Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
That's a very un-graceful looking vessel! Look more like wind turbines or pylons than sail masts.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax is Cheap? at 14/07/2011 - 10:16

Pentaxophile
I would have a go at ISO1600 if it was that or not taking the shot. I imagine aircraft would clean up very easily in LR / Topaz denoise, especially if the light is good.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Aerial photography on a budget lens suggestions at 14/07/2011 - 09:44

Pentaxophile
When's the robot version due?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Limited Edition 645D at 13/07/2011 - 23:21

Pentaxophile
In reality the cops do let you off going a few mph over. They rightly target the dangerous speeders rather than bothering with someone doing 75.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Me & my shadow at 13/07/2011 - 23:15

Pentaxophile
Karl wrote:
After reading through this am I right in gleaning that older M primes are not going to give as good results as newer DA primes with a digital camera, in my case K10D?

I am looking at the very well priced smc Pentax-DA 35mm F2.4 AL lens.
Would this give better results than the manual primes I have?
I imagine it depends on the particular primes but the 35 f2.4 will be up there with the best of them. I imagine it would be similar to the 35 f2 which is probably it's ancestor, but be better than the f2.8.

Erphoto have done some good reviews of new and old primes in the 35mm / 50mm range. Lenses like the 50 f1.7 still hold their own.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Help me choose at 13/07/2011 - 23:03

Pentaxophile
They allow cropping. He probably should have cropped the image and be done with it. Of course in this instance cropping or cloning have the same result- no effect on the image's content. (And it's not a hard hitting news story here anyway). But there have been cases where images have been cropped and it has dramatically changed the story they told. You can decide not to frame certain things in shot and mislead the viewer. This is kind of what photography is about - emphasising and de-emphasising certain things to tell a story. All trickery. The key thing is whether the photographer is honest, or deliberately sets out to create a distorting picture.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Me & my shadow at 13/07/2011 - 22:43

Pentaxophile
Ooh, harsh. I understand the reason for the rules, and he should have raised the fact that he had done some cloning with the editors if he was in any doubt. But as it didn't change the image content materially, it should have been a 'yellow card' situation imo. He's being punished extra harshly, imo, for the dishonest manipulations done by other photographers which AP should have picked up on, and which caused them embarrassment.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Me & my shadow at 13/07/2011 - 22:23

Pentaxophile
You can be sure that when (if) it does... You'll have a wide angle like the 10-20 mounted!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on fish were'nt biting at 13/07/2011 - 22:03

Pentaxophile
No.2 is a great 'head shot'! I imagine fishing and photography go pretty well together. Be ready for that kingfisher landing on the edge of your rod

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on fish were'nt biting at 13/07/2011 - 10:00

Pentaxophile
Genuinely mint condition, but no box / pouch.

Works with all lenses but no support for AF with SDM lenses as far as I know. It will work fine with screwdrive lenses, and I've used it with my Tamron 90mm AF macro (converting it into a 135mm macro!)

£60 inc P&P or near offer.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Kenko 1.5x DG Teleconverter at 13/07/2011 - 09:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo