Could I Defect
Posted 11/02/2009 - 23:10
Link
OK I know what you are saying but I was impressed with the spec.
Posted 11/02/2009 - 23:15
Link
I'm willing to bet the results would be somewhat less spectacular than the spec somehow...
Joining the Q
Posted 12/02/2009 - 01:44
Link
Super strong zoom : What does that mean, can you use it to jack up your car if bogged in the desert :
I guess its in direct competion with Canons G10 :
I guess its in direct competion with Canons G10 :
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Posted 12/02/2009 - 10:05
Link
Nah, you really can't compare it with a DSLR IMHO.
I had a Fuji S9500 bridge camera before I got my first DSLR and whilst it was pretty impressive, macro to 300 mm equivalent, nice colours etc. But it just couldn't hold a candle to my E-510 and the set of lenses I eventually purchased. But I guess why should it? ...it was much cheaper
I had a Fuji S9500 bridge camera before I got my first DSLR and whilst it was pretty impressive, macro to 300 mm equivalent, nice colours etc. But it just couldn't hold a candle to my E-510 and the set of lenses I eventually purchased. But I guess why should it? ...it was much cheaper
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1450 posts
18 years