40mm f/2
Posted 31/08/2010 - 07:18
Link
One went on ebay for 180.
JonS sold one recently too.
not much in demand
JonS sold one recently too.
not much in demand
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 31/08/2010 - 08:50
Link
How well does the DA40 sit on a MZ-M or Z-1?
I've heard it vignettes a little and the MZ-M can't operate the aperture.
I've heard it vignettes a little and the MZ-M can't operate the aperture.
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 31/08/2010 - 09:11
Link
I don't know about the MZ-M or Z-1 but on my MZ-30 there were no problems at all.
The lens is a 'full frame' one, so if the body can control the aperture then it should be OK. Maybe somebody else can advise better.
I will say that the sweet spot for the 40 is f5.6 though the image above was taken at f8.
The lens is a 'full frame' one, so if the body can control the aperture then it should be OK. Maybe somebody else can advise better.
I will say that the sweet spot for the 40 is f5.6 though the image above was taken at f8.
Cheers, HG
K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.
Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...
PPG entries.
K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.
Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...
PPG entries.
Posted 31/08/2010 - 09:16
Link
Edited my post, the other site says it is passable on FF but not optimised for it. Still no use on the MZ-M.
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 31/08/2010 - 10:48
Link
In my view there are only two downsides to this lens:
(1) it is MF only, which is not to everyone's taste.
(2) it's a rather odd focal length on APS-C. But if 40mm is what does it for you, then it's an absolute gem.
Actually, I ended up getting another one after selling it first time around. I'm not convinced about the focal length on APS-C but it makes a superb portrait lens with an adapter for m4/3. The ability to use it on occasion with my Pentax is a useful bonus.
(1) it is MF only, which is not to everyone's taste.
(2) it's a rather odd focal length on APS-C. But if 40mm is what does it for you, then it's an absolute gem.
Actually, I ended up getting another one after selling it first time around. I'm not convinced about the focal length on APS-C but it makes a superb portrait lens with an adapter for m4/3. The ability to use it on occasion with my Pentax is a useful bonus.
Posted 01/09/2010 - 01:19
Link
I can't see any reason it wouldn't work with the MZ-M, which has the full, "uncrippled", KA2 mount. They're superb little cameras that are considerably underestimated by Pentax purists.
Al
Al
Posted 01/09/2010 - 06:32
Link
I take it all back, just trying to defend the Voigtlander as I have a spot for them.
Maybe no Manual then? (the point of the M).
No A mode.
How do you set the Aperture from the MZ-M body?
Maybe no Manual then? (the point of the M).
No A mode.
How do you set the Aperture from the MZ-M body?
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 01/09/2010 - 07:14
Link
I have an SMC Pentax M 2.8/40 Pancake. I should use it more.
(All my SLRs are FF and have a replaceable organo-chemical sensor.:lol
(All my SLRs are FF and have a replaceable organo-chemical sensor.:lol
Posted 01/09/2010 - 07:53
Link
dougf8 wrote:
I take it all back, just trying to defend the Voigtlander as I have a spot for them.
Maybe no Manual then? (the point of the M).
No A mode.
How do you set the Aperture from the MZ-M body?
It works the same as any Pentax A lens, as the Voigtlander has all the electrical connections to enable aperture setting from the body, for cameras that support that.I take it all back, just trying to defend the Voigtlander as I have a spot for them.
Maybe no Manual then? (the point of the M).
No A mode.
How do you set the Aperture from the MZ-M body?
And sorry, I know this is a Pentax site, but the Voigtlander is in a different league from the 40/2.8 PKM pancake.
Posted 01/09/2010 - 10:12
Link
Aero wrote:
I can't see any reason it wouldn't work with the MZ-M, which has the full, "uncrippled", KA2 mount. They're superb little cameras that are considerably underestimated by Pentax purists.
Al
You can't set the aperture from the body of the MZM, hence lenses without an aperture ring (such as the DA 40 ltd) can onlly be used in shutter priority of program mode, not manual mode or aperture priority (or rather - in those two modes it can only be used wide open at f2.8 )
I can't see any reason it wouldn't work with the MZ-M, which has the full, "uncrippled", KA2 mount. They're superb little cameras that are considerably underestimated by Pentax purists.
Al
Tony Milner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
Posted 01/09/2010 - 10:42
Link
"You can't set the aperture from the body of the MZM, hence lenses without an aperture ring (such as the DA 40 ltd) can only be used in shutter priority of program mode, not manual mode or aperture priority (or rather - in those two modes it can only be used wide open at f2.8 )"
Thanks for the clarification. In which case either the Voigtlander or the 43mm FA Ltd make more sense than DA Ltd for MZM users....
Thanks for the clarification. In which case either the Voigtlander or the 43mm FA Ltd make more sense than DA Ltd for MZM users....
Posted 01/09/2010 - 12:41
Link
Hardgravity wrote:
I know it's a superb lens and just what canikony owners need, but we have the DA 40.
Which is a stop slower
I know it's a superb lens and just what canikony owners need, but we have the DA 40.
Posted 01/09/2010 - 13:33
Link
amilner wrote:
Apologies. Because of the lateness of the hour, I thought we were still talking about the Voigtlander. As others have said, there's no way of setting the aperture on the MZ-M body.Aero wrote:
I can't see any reason it wouldn't work with the MZ-M, which has the full, "uncrippled", KA2 mount. They're superb little cameras that are considerably underestimated by Pentax purists.
Al
You can't set the aperture from the body of the MZM, hence lenses without an aperture ring (such as the DA 40 ltd) can onlly be used in shutter priority of program mode, not manual mode or aperture priority (or rather - in those two modes it can only be used wide open at f2.8 )I can't see any reason it wouldn't work with the MZ-M, which has the full, "uncrippled", KA2 mount. They're superb little cameras that are considerably underestimated by Pentax purists.
Al
Al
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



6415 posts
17 years
It's available in Pentax mount here link
Regards