Classic harbour scene, but does it work?

ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 09:53 Link
I can't make up my mind about this one. On the one hand, the Opera House is very small in the frame. But it appeals to me more than it otherwise would because of all the lines that take the eye to it (as well as the wake, there's the bridge, the line of clouds, the buildings, and the boat).

Not sure if they do the trick, or just heighten the disappointment when you get to where they lead.

What do you think?

Comment Image
Clarky
Posted 01/11/2007 - 10:08 Link
It doesn't work for me, its too far away for my liking. The boat wake is a little distracting also.
It would have made a nice panaramic shot if you were closer and managed to get off 3 or 4 shots
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 11:09 Link
Quote:
It doesn't work for me, its too far away for my liking. The boat wake is a little distracting also.
It would have made a nice panaramic shot if you were closer and managed to get off 3 or 4 shots
I'm inclined to agree. It's showing the limitation of the lens a bit, at full size (although I can probably fix the CA), as well as some somewhat rushed PP, but do you like this more?
gartmore
Posted 01/11/2007 - 12:27 Link
I think you could dodge the boat's wake a bit and lift the sea a little overall and this would lead the eye in more. I'd straighten the horizon too.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 12:30 Link
Quote:
I'd straighten the horizon too.
Nice one. I was wondering if anyone would pick that up. Welcome to the honourable society of people that can detect a 0.15 degree rotation by eye.



I agree it's off, but having fooled about with rotating it by very small amounts, I concluded it's not off as much as it looks at first glance, since the shores are not at the same angle.
gartmore
Posted 01/11/2007 - 12:50 Link
I think its worth staightening!
Comment Image
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 13:05 Link
Quote:
I think its worth staightening!
Hmm. How much was that? Looks a bit too much to me.
johnriley
Posted 01/11/2007 - 16:28 Link
I like the image a lot. The clouds and the wake lead the eye into the picture and the colour is great.

It would make a fantastic final image in a Pictures2Exe slide show.
Best regards, John
gartmore
Posted 01/11/2007 - 17:20 Link
Quote:
gartmore wrote:
I think its worth staightening!
Hmm. How much was that? Looks a bit too much to me.
I just used the staightening tool, clicked on one side and dragged to the other. It is bang on, you can check just be scrolling down this page. It is funny that sometimes 'correct' can look 'wrong'
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
justgetoutandride
Posted 01/11/2007 - 18:13 Link
I suggest loosing about a third of the lower half to loose the rough part of the wake.
Please call me aj,

I use a Pentax K10D, on a MacBook with LightRoom (vers 1.3 + beta 2)

http://www.ba-joseph.co.uk/gallery
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 18:14 Link
Quote:
ChrisA wrote:
Quote:
I think its worth staightening!
Hmm. How much was that? Looks a bit too much to me.
I just used the staightening tool, clicked on one side and dragged to the other. It is bang on, you can check just be scrolling down this page. It is funny that sometimes 'correct' can look 'wrong'
Sorry, I must be being thick.

Straightening tool in what?

And how can I check just by scrolling down? : :
Clarky
Posted 01/11/2007 - 18:44 Link
I like the close up version better

The straightening tool in Picasa is pretty good
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 18:59 Link
Quote:
The straightening tool in Picasa is pretty good
It is, but if you're going to use the grid, there needs to be a genuine horizontal or vertical line in the picture.

Otherwise, it's still the same judgement call - and if, as in this case, there's a receding shoreline, it won't necessarily be right to make the line it makes horizontal.

Not saying my original one was spot on, though - I think Gartmore was right to pick me up on it.
kcmadr
Posted 01/11/2007 - 19:03 Link
Maybe lose a third of the sky and three quarters of the water to turn it into a pano?
ChrisA
Posted 01/11/2007 - 19:05 Link
Quote:
Maybe lose a third of the sky and three quarters of the water to turn it into a pano?
Almost what you're asking for - check this out.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo