the_drewster

Joined: 23rd April 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

the_drewster
Is it ok having the contacts exposed like that? And can I get an adaptor from Jessops?

And what's an extension tube...

Comment by the_drewster posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:26

the_drewster
Quote:
Err . . . yes, exactly. You'll get something like 4:1 magnification by 'stacking' (that's what the male to male adapter is called, a stacking ring) two lenses.
And the pictures look like this?

Comment by the_drewster posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:18

the_drewster
Quote:
Macro shots are achievable without a 'Macro' lens.
Try putting something like a 70-210mm zoom on your camera. Get a cheap male to male filter thread adapter of appropriate size, and attach a 50mm lens, reversed, to the front of said 70-210mm (set to 210mm).
So, I have a lens hanging off another lens hanging off the camera?

Comment by the_drewster posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:11

the_drewster
1200!

Comment by the_drewster posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:01

the_drewster
I wish I just got a compact.


I want a macro lens please. Donations are welcome and can be sent to

Under The Kitchen Sink,
Behind the Herring Stall,
Over There Street,
Londin,

Failing that what's the cheapest Macro lens I can buy for my K10. It doesn't have to autofocus, it doesn't matter if it's fossillized, but it must be able to take clear close ups of ants teeth.

Comment by the_drewster posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 21:33

the_drewster
Quote:
And I would say that even if I wasn't selling one!
Ha! I know pal, I'm just trying to take in as much info as possible. People are rating this lens so highly I did a search on eBay just out of interest and found listed several of the one I specified above. I 'm wondering now if I should be going for a super fast portrait lens. Shhh.. Don't tell the Mrs.

The reason being, I tried to take a pic of my daughter being thrown up in the air. It was very difficult to do without either being blurry or very dark. I managed to get something in the end by increasing the iso to 800, and playing with it alot in the Photoshop. It's a little noisy and not very sharp.

But I wouldn't have this problem with a lens like the SMC M 1:1.4 50mm?

Comment Image

Comment by the_drewster posted on SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4 versus SMC-FA/F 50mm f/2.8 macro at 20/05/2007 - 13:10

the_drewster
Would I get the same quality from an SMC PENTAX-M 1:1.4 50mm lens?

Comment by the_drewster posted on SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4 versus SMC-FA/F 50mm f/2.8 macro at 20/05/2007 - 11:42

the_drewster
I like them!

Comment by the_drewster posted on Camera Glove at 02/05/2007 - 10:27

the_drewster
Quote:

Every time you wanted to change a card or battery you would have to take off the case. IMHO, more trouble than it's worth and not at all missed.
You know, I didn't think of all that. I just remember my dad having a go for not covering it up.

I've emailed Camera Armor.

I considered Toploaders, and my only problem with them is that you'd be a walking advertisment for muggers.

Comment by the_drewster posted on Camera Glove at 02/05/2007 - 09:54

the_drewster
As a kid, I remember my dad having a Canon A1. It had a glove type leather case that moulded perfectly around it and would hang from the bottom of the camera when it was in use.

Do they make them for the k10. You'd think for that price they'd come with a semi-permanantly attached case.

Comment by the_drewster posted on Camera Glove at 01/05/2007 - 22:11

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo