Mike-P

Joined: 25th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mike-P
DOes it do the same with an external flash?

Comment by Mike-P posted on New K-7 adopters, what's your impressions? at 13/07/2009 - 20:28

Mike-P
Telstar wrote:


You should be fine Mike, I made a list of those who had said a definite 'yes' earlier in the thread for Amin this afternoon and your on it.
Thanks, I was too busy banging my head against the wall in annoyment to notice my name had been put on the list

Comment by Mike-P posted on Samsung 12-24mm F4 at 13/07/2009 - 19:24

Mike-P
Bugger, been at work all day, count me in if still possible

Comment by Mike-P posted on Samsung 12-24mm F4 at 13/07/2009 - 17:29

Mike-P
Got all excited for a second, from the title I thought Pentax had released a DA* 300mm f4 macro lens overnight without me knowing.

Comment by Mike-P posted on 300mm DA macro at 12/07/2009 - 11:59

Mike-P
Clarky wrote:


I don't believe shooting 200 ISO will give you noise issues.
This was shot at 400iso with on board flash, and I don't see any noise. unless I am missing something ?

Nope, nothing in that ... maybe it was just an exposure issue in the macro shots.

Comment by Mike-P posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 11:29

Mike-P
Excellent pics, especially considering the lack of light.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Auguste Rodin's - The Thinker and others at 12/07/2009 - 11:03

Mike-P
Clarky wrote:


When you say they are not up too scratch, are we talking about the rendering, composition, subject matter, Please elaborate

Thanks for the comments
To my eyes they lack that crispness that I have come to associate with Pentax and in particular your macro shots.

There seems to be a lot of noise for a ISO 200 shot and the focus certainly seems to be off in most of them.

Sorry

Comment by Mike-P posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 10:40

Mike-P
johnriley wrote:


How do you know that if you bought a K20D now you wouldn't be amazed by the difference to your K10D and never look back....?

Because the K20D was not different enough for me in the ways that I wanted. Yes, the better ISO, limited liveview and focus option for lenses may well be enough for a lot of users but as I see it the AF speed and fps should have been done at the same time.
I have seen enough output from the K20D to know that while it is better than the K10D it is not enough for me to move up.

You only have to look at the Flickr stats on Pentax bodies to see that most seem to agree .. there are more than twice the amount of K10D users than K20D and thats 18 months after they released the K20D.

As you said, a very personal thing.

Comment by Mike-P posted on What would you do now at 12/07/2009 - 10:30

Mike-P
Sorry Clarky but to be blunt these are nowhere near your usual standard.
I am really hoping that you are having n off day and this is not what the K-7 is capable of macro wise otherwise I will be doing some serious thinking about what to do next.

Comment by Mike-P posted on K-7 macro pics at 12/07/2009 - 09:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo