All Forum Comments
Comment by Tyr posted on Photographing Silver Jewellery at 25/09/2007 - 14:03
Comment by Tyr posted on Weekly Competition No. 12 - "Hard and Soft" at 28/09/2007 - 11:29
That's why for digital Pentax have developed lenses like the SMC-DA 12-24
I was going to give the 10-17 as an example but decided against it.
Comment by Tyr posted on Wide Angle Lens Compatibility Issue at 24/09/2007 - 11:45
18mm becomes 27.54mm equivalent FoV
28mm becomes 42.82mm equivalent FoV
So you need a really wide lens to actually get a wide shot.
Comment by Tyr posted on Wide Angle Lens Compatibility Issue at 24/09/2007 - 11:42
Comment by Tyr posted on Backup battery for K10 at 23/09/2007 - 13:01
My DA 18-55 is absolutely fantastic, I'd be close to calling it a perfect sample. Some people have bad samples though.
Comment by Tyr posted on Pentax A smc 100mm 2.8 at 23/09/2007 - 18:43
It is a bad lens you should post it to me, same with the A135
I had a play with an M200 the other day and it is fantastic. Even without AF it is at least twice the resolution of my DA50-200 which has trouble distinguishing, anything at all and has such bad CA now that it is impossible to remove.
Comment by Tyr posted on Pentax A smc 100mm 2.8 at 23/09/2007 - 13:04
Comment by Tyr posted on Pentax A smc 100mm 2.8 at 23/09/2007 - 08:44
To be exact, magnification ratios are quoted as 3:1 or 2:1 etc. where the magnification is greater than life size.
Where the magnification is less than life size it would be 1:2 (half life size), 1:3 or 1:4 and so on.
Hope that helps.
Easy to get it mixed up...
Comment by Tyr posted on What am I missing DA18-55? at 27/09/2007 - 10:42
Take a look at the 1:3 gallery in my picasaweb (link in sig).
Pretty damn good for £50ish.
Comment by Tyr posted on What am I missing DA18-55? at 26/09/2007 - 23:11



The home made reflector allowed the flash to be used with the lens set to 55mm and to be 25-35mm from the subject. It was a very narrow range which at best gives a 3:1 magnification ratio.
You can also use other surfaces such as crushed velvet, silk or marble as a background.
I don't have any shots with those backgrounds as my reflector was lost in Scotland (someone threw it away thinking it was rubbish) and I never got the chance.
EDIT: As you can see the light falloff is not perfect. It is a little dark at the front and back but that is a reflector design flaw. It took me 5 mins to construct and a further 5 to modify for the desired range and prevent light leaking. Still not back at all for less than 10p worth of materials.