PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
I fitted a katzeye screen to my K20D. The best thing I ever did.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Katz Eye Split prism at 07/10/2012 - 20:51

womble
DrOrloff wrote:
... I am really getting to like K series lenses.
I know the feeling. I have 11 of them now...

K.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax K 85mm f1.8; Ideas On Value at 06/10/2012 - 17:53

womble
Northgrain wrote:
bforbes wrote:
Especially the first and the last are brilliant
Agreed. Terrifically sharp shots. Which lens???
Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EF DG according to the tags on Flickr.

Stunning photos, BTW.

K.

Comment by womble posted on A few Goldcrests at 06/10/2012 - 11:47

womble
Hi. These regularly sell for in excess of £200, sometimes quite a bit in excess of that --- I vaguely remember one going for about £380 but I don't keep records any more. Optically, they are the same as the S-M-C Takumar f/1.8 and one of those sold recently for £220. Alan Marlow is excellent for lens repairs and normally charges about £40 for a basic service. I've been interested in getting one of these to feed my K-series addiction but have never seen one for a price I could afford.

The M40 pancake sells for about £60 usually. Not the best of lenses, optically, but goes well on something like the ME as a relatively compact point and shoot. The ME is probably only worth £10-£20.

Cheers, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax K 85mm f1.8; Ideas On Value at 06/10/2012 - 11:10

womble
I'm afraid I'm already booked to head south that weekend (to Cornwall) so (yet again) I won't be able to make it.

I hope it goes well.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Whitby Gothic Weekend, Hallowe'en 2012 at 30/09/2012 - 22:14

womble
HowieM wrote:
womble wrote:
One thing no one has mentioned is that you get more images per roll with 645 than 67... given the cost of film and developing these days it is a consideration.

I, however, do keep dreaming of a 67 but keep buying classic 35mm stuff. Must save my pennies, must save my pennies......!

K.
Yes I think your right Kris, think it's 15 shots for the 645 and 12 shots for the 67 if I remember correctly. I'm usually a lot more careful if I'm shooting film and try and take my time more. Doesn't always mean I get better photographs but I certainly think a lot more
Less than 12, only ten I think. You get 12 from a 6x6 neg like my Yashicamat 124G or my Lubitel 2.

K.

Comment by womble posted on 645N, 645Nii or 6x7ii at 27/09/2012 - 21:20

womble
One thing no one has mentioned is that you get more images per roll with 645 than 67... given the cost of film and developing these days it is a consideration.

I, however, do keep dreaming of a 67 but keep buying classic 35mm stuff. Must save my pennies, must save my pennies......!

K.

Comment by womble posted on 645N, 645Nii or 6x7ii at 27/09/2012 - 19:10

womble
Stunning stuff and amazing getting those shots in flight. My favourite is still the reflection one. Have you tried a square crop making the most of the symmetry? The "rule of thirds" is at best "a general guideline" and in that image the symmetry makes a good example of when to break the rule emphatically for a shot with great impact. Lovely.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Some recent dragonflies at 27/09/2012 - 09:38

womble
Lovely scene but it feels as though it needs to be rotated a little?

K.

Comment by womble posted on Too early in the Morning. at 20/09/2012 - 21:56

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo