MrCynical

Joined: 12th June 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MrCynical
TonyM wrote:
The DA40 is a great lens and another advantage is that you can take the camera out with just that lens and it's really compact.

Tony
On the 'just one lens' front I think the DA35 actually narrowly takes it, given being slightly wider and having macro for 'take any shot you like'. For me at least, the DA40's size is more about fitting it into a bag/pocket (it doesn't look much thicker than the lens cap ) rather than making the camera easier to carry.

matwhittington wrote:
being a similar collector/sentimentalist type I have ended up with both )
Aaargh, don't say that

Mike-P wrote:
Forget the fast focus .. forget the compact size and forget the IQ.

Just see on how sexy it looks on the camera

Comment Image
Well the occasional reactions of "WTF is that" would add some comedy to my photographic life! Out of interest Mike, what is that foam keyring-like thing on your K7?

Comment by MrCynical posted on DA40 at 03/08/2010 - 21:32

MrCynical
Anvh wrote:
]hmmmm I believe we are quite busy destroying that atmosphere for quite some time now
The hole in the ozone layer is actually just about fixed (ie gone) thanks to the international ban on CFCs. Global warming is a different issue from the integrity of our protective layers.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Chance of aurora tonight and tomorrow! at 03/08/2010 - 21:27

MrCynical
I know quite a few people on here have this - is it as sharp wide open as Photozone suggests? I've been eyeing the DA35 for a while, but wondering whether having a non-macro lens with fast AF (is it really that quick?) would be a more useful addition to my current flock than the DA35. Am I mad?

PS: The collector/sentimentalist in me wants to get the DA35 in order to complete the 'set'

Comment by MrCynical posted on DA40 at 03/08/2010 - 19:43

MrCynical
As well as the new body/bodies, there are persistent rumors of a new lens coming out at Photokina possibly of the DA* 'fast normal' (ie f2 and somewhere between 24 and 30mm) variety.

Comment by MrCynical posted on *Ltd or Body Upgrade? at 03/08/2010 - 13:06

MrCynical
Just for the benefit of anyone else reading this in future, I think I might have found the answer:

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/rain-covers-stormjackets/b3023-m362

A bit pricey, but less pricey than screwing up a nice lens I guess!

Comment by MrCynical posted on Weather and lenses at 03/08/2010 - 01:07

MrCynical
If solicitors are involved then it would be best not to air the matter in public until the legal process is resolved.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Warehouse Express and Sigma lenses at 02/08/2010 - 16:19

MrCynical
gartmore wrote:
Whilst shooting the most annoying thing is rain on the front element which doesn't do any harm to the lens but mucks up your pictures.
Trying to take building shots with the Sigma 10-20 and its baby lens hood in the rain. One of life's great adventures

Comment by MrCynical posted on Weather and lenses at 02/08/2010 - 16:18

MrCynical
johnriley wrote:
The WR is liberating and enables photography in dreadful weather. The photo possibilities of bad weather are very exciting, full of potential.

Water inside lenses can cause corrosion, can cause misting of elements and certainly is not a great idea. Water is very invasive.

Like many things, just because we can get away with something it doesn't mean it's a good idea. Not with £500 of lens especially.
Hmm maybe I should buy some of those daft Optech Rainsleeves, but cut the camera body section off so it's just a lens cover. Suppose they're probably made of more water-resistant plastic than a carrier bag, and the lack of zoomring accessibility gives me an excuse to stick to primes

EDIT: Or maybe not. Any suggestions for a suitable material? Really don't want to have Tesco logos wrapped round my DFA100

Comment by MrCynical posted on Weather and lenses at 02/08/2010 - 14:53

MrCynical
How important is weather sealing/resistance on lenses, assuming a weather sealed body? I've been under the impression that, so long as the lens is properly dried out afterwards (ie not put in a sealed plastic box for the moisture to linger ) there is no immense hazard to most weather. Is this true?

PS: Any suggestion that this has anything to do with the DA17-70 being the latest on my 'maybe list' is just a vicious lie

Comment by MrCynical posted on Weather and lenses at 02/08/2010 - 04:03

MrCynical
How recently did you buy the lens? If it won't focus properly even with maximum in-camera adjustment then the lens is defective. Return it to the seller and demand a replacement/refund (or send it in for warranty service if 'recently' means a month or more ago)

Comment by MrCynical posted on Front back focus calibration on K20D at 02/08/2010 - 02:54

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo