rparmar

Joined: 23rd February 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

rparmar
Anvh wrote:
btw the lost of light can be more then what you say, the faster the shutterspeed the more light you lose.
Well, sure. Wasn't meaning my comments to stand in for a full read of the manual! Just a couple suggestions. I find however that one or two stops of faster shutter speed is all that's needed. Unless the band are performing on horseback or something.

Comment by rparmar posted on Metz 58 or AF540FGZ as replacement flash. at 10/09/2011 - 22:18

rparmar
By the way I'm just down the road in Limerick. Sometimes we have meetups in Cork but I've actually never met many photogs in Dublin.

Comment by rparmar posted on Metz 58 or AF540FGZ as replacement flash. at 10/09/2011 - 22:16

rparmar
I hope you enjoy the new flash. By all means check out the features, especially these two:

The secondary "reflector" (actually it's a flash) allows you to beam forward some fill light while using the main flash as a bounce. Can work wonders on portraits.

The HSS mode gives you the ability to pick a faster shutter speed than the sync rate, at the cost of a stop or two of maximum light. Nice for action.

Comment by rparmar posted on Metz 58 or AF540FGZ as replacement flash. at 10/09/2011 - 14:23

rparmar
I was looking at Ned's images yesterday. They certainly put this camera in the top ranks of point'n'shoots.

Comment by rparmar posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 14:20

rparmar
Gwyn wrote:
I'm puzzled by Ned's statement that ACR can't deal with the Q's DNG files. I thought DNG was universal - that was the point of it?
It's an incompatible universal format; in other words, Adobe controls it. Stupid, huh?

Comment by rparmar posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 14:16

rparmar
johnriley wrote:
Actually you're wrong with this, there was a time when there was a very vociferous call from several posters for a digital version of the Auto 110. It was quite the idea a while back.
Thanks for the correction - I had forgotten about this. Still, my basic point stands, in that continuous calls and threads for full-frame and APSC mirrorless have littered the forums.

Comment by rparmar posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 14:14

rparmar
Smeggypants wrote:
I obviously won't be buying a Q - however like DrOrloff I do wish it as much success as possible.
I do not. Because making toy cameras and toy lenses for those with money to burn is not a goal I wish to encourage in a photographic company. Obviously it will do well in Japan. But I hope it fails abysmally everywhere else and sends a sharp message back to Pentax.

Given that Pentax has limited R&D money and assembly line resources, wouldn't people have preferred an APS-C mirrorless camera that takes all the current K-mount lenses?

Wouldn't people have preferred a full-frame DSLR?

Funny, because that's what people have been calling for. I can't remember reading even one post amongst tens of thousands on half a dozen forums that ever said "Let's have Pentax make a point'n'shoot with interchangeable lenses."

Comment by rparmar posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 02:41

rparmar
Have fun with the FA77!

Comment by rparmar posted on FS: Samyang 85mm f/1.4 at 07/09/2011 - 22:18

rparmar
I would get the Metz 58 AF-2 depending on cost. I bought the previous model used for a decent price.

Comment by rparmar posted on Which Flash? at 07/09/2011 - 22:16

rparmar
Just a note that the newest model is the Metz 58 AF-2. I have the previous and really like some of its unique features (eg secondary reflector).

Comment by rparmar posted on Metz 58 or AF540FGZ as replacement flash. at 07/09/2011 - 22:13

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo