All Forum Comments
Comment by photo*ist posted on Product registartion and warranty at 10/05/2006 - 04:19
You would expect Americans to adopt THAT policy?
A country built by slaves, on land stolen from aboriginals, touting freedom and equality for all those that can afford a lawyer?
Really?
Regards
Drew
Comment by photo*ist posted on Product registartion and warranty at 10/05/2006 - 01:00
Tanya,
jump in at any point you feel comfortable with.
Comment by photo*ist posted on K-mount lenses on istDs.... probably stupid question at 13/04/2006 - 23:39
Using the DOF preview and viewing the resulting image in the viewfinder of course tells you nothing about if the exposure is correct. It only stops down the lens to the chosen aperture so you can approximate the effect on the depth of field before taking the picture. I guess that is why they call it that and not the Exposure Preview button.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think there is a misinterpretation of Tanya's point. My take on her intent is that she is using the DOF preview button to read the exposure values (+0-) that is visible in the viewfinder when using manual lenses and making the appropriate adjustments. This is an alternative method to using the AE lock button to set the exposure when either the lens aperture ring is not set on the A setting, or with when using manual non-A lenses. She asks a very legitimate question and I doubt she is looking to debate whether the viewfinder image is a good way to see if her exposure is correct. Jump in here Tanya.
Best regards
Drew Peabody
Comment by photo*ist posted on K-mount lenses on istDs.... probably stupid question at 11/04/2006 - 16:11
Cheers
Drew Peabody
Comment by photo*ist posted on K-mount lenses on istDs.... probably stupid question at 09/04/2006 - 17:33
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf
Comment by photo*ist posted on 'Digital only' lenses - are they a good investment at 09/04/2006 - 07:07
Good luck
Drew
PS: The more I use this lens the better I like it. Very good walk about lens.
Comment by photo*ist posted on pentax DA50-200 at 10/05/2006 - 05:11
Drew:
I notice that you describe your lens as a "55-200 DA." Is "55" a typo, or is it a different lens than the one I just bought?
Ted
Comment by photo*ist posted on pentax DA50-200 at 25/04/2006 - 20:38
Your last post came as I was composing this but just to let you know I have the Pentax 55-200 DA and I am quite pleased with it. It is the perfect compliment to the 18-55mm on my DS and these two very compact and light lenses will give you a 28-300mm equivalent range. This lens is probably not the quality a professional would demand but it is one of the best I have ever been able to afford other than old used manual primes I have picked up. It is definitely better than the Pentax 18-55mm DA. The one feature the Pentax DA's will have that 3rd party lenses don’t is the ability to manually focus in auto-focus mode, a big plus in my opinion.
Regards
Drew Peabody
Comment by photo*ist posted on pentax DA50-200 at 25/04/2006 - 20:18
Here is a bit of trivia that makes me wonder how this complicated language ever developed. I simply cannot fathom how adults are able to learn English as a second language.
"The combination 'ough' can be pronounced in fourteen different ways.
1. awe: thought, bought, fought, brought, ought, sought, nought, wrought
2. uff: enough, rough, tough, slough, Clough, chough
3. ooh: through, slough
4. oh: though, although, dough, doughnut, brougham, Ough, furlough, Greenough, thorough
5. off: cough, trough
6. ow: bough, plough, sough
7. ou: drought, doughty, Stoughton
8. uh: Scarborough, borough, thorough (alt), thoroughbred, Macdonough, Poughkeepsie
9. up: hiccoughed
10. oth: trough (alt)
11. ock: lough, hough
12. oc[h] (aspirated): lough
13. ahf: Gough
14. og: Coughlin (also #5)
Crazy!!
Regards from Canada
Drew Peabody
Comment by photo*ist posted on My god! Things have really changed... at 23/04/2006 - 04:03


My Anti American comment was meant to spark a debate.
Regards
Drew