All Forum Comments
Personally, I've never actually done a "wet clean" on my sensor using swabs, etc; I just give the sensor a good blowing over with a Rocket Blower about once a week and I've never had a significant dust problem.
i know i have now cleaned it.....wait do u mean set the camera to do itself or to manually clean it?
but yes it was ridiculous before.
xx
I use liquid and swabs, a very steady hand is needed though and the ability not to breathe whilst doing it.
If in doubt get it done professionally, it's quite cheap apparently.
Oh and the pictures themselves, 2,3,4 & 6 are fantastic, well done. I really like the un-posed look.
It's funny, although I take portraits for a living, I really don't like doing posed shots. These are great being natural, the last one is awesome!!!
Paul
Edited: Spelling again
Comment by paullucas posted on Series of sillhouettes from Richmond Park at 06/04/2009 - 14:59
If you like the second shot then that's fine, it's all down to personal taste. Use it as a starter and try to improve on it.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Ok first attemt of HDR photo at 06/04/2009 - 12:19
Also, if you can, try to get the whole of the building in the shot and the flags. I know this can be a problem if you can't get further back, maybe the shot would have worked if it was taken in portrait rather than landscape.
Carl, I understand that this is a first attempt but keep at it as I'm sure in the next few weeks or months you'll have more images on this site that will amaze everyone!!!
Paul
Edited: spelling & gramma
Comment by paullucas posted on Ok first attemt of HDR photo at 06/04/2009 - 09:15
Carl, the detials of the statues on the building is lovely. Pitty that there is a flare in your photo.
This my personal opinion though so don't take it too heavy but was HDR here really nesecairy? I'm mostly against HDR but if it adds something then it's good.
May you please upload the photo with the best exposure so we can see what HDR does for the photo.
Maybe a long exposure would work better instead of HDR.
I am a fan of HDR if it's done properly (no offence meant at all). The subject has to be right and the actual lighting in my opinion has to be correct.
For the shots that you have done maybe a long exposure would have been suffice. There isn't enough cloud to use in a HDR and the detail would have been caught in a long exposure, you could always "dodge" the windows in Photoshop or similar.
Try doing this shot on a day where there is a mixture of blue sky and cloud, or on a stormy looking day.
Maybe do some internal shots, like in a church, try it with natural light only, expect the exposures to be from 2-30+ seconds long.
Maybe refrain from using the auto-bracket and go totally manual, get the feel of the camera, personally, I do these shots in manual as I don't always get the control of the shot when using auto.
Don't be put off from trying these shots and everyones comments on here are to help you and not to discourage.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Ok first attemt of HDR photo at 06/04/2009 - 09:08
The cost and convenience of the Cokin system are very attractive, especially when you consider how much three separate polarisers would be.
Unless you are a professional, or expect to use filters a great deal, I would be inclined to go for the Cokins. They may not be quite as good as the best, but for occasional use they are fine.
Personally I use Cokin filters but I don't use them all the time. Lee Filters are one of the best makes for glass filters, but are, as you know, expensive.
Cokin are really good as long as you protect them from scratches and keep them in their cases when not using them.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Filter system vs individuals at 03/04/2009 - 14:31
well i got there and it was full of drunken yobs, they just wanted to mess about and try to grab the camera etc, it was only a small venue. The lighting was spot on ,however after being there 10 minutes just had to get ot of there.Learn from experience , I will go and look at venue etc next time. oh well back to the drawing board
You have to tell them, in your best manner, that you will not take any crap from anyone and that you are there on a job.
Try to keep doing that type of work if you want to but don't let it get to you.
Just a quick change of subject, what do you enjoy taking photographs of most? What I am trying to say is try to specialise in 2 or maybe 3 different areas to start with, then once you have the experience you can expand.
Just a suggestion
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Shooting at a gig thursday evening at 03/04/2009 - 12:27
Now, and like others say, I never log out and when I shut down and restart the next day, the pages all open nicely and I am already logged in.
Pete, I use Firefox and very rarely use IE due to the security scare a couple of months ago. I'm not going to lecture all of you on what is beter, Firefox or IE, but lets say that there is a clear winner in terms of security....oops a little off topic there, apologies.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Short login time at 03/04/2009 - 08:40
little hands and feet are great subjects...
Comment by paullucas posted on Advice on baby photography. at 31/03/2009 - 22:51
Can you ask if you can wait a couple of weeks - say until the baby is four to six weeks old? It will be much more photogenic then, with it's eyes properly open and more facial expression, and a better colour. Newborns tend to be difficult to photograph well.
But if they want it at once, then they should repeat the session after month or two for sure
But if you do it now, they will want some more after couple of weeks ....and months...etc
Peaceful background sounds sensible. as well as peaceful baby
Sth in this style? (although its not baby on the pic. Just tried different tools some days ago)

I know it sounds harsh but that's the reality of it.
Try selecting a patch of bright clothing or maybe darken the contrast of the B&W then bring out the colour of the eyes.
Selecting the whole face and hair is just far to much plus the shot is very noisy
Paul
Edited: dodgy spelling
Comment by paullucas posted on Advice on baby photography. at 31/03/2009 - 12:16


Lets just say that there wasn't much point to them as they were so shallow.
Paul