:16
Link
alfpics wrote:
so no2
The one I like best also, I feel the others want to bring out too much of what isn't quite visible in the original.so no2
Myself, I would probably go in the other direction and go for more of a silhouette... there is so much we can see and do with our images!
Posted 11/10/2018 - 17:03
Link
Sry wrote:
Yes and within each preset, you can tweak to your heart's content - or confusion and end up not being able to make up your mind!!
alfpics wrote:
so no2
there is so much we can see and do with our images!so no2
Andy
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1946 posts
21 years
North Devon
The original images were three shots exposed at 1.3 stops apart. The first shot here is the middle exposure without any tweaking (ie direct RAW to jpeg conversion);
The HDR shots, again, are straight out of Photomatix, saved as TIFF and then converted to jpeg for upload without further adjustments
2. Realistic 2
3. Detailed
4. Painterly 5
5. Interior 4
6. Creative
7. Monochrome 2
C&C welcome!