24-90

Mannesty
Posted 27/11/2012 - 23:27 Link
cabstar wrote:
Imagine how big and heavy a 60-250mm 2.8 would be never mind the cost
I doubt that it'd be much bigger or heavier than a 70-200mm 1:2.8 lens, especially as it'd only need to satisfy an APS-C image circle.

The Sigma 70-200mm I have is just about manageable hand held, but not for long periods, and it's projects a full frame image circle too, perfect for that FF DSLR that we hope Pentax will make for us.

Actually, I think I read somewhere that Pentax has a 70-200mm 1:2.8 lens on the drawing board.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Edited by Mannesty: 27/11/2012 - 23:29
Posted 28/11/2012 - 11:44 Link
Hi Mac

I recently bought a 24-90 in Exc++ condition for £179... had been looking for a while, and hadn't seen one cheaper than that (although you may of course find one...) but suspect you're probably looking at a price on or around that number...

Good luck with your search

Bill
Stanovich
Posted 29/11/2012 - 16:52 Link
Hi, the 24-90 is an excellent lens if you don't need a particularly wide angle - mine would be on my camera all the time if it wasn't for that. It doesn't feel as well-made as say the 17-70, but the image quality is just as good, maybe slightly sharper at some apertures. The 16-45 is likely to be easier to find though, and slightly cheaper (about £145 I would guess).

Stan
K5IIs, K10D & ME Super with FA24-90, DA16-85, DA55-300, misc old primes; Olympus EM10 & Panasonic LX15.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo