All Forum Comments
Comment by womble posted on New Samyang lens at 01/09/2011 - 13:23
K.
Comment by womble posted on New Samyang lens at 01/09/2011 - 13:21
K.
Comment by womble posted on older zooms at 01/09/2011 - 11:37
K.
Comment by womble posted on New Samyang lens at 01/09/2011 - 11:12
Comment by womble posted on The pixel war at 01/09/2011 - 11:07
full size ISO1600 photo.
Full resolution this time...
http://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/used/IMGP0537.jpg
K.
Comment by womble posted on Q at ISO1600 at 01/09/2011 - 10:54
FWIW my first calculator cost a small fortune. But it still works and is useful today. Can you imagine the same of any of these digital toy cameras in 30 years?
K.
Comment by womble posted on Q at ISO1600 at 01/09/2011 - 09:10
K.
Comment by womble posted on Was It Worth It at 31/08/2011 - 20:25
I've just seen the opposite ends of the spectrum:
Takumar Bayonet 135mm f2.5 for £149 BIN (ok, I'll accept they aren't that bad, but they're not better than an M 135mm f3.5 which can be had for £30-£50!)
£200 for a good LX with some sort of guarantee is a good price.
K.
Comment by womble posted on eBay madness at 31/08/2011 - 20:21
Back to ebay madness. There is a listing at the moment for a Pentax camera with two F series lenses but for some reason the seller has put (Minolta) every time Pentax is mentioned.
I asked:
What has Minolta got to do with this camera? Thanks.
Hi, Minolta is a brand and the lens is a minolta pentax.
Kind regards
K.
Comment by womble posted on eBay madness at 31/08/2011 - 17:10


It is enormous!
http://www.samyang.pl/article,8,news
77mm filters, 83mm diameter, 96mm long, no weight listed yet. Dimensions are pretty much the same as the DA*16-50.
Matt
K.