A Bit of a Challenge
Phil
K-5iiS; K-r; ME Super; ME; DA* 16-50 f2.8; DA 18-135 WR; DA 55-300 WR; HD DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited; FA 50mm f1.4; A50mm f1.7; DAL 18-55mm; M40mm f2.8; + assorted non-Pentax lenses
My Flikr Page link
C&C welcome.
Don.
Andy
My everyday kit consists of the K5-iis and only two lenses, the SMC K30/2.8 and the HD DA 15/4, in other words a "normal" lens and a wide angle lens. With the K30/2.8 I use green button metering and "catch in focus", and do not find this limiting at all. I must be old fashioned

Bjørn
PPG
Flickr
Regards
Paul
Best Regards,
Gajan
Flickr : link
Pentax K-1, Pentax HD D-FA 28-105mm F3.5-5.6 ED DC WR, Pentax FA 77mm 1.8 Limited, Pentax-D FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro WR
Pentax K-5, Pentax 18-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL IF DC WR, Pentax DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED WR
Pentax K100D Super, SMC Pentax 3.6-:5.4 18-55mm AL
All very evocative, I feel transported to the destinations you have captured.
Cheers
Simon
macmccreery.com
www.flickr.com/photos/simac/
www.500px.com/simac
Looks like you covered some ground too.
dave k
My PBase: www.pbase.com/davekitson
Without the back story how many of us would have guessed 1. They were all taken with a single prime lens, and 2. They were taken with a camera that many would consider 'old' technology. Just goes to prove that your best lens is the one you have on the camera at the time, and it's the photographer that makes the image, the camera just takes it.

LennyBloke
Regards Ian
bwlchmawr
Member
Somerset
I dug out my first DSLR, a K100D Super (all 6mp of it) and fitted my little Pentax M 28mm 3.5 which, when converted vis APSC gives a field of view close to 35mm (using an actual 35mm lens is beyond a joke!)
It was hard work going back in time and quite an interesting experiment. I managed quite well getting everything in, as it were, but when faced with some wide views, cheated and shot some panoramas stitched together in Elements. The exposure was often a bit wayward but it was simple to check on the screen and re-shoot; the manual focusing was easier than I expected as the lens is a real one with proper distance markings on the barrel. And using an aperture ring was intuitive, after all, the iris is in the lens not in the camera (why did they stop fitting them to lenses?)
I'm sure the experiment didn't make me a better photographer, just a more frustrated one and one who is grateful for auto exposure, auto focus and zoom lenses.
The pictures benefited from some excellent weather and good light together with the sharp, contrasty lens and CCD sensor. All shot in RAW (the limited dynamic range was a bit trying at times) and processed in Elements.
Any comments are most welcome.
Fungi
At Rhiw Goch
Morfa Bychan
At Tan y Bwlch
Cottages at Croesor
"Palmerston"
Ruin
The Rivals
Harrowing
Ivy
At LowTide
Porth Wen
Y Garn II
Aran from Llyn Gwynant
Evening at Tyn Gadlas
Nant Gwynant
The Nantlle Ridge
Moel Eilio
Pond near Castell Caeronwy
Cwm Pennant
Mynydd Mawr
Ffridd Slate Quarry
The Glaslyn Estuary
Footsteps in the Sand
Will
Mynydd Drws-y-coed
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05