Allium
Posted 06/07/2021 - 21:48
Link
The first stands head and shoulders above the second for me. There's a sense of depth that the second one lacks. And the second looks rather cluttered in comparison.
Was the same aperture used for both? I would have expected the centre of the second to be more out of focus if it was.
Steve
Was the same aperture used for both? I would have expected the centre of the second to be more out of focus if it was.
Steve
Posted 06/07/2021 - 22:48
Link
Lubbyman wrote:
The first stands head and shoulders above the second for me. There's a sense of depth that the second one lacks. And the second looks rather cluttered in comparison.
Was the same aperture used for both? I would have expected the centre of the second to be more out of focus if it was.
Steve
Hi Steve, no the top photo was taken at f4.5, 1/320sec with ISO100 and the second f11, 1/125sec with ISO200. I set out to photograph the seed heads but wasn't happy with the results so with the top photo I deliberately set out for a narrow dof focussed on the centre.
The first stands head and shoulders above the second for me. There's a sense of depth that the second one lacks. And the second looks rather cluttered in comparison.
Was the same aperture used for both? I would have expected the centre of the second to be more out of focus if it was.
Steve
Paul
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
Posted 07/07/2021 - 07:34
Link
Have to agree - that first shot really works so well, but it's not just to do with the point of focus - it's your composition with the central point truly being the dead centre and everything else appearing to "zoom out" from it. Clever shot and super image
LennyBloke
Posted 07/07/2021 - 23:45
Link
I had a bunch of tabs so didn't look at the topic title - that first image really delivered and it took a while before I realised what it was. Agree with the above!
All the gear with no idea
Posted 08/07/2021 - 00:51
Link
Zoom burst without the zoom. Most effective.
Posted 08/07/2021 - 09:37
Link
First one is spot on! The sense of depth is almost surreal. Really good!
John
Posted 08/07/2021 - 18:19
Link
davidwozhere wrote:
Zoom burst without the zoom. Most effective.
That's what I thought it was when I first saw it! Zoom burst without the zoom. Most effective.
Defo that opening image
Gareth Williams ARPS
My outfit: K1ii - Pentax D FA 24-70mm f2.8 - Pentax DA* 300mm f4 - Pentax modified DA* 60-250mm f4 - Irix 15mm Firefly - Pentax FA 35mm - FA 50mm f1.4 - Tamron SP 90mm macro - Pentax AF 540 FGZ II
Welsh Photographer
Flickr
Instagram
My PPG
Foundation NFT
My outfit: K1ii - Pentax D FA 24-70mm f2.8 - Pentax DA* 300mm f4 - Pentax modified DA* 60-250mm f4 - Irix 15mm Firefly - Pentax FA 35mm - FA 50mm f1.4 - Tamron SP 90mm macro - Pentax AF 540 FGZ II
Welsh Photographer
Flickr
My PPG
Foundation NFT
Posted 08/07/2021 - 20:48
Link
I'll join in on the collective praise for #1 - very well seen indeed.
Posted 09/07/2021 - 13:01
Link
Thank you for all the comments. As I say I didn't see the top image until when looking through the view finder and manually focusing on the centre instead of the seed head. Memo to self: It always pays to try looking at a different perspective from what you first intend photographing.
Paul
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


308 posts
7 years
Doncaster
This time focussing on the seed heads.
K1000, Espio 140, ist, istD, K70, K3iii and numerous lenses, just don't tell my wife.