All Forum Comments
Comment by robbiec posted on Portrait Lens at 07/04/2011 - 13:24
I would need a controlled target and lighting to bother to even attempt this 'test'. Won't happen in the next few days or month perhaps, but I will get around to doing this.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 06/04/2011 - 11:34
Because digital sensors only see about f/1.8 regardless of how wide the lens is
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 06/04/2011 - 11:00
I doubt they would make a (D)FA version of the 50 f/1.2, the current AF module would struggle too much I think. They do however still sell new A series versions on the Japanese market , would make a nice bundle.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 06/04/2011 - 10:30
A bit of a noob question but does the Katzeye have any negative effect if you are using a new lens in AF ?
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 06/04/2011 - 10:25
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 06/04/2011 - 00:22
With regards Katzeye, I ordered on a Friday night and received 9 days later. Just under £150 all in.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 05/04/2011 - 16:40
Smugmug Link if you wish to view full sized versions.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 05/04/2011 - 15:25
I concur with Womble's idea that Pentax should offer a OE fit focussing screen with split prism, they could sell it with a new Limited A50 f/1.2.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 05/04/2011 - 14:29
I can't see the exif (if its there) on this machine but you need to consider your metering settings. Why ISO80?
Number 3 is best of the set but no. 1 looks well clipped. Just looking at the first shot, you have quite a large contrast variance to capture and the sunlight on the daffs would have meant close to -1EV as a starter to see the levels and try to get more detail in the daffs.
Thats my thoughts.
Main thing is that your getting confidence back, which will mean your results improve as you get familiar with the kit.
Best regards
Well No:1 is a bit at the limit I suppose, checking the exif on smugmug its reporting iso80, 1/8000s Pure operator error. Should have stopped down but I was in a Katzeye play/test mode. I'll have a look at the raw file tomorrow and see what I can pull back.
Comment by robbiec posted on I was begining to doubt the K-5 at 05/04/2011 - 01:45

